Prospective randomised open-label comparison of danaparoid with dextran 70 in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia with thrombosis: a clinical outcome study.

AIM: To compare clinical outcomes in a randomised comparison of treatment with danaparoid sodium (a heparinoid), or dextran 70, for heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT) plus thrombosis. METHODS: Forty-two patients with recent thrombosis and a clinical diagnosis of probable HIT who presented at ten Australian hospitals during a study period of six and one half years were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with intravenous danaparoid or dextran 70, each combined with oral warfarin. Thirty-four patients (83%) had a positive platelet aggregation or 14C-serotonin release test for HIT antibody. Twenty-five received danaparoid as a bolus injection of 2400 anti-Xa units followed by 400 units per hour for 2 h, 300 units per hour for 2 h, and then 200 units per hour for five days. Seventeen received 1000 mL dextran 70 on day one and then 500 mL on days 2-5. Patients were reviewed daily for clinical evidence of thrombus progression or resolution, fresh thrombosis or embolism, bleeding or other complications. The primary trial endpoint was the proportion of thromboembolic events with complete clinical resolution by the time of discharge from hospital. RESULTS: With danaparoid, there was complete clinical recovery from 56% of thromboembolic events compared to 14% after dextran 70 (Odds Ratio 10.53, 95% Confidence Interval 1.6-71.4; p = 0.02). Clinical recovery with danaparoid was complete or partial in 86% of thromboembolic events compared with 53% after dextran 70 (Odds Ratio 4.55, 95% Confidence Interval 1.2-16.7; p = 0.03). Overall clinical effectiveness of danaparoid was rated as high or moderate in 88% of patients compared with 47% for dextran 70 (p = 0.01). One patient given danaparoid died of thrombosis compared with three patients given dextran 70. The platelet count returned to normal after a mean of 6.7 days with danaparoid and 7.3 days with dextran 70. There was no major bleeding with either treatment. CONCLUSION: danaparoid plus warfarin treatment for HIT with thrombosis is effective, safe, and superior to dextran 70 plus warfarin.

Studies of natural anticoagulant proteins and anticardiolipin antibodies in patients with the lupus anticoagulant.

Components of the natural anticoagulant system (NAS) and anticardiolipin antibodies were examined in 21 patients with lupus anticoagulant (LA), 13 of whom had past histories of thrombotic episodes. No relationship could be shown between the antigenic levels of protein C and S (PC, PS) and a history of thrombosis. Inhibition of the anticoagulant activity of activated protein C (APC) was observed using plasma from 20/21 patients when phospholipid vesicles were used as the surface for the coagulation reaction. This effect was not affected by the addition of PS. When platelet membranes were employed only 2/21 patients demonstrated inhibition of APC. Under the latter condition, PS functional activity was inhibited in 7/21 patients, six of whom had a past history of thrombosis. Reduced antithrombin III or heparin cofactor II levels were observed in a total of 4/21 patients and may have contributed to the development of thrombosis in three of these patients. Antibodies specifically directed against these proteins were not detected suggesting the possibility of an associated constitutional deficiency. Anticardiolipin antibodies, though elevated in 17/21 patients, did not serve as a useful marker for an increased risk of thrombosis, and the level did not correlate with inhibition of the activity of APC or PS. We conclude that the mechanism of thrombosis in patients with LA is multi-factorial. A subset of patients in whom LA specifically inhibits PS function may represent patients who are at significant risk from thrombosis.

Comparison of laboratory tests used for identification of the lupus anticoagulant.

A comparison of the sensitivities of the ten most commonly used tests for the identification of the lupus anticoagulant (LA) and the lupus cofactor phenomenon was undertaken on 18 patients. All investigations, except the cardiolipin-antibody ELISA assay, were carried out using patient's plasma alone followed by a 1:1 mix with control plasma. Dilution studies (1:3, 1:6, 1:9--patient:control) were also carried out. The kaolin clotting time (KCT) was the only test positive in all patients at all dilutions, while the dilute activated partial thromboplastin time with kaolin (Dil-APTT) registered 17 of 18 positive at all dilutions. Both the dilute Russell viper venom time (Dil-RVVT) and the tissue thromboplastin inhibition time (TTI) (1/500 thromboplastin) identified the LA in 17 of 18 patients on initial testing but were less sensitive in the dilution studies. The KCT is not a suitable test for routine laboratory use, as it requires an individual filtration step. Therefore a combination of either the Dil-APTT or Dil-RVVT together with the TTI (1/500 dilution thromboplastin) is recommended for routine LA screening, as all patients with LA in this study were identified using these easily automated tests. The lupus cofactor phenomenon was most frequently demonstrated using the Dil-APTT.

Campylobacter pylori infection in patients undergoing endoscopy in Fiji.

Forty two patients (20 Fijian and 22 Indian) presenting for endoscopy at the Colonial War Memorial Hospital, Suva, Fiji, were biopsied to detect Campylobacter pylori infection. Detection of the organism's urease activity in biopsy material or seeing the organism in Warthin-Starry silver stained histology sections were used to diagnose infection. Thirty-nine patients (93%) were infected; 19 of 20 Fijians (95%) and 20 of 22 Indians (91%). Of the 39 infected patients, 37 (95%) had chronic active gastritis and 24 (62%) had active peptic ulcer disease. The implications of these findings in relation to the management of endoscopy patients in Fiji are discussed.