Remdesivir for Treatment of COVID-19 Requiring Oxygen Support: A Cross-Study Comparison from Two Large, Open-Label Studies.

BACKGROUND: Remdesivir, an RNA-polymerase prodrug inhibitor approved for treatment of COVID-19, shortens recovery time and improves clinical outcomes. This prespecified analysis compared remdesivir plus standard-of-care (SOC) with SOC alone in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 requiring oxygen support in the early stage of the pandemic. METHODS: Data for 10-day remdesivir treatment plus SOC from the extension phase of an open-label study (NCT04292899) were compared with real-world, retrospective data on SOC alone (EUPAS34303). Both studies included patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 up to 30 May 2020, with oxygen saturation ≤94%, on room air or supplemental oxygen (all forms), and with pulmonary infiltrates. Propensity score weighting was used to balance patient demographics and clinical characteristics across treatment groups. The primary endpoint was time to all-cause mortality or end of study (day 28). Time-to-discharge, with a 10-day landmark to account for duration of remdesivir treatment, was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: 1974 patients treated with remdesivir plus SOC, and 1426 with SOC alone, were included after weighting. Remdesivir significantly reduced mortality versus SOC (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.46, 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.54). This association was observed at each oxygen support level, with the lowest HR for patients on low-flow oxygen. Remdesivir significantly increased the likelihood of discharge at day 28 versus SOC in the 10-day landmark analysis (HR: 1.64; 95% confidence interval: 1.43-1.87). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir plus early-2020 SOC was associated with a 54% lower mortality risk and shorter hospital stays compared with SOC alone in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 requiring oxygen support. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04292899 and EUPAS34303.

The Role of the Multidisciplinary HIV Care Center in Mitigating Social Isolation Among Patients with HIV During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.

As the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020, significant public health mitigation efforts were vital to combat an unprecedented health crisis. These efforts, which involved social distancing and self-quarantine, likely worsened a public health crisis of social isolation and loneliness in the U.S., particularly among people with HIV (PWH). Multidisciplinary HIV care centers, which served as the main source of clinical care for PWH and in some cases the only point of social contact, faced evolving dynamics of in-person visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as a shift to telehealth services. Using in-depth interviews, we explored the role that multidisciplinary HIV care centers and providers played in the experience of social isolation among PWH in New York City. We recruited participants (n = 30) from a multidisciplinary HIV care center in NYC between October 2020 and June 2021. We conducted semi-structured interviews to understand the specific domains of social isolation that were mitigated. In this cohort, the major theme that drove both in-person and telehealth care continuity was the strength of the patient-provider relationship. We found that participants saw members of the HIV care center as part of their social network, and providers served both as a source of emotional support and provided important social resources and benefits. Thus, in times of heightened social isolation, HIV care centers can play a critical role in providing social support in addition to clinical care.

Comparison of evaluation methods for improving the usability of a Spanish mHealth tool.

OBJECTIVE: Mobile health (mHealth) technology is now widely used across health conditions and populations. The rigorous development of these tools has yielded improved health outcomes, yet the ideal approach for developing mHealth tools continues to evolve, indicating the need for rigorous usability evaluation methods. This study compares two usability evaluation methods - cognitive interviews and usability assessments employing a think-aloud approach - for adapting an evidence-based mHealth tool from English into Spanish. METHODS: We conducted cognitive interviews and usability assessments using a think-aloud protocol to evaluate the usability of an HIV mHealth application among 40 Spanish-speaking adults with HIV in New York City, NY, and La Romana, Dominican Republic. The Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) was used to guide the analysis of qualitative data collected from each method. RESULTS: Participants (N = 40) averaged 43 years old (SD = 12.26; range 20-79), identified primarily Hispanic/Latino (92.5 %), and resided in La Romana (50 %) or New York City (50 %). Both usability evaluation methods yielded similar findings, highlighting learnability and information needs as crucial components of participant feedback for the mHealth application. Cognitive interviews captured participants' perspectives on the app's interface and design. On the other hand, results from usability assessments offered insights into participants' competency while interacting with the mHealth tool. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study highlight the contributions and limitations of including cognitive interviews and task-based usability assessments using a think-aloud approach in mHealth usability testing. Future research should employ a multi-method approach, incorporating complementary usability evaluation methods and engaging participants in multiple assessments. Using complementary usability evaluation methods may provide a more comprehensive understanding of the usability and participant experience aspects of a mHealth tool compared to using a single usability evaluation method.

Predictors of missed HIV screening opportunities among newly diagnosed individuals at an urban medical center in New York City, 2018-2022.

OBJECTIVE: To identify demographic and clinical factors predictive of having a missed opportunity (MO) for HIV screening. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Electronic medical records were queried for individuals newly diagnosed with HIV in different sites within a large urban academic medical center in New York City between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was having one or more MO for HIV screening within the institution, defined as any encounter at which screening was not performed in the 365 days preceding the HIV diagnosis. RESULTS: Over one third of new diagnoses had at least one MO in the preceding year. Older individuals, cisgender women and those assigned female sex at birth, and heterosexual individuals were more likely to have at least one MO. An initial CD4 < 200 cells/ul was more likely among men who have sex with women specifically. Most MOs occurred in the emergency department and outpatient settings, with minimal HIV prevention discussions documented during each MO. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that populations perceived to be at lower risk for HIV are more likely to have MOs and possibly late diagnoses, and that universal HIV screening must be implemented into the workflows of emergency department and outpatient settings to facilitate early diagnosis and reduce the incidence of HIV.

Do Walk Step Reminders Improve Physical Activity in Persons Living With HIV in New York City?-Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT: Supervised physical activity can increase functional capacity in persons with HIV (PWH); however, aerobic interventions have shown little improvement in overall physical activity in PWH. In response, we sought to assess the effect of wearing a fitness tracker (FitBit) paired with walk step reminders delivered through an mHealth application to improve physical activity and decreasing body mass index among PWH in New York City. There was no significant difference in the frequency of walk steps between participants in the control group and intervention group from baseline to 6-month follow-up. These findings show that walk step reminders alone were inadequate for sustained improvement of physical activity. This study highlights the need to develop and test the comparative efficacy of physical activity interventions that are tailored to the unique needs and capabilities of PWH. Future interventions should incorporate fitness tracking with tailored interventions focused on the promotion of physical activity.Clinical Trials.Gov Registration number: NCT03205982.

A community health worker and mobile health app intervention to improve adherence to HIV medication among persons with HIV: the CHAMPS study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Persons with HIV (PWH) can now achieve a near-normal life expectancy due to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Despite widespread availability of ART in the United States (US), many of the country's approximate 1.1 million PWH are not achieving viral suppression due to poor ART adherence. Viral suppression rates are particularly low in Alabama (AL, 62%) and New York City (NYC, 67%). There is mixed evidence on the efficacy of community health workers (CHW) and mHealth interventions for improving ART adherence and viral suppression in PWH thus, we sought to combine these interventions and test the efficacy for improving health outcomes in PWH. METHODS: The CHAMPS study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial among 300 PWH with suboptimal primary care appointment adherence (n = 150 in AL and 150 in NYC) over the course of 12 months. Participants are randomly assigned to CHAMPS (intervention) or a standard-of-care (control) arm. Participants in the intervention arm are given a CleverCap pill bottle that syncs to the WiseApp to track medication adherence, reminds users to take their medication at a set time, and enables communication with CHW. All participants complete baseline, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up visits where surveys are administered and, CD4 and HIV-1 viral load are obtained through blood draw. DISCUSSION: Maintaining ART adherence has significant implications in HIV management and transmission. mHealth technologies have been shown to optimize the provision of health services, produce positive changes in health behavior, and significantly improve health outcomes. CHW interventions also provide personal support to PWH. The combination of these strategies may provide the necessary intensity to increase ART adherence and clinic attendance among PWH at highest risk for low engagement. Delivering care remotely enables CHW to contact, assess, and support numerous participants throughout the day, reducing burden on CHW and potentially improving intervention durability for PWH. The adoption of the WiseApp coupled with community health worker sessions in the CHAMPS study has the potential to improve HIV health outcomes, and will add to the growing knowledge of mHealth and CHW efforts to improve PWH medication adherence and viral suppression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04562649) on 9/24/20.

Expert Feedback on the Adaptation and Translation of Spanish Version of WiseApp.

HIV-related disparities also exist in developing countries, such as the Dominican Republic, where minority groups and/or those with low socioeconomic status experience higher disease burdens and worse health outcomes than those with higher socioeconomic status. We used a community-based approach to ensure the WiseApp intervention is culturally relevant and addresses the needs of our target population. Expert panelists made recommendations on how to simplify the language and features of the WiseApp to accommodate Spanish-speaking users who may have lower levels of education, or color or vision deficiencies.

Rapid or Immediate ART, HIV Stigma, Medical Mistrust, and Retention in Care: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Rapid or immediate antiretroviral therapy (iART) after HIV diagnosis improves linkage to care and time to viral suppression. However, iART may affect or be affected by HIV-related stigma and medical mistrust. In this mixed-methods pilot study, we examined the bi-directional role of HIV stigma, medical mistrust, and visit adherence (VA) in the context of iART in a diverse, newly diagnosed patient population. Participants were recruited from an HIV clinic in New York City and we utilized a convergent parallel design integrating quantitative data from demographic surveys, the HIV Stigma Survey (HIVSS), the Medical Mistrust Index (MMI) and electronic medical records, and qualitative data from in-depth interviews. Among the sample (N = 30), 26% (N = 8) initiated ART same-day or within 3 days, while the majority (N = 17) initiated between 4 and 30 days, and 17% (N = 5) initiated ART > 30 days. The median (range) age was 35, and most were English-speaking, Black or Hispanic men and identified as gay. Time to ART initiation was associated with time to linkage to care and time to viral suppression. Day 0-3 group's major theme was iART as stigma prevention, and they had the highest mean HIVSS, lowest MMI score, and a visit adherence of 0.86. Day 4-30 group's major theme was alleviation of internalized stigma, and they had the lowest mean HIVSS score, and highest visit adherence of 0.91. Day > 30 group's major theme was exacerbation of perceived or anticipated stigma, had the highest MMI score and a visit adherence of 0.85. iART implementation requires equitable strategies that address HIV-stigma and mistrust.

Immediate ART and clinical outcomes in New York City among patients newly diagnosed with HIV.

Immediate antiretroviral therapy (iART) has been shown to decrease time to viral suppression. Our center underwent significant practice transformation to support iART, including a same-day Open Access (OA) model and enhanced care coordination. We examined whether same-day ART at linkage was associated with favorable proximate and long-term HIV care outcomes. From 2018 to 2019, patients newly diagnosed with HIV, linked to care at our institution, and iART eligible were included. We evaluated the association between iART and time to viral suppression, and between iART and initial/sustained viral suppression and retention in care. We also evaluated the association between use of OA and frequency of care coordination with the same outcomes. Of the 107 patients included, 72 initiated same-day ART at linkage and 35 did not. There was no statistically significant differences in whether patients were ever suppressed, had sustained viral suppression, or were retained in care between those who received same-day ART and those who did not. More care coordination was associated with retention in care (RR 1.21 [1.01-1.5]; p = 0.05). Organizing vital services and ensuring implementation strategies that facilitate iART, while tailoring the approach to the patient's comfort level, is likely optimal for longitudinal HIV care engagement.

Efficacy of an mHealth self-management intervention for persons living with HIV: the WiseApp randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: Progression of HIV disease, the transmission of the disease, and premature deaths among persons living with HIV (PLWH) have been attributed foremost to poor adherence to HIV medications. mHealth tools can be used to improve antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence in PLWH and have the potential to improve therapeutic success. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of WiseApp, a user-centered design mHealth intervention to improve ART adherence and viral suppression in PLWH. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized (1:1) controlled efficacy trial of the WiseApp intervention arm (n = 99) versus an attention control intervention arm (n = 101) among persons living with HIV who reported poor adherence to their treatment regimen and living in New York City. INTERVENTIONS: The WiseApp intervention includes the following components: testimonials of lived experiences, push-notification reminders, medication trackers, health surveys, chat rooms, and a "To-Do" list outlining tasks for the day. Both study arms also received the CleverCap pill bottle, with only the intervention group linking the pill bottle to WiseApp. RESULTS: We found a significant improvement in ART adherence in the intervention arm compared to the attention control arm from day 1 (69.7% vs 48.3%, OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-3.5, P = .002) to day 59 (51.2% vs 37.2%, OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.0-1.6, P = .05) of the study period. From day 60 to 120, the intervention arm had higher adherence rates, but the difference was not significant. In the secondary analyses, no difference in change from baseline to 3 or 6 months between the 2 arms was observed for all secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The WiseApp intervention initially improved ART adherence but did not have a sustained effect on outcomes.

Back2PrEP: Rates of Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Diagnosis Among Individuals Returning to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care: A Retrospective Review of a New York City Comprehensive HIV Prevention Program.

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces new HIV diagnoses. High rates of incident bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have been observed in patients eligible for and adherent to PrEP. Observational studies generally report low long-term retention in PrEP care. Limited data exist on the rates of bacterial STI diagnosis upon re-engagement with PrEP services. We conducted a retrospective chart review within the HIV prevention program of an urban academic medical center in New York City. Eligible patients started PrEP from 2015 to 2019, then resumed PrEP services after a gap in care of at least 180 days. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were used to characterize the patient population and rates of bacterial STI diagnosis at re-engagement. In total, 286 patients were identified, with 316 qualifying re-engagement visits. Twenty-nine percent of patients had continued PrEP during the care gap, and 30% reported discontinuing medication due to a perceived change in risk. A new STI was diagnosed at 19% of re-engagement visits. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of new STI between individuals returning on or off PrEP, nor between those with perceived lower risk and those without. Individuals who fall out of PrEP services and subsequently re-engage remain at high risk of bacterial STI during the gap in care, regardless of whether PrEP medication is continued or the patient perceives themselves to be at lower HIV acquisition risk. Providers should strongly encourage patients discontinuing PrEP to remain engaged in sexual health services. Alternatives to clinic-based PrEP care must still include regular bacterial STI screening.

Get2PrEP: An Electronic Medical Record Laboratory Comment Increased Safe Sex Counseling But Not Preexposure Prophylaxis Services at a Large Urban Academic Medical Center in Northern Manhattan.

BACKGROUND: HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains underutilized despite its efficacy and potential population impact. Achieving PrEP's full potential depends on providers who are knowledgeable and comfortable prescribing it to individuals at risk of acquiring HIV. Previous educational interventions targeting provider-related uptake barriers have had limited success. We designed and tested an electronic medical record (EMR) interpretative comment to improve the delivery of PrEP. METHODS: An EMR comment provided information on PrEP eligibility and referral resources to providers delivering positive chlamydia and gonorrhea results. Positive test results for bacterial sexually transmitted infections before intervention (January 1, 2019-August 23, 2019) and after intervention (August 24, 2019-December 31, 2019) were identified. A retrospective chart review was conducted to ascertain provider documentation of PrEP discussions or provision, HIV prevention discussions, and HIV screening. Pretest-posttest analysis was performed to compare the provision of PrEP and HIV prevention services. RESULTS: We reviewed 856 preintervention encounters spanning 8 months and 461 postencounters spanning 4 months. Patient demographics were comparable. We observed an increase in provider documentation of safe sex and condom counseling (odds ratios [ORs], 1.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.07-1.18] and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.17], respectively), and the absence of any HIV prevention discussion decreased (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.90), but not HIV screening or PrEP documentation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that an EMR laboratory comment had a modest effect on increasing risk reduction counseling, although not HIV screening or PrEP prescriptions. Future strategies to encourage provider delivery of sexual health services may benefit from more targeted strategies that combine behavioral and information technology approaches.

Lost2PrEP: Understanding Reasons for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Sexual Health Care Disengagement Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Attending a Sexual Health Clinic at a Large Urban Academic Medical Center in New York City.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prevents HIV, but low rates of retention in care limit its effectiveness. We conducted a prospective survey-based study to investigate reasons for PrEP disengagement among men who have sex with men attending a sexual health clinic at a large urban academic medical center in New York City who were lost to follow up; surveys asked about current PrEP status, reasons for disengagement, attitudes toward PrEP, substance use, sexual practices, and behavioral/social determinants of health. Outreach attempts were made to 634 patients; majority of eligible participants were unable to be contacted (59%). Among those who agreed to participate (n = 175), 21% asked to re-establish care. Among those who completed the questionnaire (n = 86), 36% were taking PrEP. The most common reasons for PrEP discontinuation were cost/lack of insurance coverage (31%), decreased HIV risk perception (29%), and side effects (16%). Among those with decreased perception of risk, 62% were less sexually active, 38% were no longer engaging in anal sex, and 31% were using condoms for prevention. Participants reported that free medication (60%), having a sexual partner recommend PrEP (13%), and being able to receive PrEP from a primary care provider (13%) would encourage restarting PrEP. Findings were limited by low response rate (12% of eligible subjects completed the survey) and lack of Spanish-language questionnaires. Understanding reasons for loss-to-PrEP follow-up is essential for HIV prevention. Many people lost to follow up still desired PrEP, underscoring the importance of outreach, benefits navigators, and expansion of PrEP into primary care settings.

Individualized Provider Feedback Increased HIV and HCV Screening and Identification in a New York City Emergency Department.

Efforts to end the HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemics begin with ascertainment of a person's infection status through screening. Despite its importance as a site of testing, missed opportunities for screening in the Emergency Department (ED) are common. We describe the impact of implementing an individualized provider feedback intervention on HIV and HCV testing in a quaternary ED. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the impact of the intervention on weekly HIV and HCV screening in an observational cohort of patients seeking care in the ED. The intervention included a physician champion individualized feedback with peer comparisons to all providers in the ED and an existing HIV/HCV testing and response team. Data were abstracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) for 30 weeks before, during, and after implementing the intervention. We used Poisson regression analysis to estimate changes in the weekly counts and rates of HIV and HCV testing. The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of HIV testing were 1.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.85-2.04] and 1.38 (95% CI 1.31-1.45) times higher for the intervention and post-intervention period compared with the pre-intervention period. The IRRs of HCV testing was 6.96 (95% CI 6.40-7.58) and 4.70 (95% CI 4.31-5.13) for the intervention and post-intervention periods. There were no meaningful differences in demographic characteristics during the observation period. The intervention meaningfully increased HIV and HCV testing volume and positive case detection, including testing in high-risk groups like young adults and individuals without prior testing. Although diminished, the intervention effect sustained in the 30-week period following implementation.

Remdesivir Versus Standard-of-Care for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: An Analysis of 28-Day Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has been shown to shorten time to recovery and improve clinical outcomes in randomized trials. METHODS: This was the final day 28 comparative analysis of data from a phase 3, randomized, open-label study comparing 2 remdesivir regimens (5 vs 10 days, combined for this analysis [remdesivir cohort]) and a real-world retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving standard-of-care treatment (nonremdesivir cohort). Eligible patients, aged ≥18 years, had confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), oxygen saturation ≤94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen, with pulmonary infiltrates. Propensity score matching (up to 1:10 ratio) was used to ensure comparable populations. We assessed day 14 clinical recovery (determined using a 7-point ordinal scale) and day 28 all-cause mortality (coprimary endpoints). RESULTS: A total of 368 (remdesivir) and 1399 (nonremdesivir) patients were included in the matched analysis. The day 14 clinical recovery rate was significantly higher among the remdesivir versus the nonremdesivir cohort (65.2% vs 57.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.90; P = 0.002). The day 28 mortality rate was significantly lower in the remdesivir cohort versus the nonremdesivir cohort (12.0% vs 16.2%; OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-.95; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir was associated with significantly higher rates of day 14 clinical recovery, and lower day 28 mortality, compared with standard-of-care treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. These data, taken together, support the use of remdesivir to improve clinical recovery and decrease mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Attitudes and Perceived Barriers to Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Among Graduate Medical Trainees.

ABSTRACT: Graduate medical training is an opportune time to improve provider delivery of sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening. A survey of trainees found that the majority feel STI screening is their job but identified barriers to successful screening. Training that intentionally address service-specific barriers will be valuable in ending the STI epidemic.

Attitudes and Perceived Barriers to Routine HIV Screening and Provision and Linkage of Postexposure Prophylaxis and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Graduate Medical Trainees.

New York City is the metropolitan area in the United States with the highest number of new HIV diagnoses nationwide. The End-The-Epidemic (EtE) initiative calls for identifying persons with HIV who remain undiagnosed, linking and retaining persons living with HIV to maximize viral suppression, and facilitate access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for patients at increased risk of HIV. HIV screening represents the first step to both the primary and secondary HIV prevention cascades. We conducted an online, anonymous, cross-sectional survey of residents at all stages of training within four residency programs at one institution in Northern Manhattan between August 2017 and August 2018. All internal medicine, emergency medicine, obstetrics and gynecology trainees, and pediatrics were invited to complete the survey via email. Of 298 eligible trainees, 142 (48%) completed the survey. Most trainees were aware of the HIV testing law and agreed that HIV testing was their responsibility, but few successfully screened most of their patients. Most trainees were not knowledgeable about non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) or PrEP, but felt that it was important to provide these services across settings. Barriers to HIV, nPEP, and PrEP varied across specialties. Ending the HIV epidemic will require efforts across clinical specialties. In this survey from an EtE jurisdiction, most trainees felt that it is important to provide HIV prevention services in most settings; however, their knowledge and comfort with HIV prevention services other than testing were low. Barriers varied across specialties, and developing specialty-specific materials for trainees may be beneficial.

Single Room Occupancy Residence: Processes Linking Housing to Not Engaging in HIV Outpatient Care.

Homelessness and housing instability undermine engagement in medical care, adherence to treatment and health among persons with HIV/AIDS. However, the processes by which unstable and unsafe housing result in adverse health outcomes remain understudied and are the focus of this manuscript. From 2012 to 2014, we conducted qualitative interviews among inpatients with HIV disengaged from outpatient care (n = 120). We analyzed the content of the interviews with participants who reported a single room occupancy (SRO) residence (n = 44), guided by the Health Lifestyle Theory. Although SROs emerged as residences that were unhygienic and conducive to drug use and violence, participants remained in the SRO system for long periods of time. This generated experiences of living instability, insecurity and lack of control that reinforced a set of tendencies (habitus) and behaviors antithetical to adhering to medical care. We called for research and interventions to transform SROs into housing protective of its residents' health and wellbeing.

RESUMEN: La indigencia y la inestabilidad de vivienda reducen la participación en la atención médica, la adherencia al tratamiento y la salud de las personas viviendo con VIH/SIDA. Sin embargo, los procesos mediante los cuales la vivienda inestable e insegura conllevan a resultados adversos de salud permanecen poco estudiados y son el enfoque de este manuscrito. En el 2012­2014, llevamos a cabo entrevistas cualitativas con pacientes hospitalizados con VIH desconectados de servicios de atención ambulatoria (n = 120). Analizamos el contenido de las entrevistas (n = 44) con participantes que residían en un programa de ocupación de habitación individual (SRO, por sus siglas en inglés), guiados por la Teoría del Estilo de Vida Saludable. Aunque el programa de ocupación de habitación individual surgió en las entrevistas como residencias antihigiénicas y propicias para el uso de drogas y la violencia, los participantes se mantuvieron en el programa de ocupación de habitación individual por largo tiempo. Esto generó experiencias de inestabilidad en la vivienda, inseguridad y falta de control que reforzó tendencias (habitus) y comportamientos antitéticos a adherirse a la atención médica. Pedimos investigaciones e intervenciones para transformar los programas de ocupación de habitación individual en viviendas que protejan la salud y el bienestar de sus residentes.

Efficacy, Use, and Usability of the VIP-HANA App for Symptom Self-management in PLWH with HANA Conditions.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the VIP-HANA application (app) for improving symptom burden in a randomized control trial of 100 people living with HIV (PLWH) who have non-AIDS conditions associated with HIV. The intervention group received the VIP-HANA app which allowed them to report their symptoms every week and receive self-management strategies tailored to their symptoms. The control arm received an app to report their symptoms every week but did not receive any strategies. The results of our study suggest that symptom burden improved in the participants of both study arms. Although these findings do not support the efficacy of VIP-HANA in improving symptom burden in PLWH who have HIV-associated non-AIDS (HANA) conditions, this could be a function of the study design. Findings suggest that PLWH are interested in monitoring their symptoms, which could have implications for the wider use of digital health for patient surveillance.

RESUMEN: El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar la eficacia de la aplicación VIP-HANA para mejorar la carga de síntomas en una prueba controlada aleatorizada de 100 personas que viven con VIH con condiciones no de SIDA asociadas al VIH. El grupo de intervención recibió la aplicación VIP-HANA que les permitió reportar sus síntomas cada semana y recibir estrategias de autogestión personalizadas. El brazo de control recibió una aplicación para reportar sus síntomas cada semana, pero no recibió ninguna estrategia. Los resultados de nuestro estudio sugieren que la carga general de los síntomas mejoro entre los participantes en ambos brazos del estudio. Aunque estos hallazgos no apoyan la eficacia de la aplicación VIP-HANA para mejorar la carga de síntomas en PVVS con condiciones de HANA, esto puede ser una función del diseño del estudio. Estos hallazgos sugieren que PVVS están interesados en monitorear sus síntomas, lo que puede tener implicaciones para el uso más amplio de salud digital para la vigilancia de pacientes.

Women Are Less Likely to Be Tested for HIV or Offered Preexposure Prophylaxis at the Time of Sexually Transmitted Infection Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Ending the HIV epidemic requires linkage of at-risk individuals from diverse health care settings to comprehensive HIV prevention services. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are significant biomarkers of HIV risk and should trigger preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) discussion. We reviewed STI testing practices outside of sexual health clinics to identify opportunities for improvement in the provision of HIV prevention services. METHODS: An electronic sexual health dashboard was used to identify patient encounters with a positive gonorrhea, chlamydia, and/or rapid plasma reagin test result between January 1, 2019, and August 23, 2019, at a large urban academic medical center. A retrospective chart review was performed to assess HIV testing, completeness of STI screening, and HIV prevention discussion; inadequate screening was defined as no HIV test in 12 months before STI diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 815 patients with 856 patient encounters were included. Patients were predominantly female (64.4%); median age was 24 years (range, 18-85 years). The most common test and most common positive test result was the genitourinary gonorrhea/chlamydia nucleic acid amplification test. Multisite testing was rare (7.5% of patient encounters) and performed more frequently in men than in women (20.3% vs. 0.36%). Women were also more likely to be inadequately screened for HIV (15.1% vs. 25.8%).Documentation of PrEP discussion was rare (4.7% of patient encounters) compared with safe sex (44.6%) and condoms (49.8%). Preexposure prophylaxis was discussed almost exclusively with men compared with women (17% vs. 1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients diagnosed with bacterial STI outside of sexual health clinics, gaps in HIV prevention exist. HIV screening, multisite STI screening, and discussion of PrEP were particularly infrequent among women.