Endoscopic treatment of suprasellar arachnoid cysts indenting third ventricle with obstructive hydrocephalus in children: Thirteen cases.

AIMS: The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of endoscopic treatment of suprasellar arachnoid cysts indenting the third ventricle with obstructive hydrocephalus and discuss the clinical features and outcomes of thirteen children treated at our institution. METHOD: We treated thirteen pediatric cases of suprasellar arachnoid cysts indenting the third ventricle with obstructive hydrocephalus between January 2012 and September 2018. Five female and eight male patients were enrolled in the study. The patients had increased intracranial pressure symptoms due to hydrocephaly. Endoscopic treatment was performed in all cases. RESULTS: The patients were followed-up for an average of 36.8 months. The postoperative intracranial pressure findings improved. There was a reduction in the size of the cyst and ventricles and enlargement of the cortical sulci. One patient suffered transient oculomotor nerve deficit. No further surgical interventions, such as shunt placement, were required during the follow-up period. The head circumference of two of the patients with macrocephaly were stable during the follow-up. There were no postoperative recurrences detected. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic cyst fenestration and third ventriculostomy are less invasive, safer, and more effective ways to treat suprasellar arachnoid cysts indenting the third ventricle with obstructive hydrocephalus in children with hydrocephaly.

Comparison of 1-year results of single transforaminal epidural steroid injection among patients with different spinal pathologies-related radicular pain.

AIMS: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with lumbar radicular pain or radiculopathy caused by different spinal pathologies. METHODS: One hundred and seventy seven patients who underwent single transforaminal epidural steroid injection were included in the study group and divided into 3 subgroups (central spinal stenosis + lateral recess stenosis, foraminal stenosis, lumbar disc herniation) according to existing spinal pathology. Patients' visuel analogue scale (VAS) measures and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were recorded and the patients who give favourable response to treatment were called respondents and who were not called as non-respondents. Subgroups were compared statistically at the end of 12 months. RESULTS: Sixty patients (33.9%) were considered as respondents and 117 patients (66.1%) were non-respondents in the entire study group. Patients with foraminal stenosis included the vast majority of the respondents and showed better results of pain relief as opposed to patients of other groups at the end of 12 months (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TFESI was an effective treatment modality for pain relief and functional improvement in patients with foraminal stenosis. However, it could not produce the same results in patients with central spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniations.