Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 11(6): e01126, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37885367

ABSTRACT

Beta-blocker usage is inconsistently associated with increased fall risk in the literature. However, due to age-related changes and interindividual heterogeneity in pharmacokinetics and dynamics, it is difficult to predict which older adults are more at risk for falls. Therefore, we wanted to explore whether elevated plasma concentrations of selective and nonselective beta-blockers are associated with an increased risk of falls in older beta-blocker users. To answer our research question, we analyzed samples of selective (metoprolol, n = 316) and nonselective beta-blockers (sotalol, timolol, propranolol, and carvedilol, n = 179) users from the B-PROOF cohort. The associations between the beta-blocker concentration and time to first fall were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Change of concentration over time in relation to fall risk was assessed with logistic regression models. Models were adjusted for potential confounders. Our results showed that above the median concentration of metoprolol was associated with an increased fall risk (HR 1.55 [1.11-2.16], p = .01). No association was found for nonselective beta-blocker concentrations. Also, changes in concentration over time were not associated with increased fall risk. To conclude, metoprolol plasma concentrations were associated with an increased risk of falls in metoprolol users while no associations were found for nonselective beta-blockers users. This might be caused by a decreased ß1-selectivity in high plasma concentrations. In the future, beta-blocker concentrations could potentially help clinicians estimate fall risk in older beta-blockers users and personalize treatment.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists , Metoprolol , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Metoprolol/adverse effects , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Carvedilol
2.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 14(1): 89-97, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36656485

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Antidepressants are well-established fall-risk increasing drugs (FRIDs) and therefore falls should be considered an important adverse drug event (ADE) of antidepressants. However, not all antidepressant users experience fall incidents and factors associated with increased fall risk among antidepressant users are incompletely understood. Our objective was to explore whether antidepressant plasma concentrations are associated with falls in older antidepressant users. METHODS: For this study, we included antidepressant users of the multicenter B-PROOF study. Fall incidents were recorded prospectively using fall calendars. Antidepressant plasma concentrations were analyzed by Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) at baseline and at 2 years follow-up. The associations between the observed antidepressant concentration and fall risk were assessed using Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models and adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: In total 93 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and 41 antidepressant (TCA) users were identified. There was a significant association between baseline TCA plasma concentration and fall risk within users (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.07-5.87, crude model). In the adjusted model, there were no significant associations between concentrations of SSRIs and fall risk. CONCLUSION: There might be an association between plasma concentrations of TCAs and the risk of falling in older users. However, these results needs to be interpreted with caution considering the small sample size and accompanying limitation of confinement to crude analyses. Therefore, these novel findings need to replicated in a larger cohort, preferably including adjustment for potential confounders and more frequent measures of plasma concentrations is needed.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Humans , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Accidental Falls , Logistic Models
3.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 19(10): 980-5, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26624208

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between obesity (measured by Body Mass Index (BMI) and fat percentage) and serum 25(OH)D levels in older persons. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from 'the B-PROOF study' (B-vitamins for the Prevention Of Osteoporotic Fractures). PARTICIPANTS: 2842 participants aged 65 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: BMI and fat percentage, measured by Dual Energy X-ray, and serum 25(OH)D levels. RESULTS: Mean age was 74 years (6.5 SD), with 50% women. Mean serum 25(OH)D levels were 55.8 nmol/L (25 SD). BMI and total body fat percentage were significant inversely associated with serum 25(OH)D levels after adjustment for confouders (ß-0.93; 95% CI [-1.15; -0.71], p<0.001 and ß-0.84; 95% CI [-1.04; -0.64], p<0.001). This association was most prominent in individuals with a BMI in the 'overweight' and 'obesity' range (ß -1.25 and -0.96 respectively) and fat percentage in the last two upper quartiles (ß-1.86 and -1.37 respectively). CONCLUSION: In this study, higher BMI and higher body fat percentage were significantly associated with lower serum 25(OH)D levels in older persons. This association was particularly present in individuals with overweight, and higher fat percentages, suggesting that these persons are at increased risk of vitamin D insufficiency.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/metabolism , Body Mass Index , Obesity/complications , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications , Vitamin D/blood , Vitamins/blood , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Obesity/blood , Overweight/complications , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Vitamin D Deficiency/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...