The feasibility of a multidimensional intervention in lymphoma survivors with chronic fatigue.

PURPOSE: Chronic fatigue (CF) affects 25-30% of lymphoma survivors, but interventions designed to reduce fatigue are lacking. The main aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a multidimensional intervention study in lymphoma survivors with CF. Secondary aims were to describe individual changes in fatigue, quality of life (QoL) and physical performance from pre (T0) to post (T1) intervention. METHODS: This feasibility study was as a one-armed intervention study performed in 2021. Hodgkin or aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors received mailed study information and Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire and were asked to respond if they suffered from fatigue. The 12-week intervention included patient education, physical exercise, a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based group program and nutritional counselling. Feasibility data included patient recruitment, completion of assessments, adherence to the intervention and patient-reported experience measures. Participants responded to questionnaires and underwent physical tests at T0 and T1. RESULTS: Seven lymphoma survivors with CF were included. Of all assessments, 91% and 83% were completed at T0 and T1, respectively. Adherence to the interventional components varied from 69% to 91%. At T1, all participants rated exercise as useful, of whom five rated the CBT-based program and five rated individual nutritional counselling as useful. Five participants reported improved fatigue, QoL and physical performance. CONCLUSION: Lymphoma survivors with CF participating in a multidimensional intervention designed to reduce the level of fatigue showed high assessment completion rate and intervention adherence rate. Most of the participants evaluated the program as useful and improved their level of fatigue, QoL and physical performance after the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04931407. Registered 16. April 2021-Retrospectively registered. https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT04931407.

Physical exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer-a non-randomized feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and a large proportion of the patients receive adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Most of these experience chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), affecting quality of life. Evidence to advise exercise to reduce CIPN is limited. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of an exercise intervention and data collection among CRC patients during adjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This non-randomized feasibility study included CRC patients admitted to adjuvant chemotherapy to an intervention consisting of supervised aerobic endurance, resistance, and balance exercises twice a week at the hospital in addition to home-based exercise once a week. A physiotherapist supervised the patients, and the intervention lasted throughout the period of adjuvant chemotherapy (12-24 weeks). Participants performed physical tests and filled in questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Nineteen (63%) of 30 invited patients consented. A major barrier to recruit or consent to participation was long travel distance to the hospital. The completion rate of questionnaires and physical tests were near 100%. Seven participants dropped out, five before the intervention started. Median attendance to supervised exercise was 85%. There were no serious adverse events related to the intervention. Except for a planned higher intensity of endurance exercise, we found the intervention feasible and safe. Based on experiences in this study, some adjustments have been made for an upcoming randomized trial, including the supervised exercise taking place close to participants' homes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03885817, March 22, 2019, retrospectively registered.

The effect of exercise on fatigue and physical functioning in breast cancer patients during and after treatment and at 6 months follow-up: A meta-analysis.

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer in women worldwide. Exercise interventions may improve physical and psychological factors during and after active breast cancer treatment. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the current knowledge regarding the efficacy of physical exercise with respect to fatigue and self-reported physical functioning. Systematic searches in Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Cinahl, PsycINFO, AMED and PEDro. After assessing the quality of the studies, we identified 25 randomized controlled trials that included 3418 breast cancer patients. An increase in physical functioning and a decrease in fatigue were observed after a physical exercise intervention, with an SMD of 0.27 (0.12, 0.41) and -0.32 (-0.49, - 0.14), respectively. There were slightly higher improvements in physical functioning and fatigue when the patients received the intervention after adjuvant breast cancer treatment. The 6-month follow-up data showed a small favourable difference for the physical exercise group for both physical functioning and fatigue. This systematic review found that an exercise intervention program can produce short-term improvements in physical functioning and can reduce fatigue in breast cancer patients. However, more studies are needed to confirm the time-dependent observations in this study.

Effect of physical exercise on muscle mass and strength in cancer patients during treatment--a systematic review.

Cancer treatment and its side effects may cause muscle wasting. Physical exercise has the potential to increase muscle mass and strength and to improve physical function in cancer patients undergoing treatment. A systematic review was conducted to study the effect of physical exercise (aerobic, resistance or a combination of both) on muscle mass and strength in cancer patients with different type and stage of cancer disease. Electronic searches were performed up to January 11th 2012, identifying 16 randomised controlled trials for final data synthesis. The studies demonstrated that aerobic and resistance exercise improves upper and lower body muscle strength more than usual care. Few studies have assessed the effect of exercise on muscle mass. Most studies were performed in patients with early stage breast or prostate cancer. Evidence on the effect of physical exercise on muscle strength and mass in cancer patients with advanced disease is lacking. More exercise studies in patients with advanced cancer and at risk of cancer cachexia are warranted.

Physical exercise results in the improved subjective well-being of a few or is effective rehabilitation for all cancer patients?

Physical exercise as an intervention in cancer patients has attracted increasing interest. This review examines the published randomised controlled trials on physical exercise, during and after cancer treatment, focusing primarily on recruitment of patients, patient compliance, content of the intervention programmes and outcome measures. We performed systematic searches of PubMed, PsychInfo, Cancerlit and the Cochrane Library using the MESH terms exercise, neoplasms, cancer, rehabilitation and intervention. We identified 12 randomised trials with sample sizes ranging from 21 to 155 patients. Only four studies reported the number of patients assessed for eligibility and the reasons for exclusion; 15% to 30% of patients assessed for eligibility were randomised into the intervention programmes. Drop-out rates in the trials ranged from 0% to 34%. Most studies included female breast cancer patients (nine studies, 62% of total number of patients). Interventions included aerobic exercise training (10 studies) and resistance exercise (two studies). The studies used a wide range of instruments to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the physical exercise capacity. The studies indicated promising effects on both physiological and psychological outcomes. Randomised clinical studies are few, small in scope, and mainly focus on breast cancer patients. Complete knowledge about the type of physical exercise most beneficial for patients at different stages of the disease progression is still lacking. Future work should identify fewer and more specific endpoints.

Exercise reduces fatigue in chronic fatigued Hodgkins disease survivors--results from a pilot study.

The aims of this pilot study were to compare aerobic capacity in non-fatigued and fatigued Hodgkin's disease survivors (HDS) and to assess the feasibility of an exercise-programme and its effects upon fatigue, physical functioning and aerobic capacity in chronic fatigued HDS. 53 HDS (85%) of originally 62 survivors treated at the Trondheim University Hospital in the period 1987-1997 completed a questionnaire including the Fatigue Questionnaire (FQ). 18 subjects were identified with chronic fatigue. 15 non-fatigued HDS matched for gender and age were drawn as controls. Both groups were invited to medical examination and exercise tests. All 15 fifteen non-fatigued HDS showed up to the medical examination. 12 of the 18 patients with chronic fatigue completed the tests and nine agreed to enter a home-based exercise intervention. Outcome measures were aerobic capacity, fatigue and physical functioning. No significant difference in aerobic capacity was found between the chronic fatigued HDS and the controls. Fatigue, physical functioning and maximal aerobic capacity were significantly improved after the intervention. Aerobic exercise had a positive effect upon chronic fatigue in HDS. However, the study is a pilot study and needs confirmation in a larger group of subjects. The intervention was well accepted, and the majority of the patients adhered to the programme.

Comparison of two physical exercise programs for the early intervention of pain in the neck, shoulders and lower back in female hospital staff.

The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of increased aerobic capacity versus muscle strength rehabilitation of female hospital staff with long-lasting musculoskeletal back pain. Seventy-nine women agreed to participate in the intervention study. After a medical examination, 65 individuals were assigned to one of three balanced groups: Endurance training (aerobic capacity promoting training: ET: n = 22), strength promotion exercise (SP: n = 24) or a control group (CON: n = 19). The active groups met twice a week for 60 minutes of exercise over 15 weeks. Aerobic capacity (VO2max) and musculoskeletal pain were measured immediately before (T1) and after the intervention period (T2). Aerobic capacity significantly increased in the ET group, whereas no change was observed in the SP group, and a significant reduction was found in the CON group from T1 to T2. Musculoskeletal pain was significantly reduced in both intervention groups, whereas minor changes were observed in the control group. Results from a 7-month follow-up (T3) survey confirmed the beneficial effects of interventions on musculoskeletal pain. In conclusion, improved aerobic capacity appeared not to be a necessary mechanism in musculoskeletal back pain reduction.