Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: defining the learning curve.

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of laparoscopic surgeons are performing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LGB). Our aim was to determine the length of the learning curve for a skilled laparoscopic surgeon. METHODS: The study population consisted of the first 225 consecutive LGB procedures attempted by one laparoscopic surgeon (HJS). Outcome parameters included mortality, morbidity, operative time, and conversion to an open procedure. RESULTS: Average operative time decreased from 189 min (first 75 patients) to 125 minutes (last 75 patients). Most of the improvement in operative time occurred over the first 75 patients. The perioperative complication rate decreased from 32% (first 75 patients) to 15% (second and third groups of 75 patients). Complication rates did not significantly decrease after the first 75 patients. Low mortality and conversion rates were achieved early in the series. CONCLUSION: Low mortality rates and low conversion rates can be achieved early in the learning curve for LGB. Complication rates plateau after approximately 75 LGBs, and operative times decrease substantially over the initial 75 cases. Operative times continue to decrease at a slower rate beyond 75 cases.

Initial nonoperative management for periappendiceal abscess.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to compare initial operative and nonoperative management for periappendiceal abscess complicating appendicitis. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 155 consecutive patients with appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess treated between 1992 and 1998. Eighty-eight patients were treated initially nonoperatively, and 67 patients were treated operatively. All patients had localized abdominal tenderness and either computed tomography or intraoperative documentation of an abscess. RESULTS: Our patient population consisted of 107 males and 48 females, with an average age of 33 (range, 16-75) years. Age, gender, comorbidity, white blood cell count, temperature, and heart rate did not differ significantly between groups. For the initial nonoperative management group, the failure rate was 5.8 percent and the appendicitis recurrence rate was 8 percent after a mean follow-up of 36 weeks. The response to treatment of the initial nonoperative group and the initial operative group was compared by length of stay (9 +/- 5 days vs. 9 +/- 3 days; P = not significant), days until white blood cell count normalized (3.8 +/- 4 days vs. 3.1 +/- 3 days; P = not significant), days until temperature normalized (3.2 +/- 3 days vs. 3.1 +/- 2 days; P = not significant), and days until a regular diet was tolerated (4.7 +/- 4 days vs. 4.6 +/- 3 days; P = not significant). Complication rate was significantly lower in the nonoperative group (17 vs. 36 percent; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Initial nonoperative management of appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess is safe and effective. Patients undergoing initial nonoperative management have a lower rate of complications, but they are at risk for recurrent appendicitis.

Can perforated appendicitis Be diagnosed preoperatively based on admission factors?

The optimal initial treatment for selected patients with perforated appendicitis may be nonoperative. For this reason it is important to be able to diagnose perforated appendicitis preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of diagnosing perforated appendicitis using only admission factors. The study population was comprised of 366 adult patients who underwent appendectomy for presumed appendicitis during 1997. Admission factors associated with perforated appendicitis were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. These variables were then used to formulate a rule for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for this rule. The admission factors analyzed were sex, race, age, days of pain, temperature, heart rate, symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory findings. Multivariate regression analysis revealed days of pain, temperature, and localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant to be significant (P <0.05). Using two or more days of pain, a temperature of >/=101 F (38.3 C), or localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant as criteria to indicate perforation, we achieved a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 58% for distinguishing perforated from nonperforated appendicitis. We concluded that (1) perforated appendicitis cannot reliably be distinguished from nonperforated appendicitis based on admission factors, and (2) two or more days of pain, localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant, and a temperature of >/=101 F (38.3 C) define a group of patients with appendicitis who have a high incidence of perforation.

Transrectal ultrasonographically guided drainage of gynecologic pelvic abscesses.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the feasibility of ultrasonographically guided transrectal aspiration of gynecologic pelvic abscesses to treat patients for whom intravenous antibiotic therapies failed and whose abscesses were not optimally amenable to colpotomy drainage or transabdominal or transvaginal ultrasonographically guided aspiration. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of the first 15 women with pelvic abscesses that resulted from salpingitis or complications of gynecologic surgery who underwent transrectal pelvic abscess drainage after failure of antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Purulent material was aspirated from the abscesses in 14 of the 15 women. All 14 women with aspirated material were successfully treated with real-time ultrasonographically guided transrectal drainage; only 4 of the 14 had indwelling catheter placement. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographically guided transrectal drainage of gynecologic pelvic abscesses is a safe and effective treatment of pelvic abscesses for women who do not have an adequate response to antibiotic therapy.

Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis without periappendiceal mass.

BACKGROUND: Initial nonoperative treatment for patients with periappendiceal mass has been shown to be safe and effective. Our goal was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of initial nonoperative management for perforated appendicitis not accompanied by a palpable mass. METHODS: The study population consisted of 77 patients with appendicitis treated initially nonoperatively between 1992 and 1998. All had localized abdominal tenderness and computed tomography findings of abscess or phlegmon. None had a palpable abdominal mass. Outcome parameters evaluated were rate of failure, complication, and recurrence. RESULTS: There were 49 males and 28 females with a mean age of 35 years (range 16 to 75). Initial nonoperative management was successful in 95% of patients. Complications occurred in 12% of patients. Recurrent appendicitis developed in 6.5% of patients after an average follow-up of 30 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Perforated appendicitis patients with localized abdominal tenderness and abscess or phlegmon can safely and effectively be treated in an initial nonoperative fashion.

Computed tomography scanning for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis.

The optimal initial treatment for perforated appendicitis may be nonoperative. For this reason it is important to be able to reliably distinguish between acute and perforated appendicitis. CT scanning has been shown to be highly accurate for the diagnosis of appendicitis, but it has not been specifically evaluated for perforated appendicitis. Our objective was to evaluate CT for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Our study population comprised 84 patients who underwent appendectomy between 1993 and 1997 and who had CT scanning performed preoperatively. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively. CT scans were reviewed in a blinded fashion. CT findings were correlated with pathologic and clinical factors. Sixteen patients with acute appendicitis, 59 patients with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, and 9 patients with normal appendices or other diagnoses were evaluated. For patients with pathologic documentation of appendicitis, CT findings that independently predict perforation or gangrene included abscess (P<0.001), phlegmon (P<0.001), extraluminal gas (P = 0.01), and terminal ileal wall thickening (P = 0.03). CT findings of an abscess, extraluminal gas, or phlegmon have a sensitivity of 92 per cent, specificity of 88 per cent, positive predictive value of 96 per cent, and negative predictive value of 74 per cent for perforated or gangrenous appendicitis. We conclude that CT can reliably distinguish between acute and perforated appendicitis.