The QUILT study: quilting sutures in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial study.

BACKGROUND: Seroma is the most common complication following breast cancer surgery, with reported incidence up to 90%. Seroma causes patient discomfort, is associated with surgical site infections (SSI), often requires treatment and increases healthcare consumption. The quilting suture technique, in which the skin flaps are sutured to the pectoralis muscle, leads to a significant reduction of seroma with a decrease in the number of aspirations and surgical site infections. However, implementation is lagging due to unknown side effects, increase in operation time and cost effectiveness. Main objective of this study is to assess the impact of large scale implementation of the quilting suture technique in patients undergoing mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS: The QUILT study is a stepped wedge design study performed among nine teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. The study consists of nine steps, with each step one hospital will implement the quilting suture technique. Allocation of the order of implementation will be randomization-based. Primary outcome is 'textbook outcome', i.e.no wound complications, no re-admission, re-operation or unscheduled visit to the outpatient clinic and no increased use of postoperative analgesics. A total of 113 patients is required based on a sample size calculation. Secondary outcomes are shoulder function, cosmetic outcome, satisfaction with thoracic wall and health care consumption. Follow-up lasts for 6 months. DISCUSSION: This will be one of the first multicentre prospective studies in which quilting without postoperative wound drain is compared with conventional wound closure. We hypothesize that quilting is a simple technique to increase textbook outcome, enhance patient comfort and reduce health care consumption.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor alpha, interferon gamma, and melphalan for locally advanced nonmelanoma skin tumors of the extremities: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon gamma, and melphalan has proved to be useful in the treatment of recurrent malignant melanoma and of locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether this modality is also effective in the treatment of locally advanced nonmelanoma skin tumors of the extremities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with locally advanced primary, recurrent, or metastatic skin tumors of the extremities (12 with squamous cell carcinoma and 3 with Merkel cell carcinoma) underwent HILP with TNF-alpha, interferon gamma, and melphalan. Six tumors were localized in the upper extremity (40%), and 9 in the lower extremity (60%). Treatment-related complications, limb salvage rate, local recurrence, and regional and distant metastases were scored during a median follow-up of 20 months. RESULTS: After HILP, 9 patients (60%) showed a complete response (with histopathological confirmation). Four patients (27%) showed a partial response (with histopathological confirmation in 1 patient), and 2 patients (13%) showed no change (with histopathological confirmation in 1 patient and with clinical evidence in 1 patient). Two patients (13%) showed treatment-related complications. The limb salvage was achieved in 12 patients (80%), and the local recurrences developed in 4 patients (27%). During follow-up, regional lymph node metastases were observed in 2 patients (13%) and distant metastases in 2 patients (13%). CONCLUSION: Based on our results, HILP with TNF-alpha, interferon gamma, and melphalan should be considered as a limb-saving treatment modality in patients with locally advanced nonmelanoma skin tumors of the extremities who would otherwise be candidates for ablative surgery.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumour necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan as palliative limb-saving treatment in patients with locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities with regional or distant metastases. Is it worthwhile?

The management of locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities in patients who present with regional and/or distant metastases at the time of diagnosis remains an unsolved problem. The recently introduced hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and melphalan has been shown to be an effective limb-saving treatment modality, but is it feasible to use this approach with palliative intent? Nine patients, five men and four women, mean age 41 (range 21-75) years with locally advanced extremity STS and regional (n = 3) or distant (n = 6) metastases at the time of diagnosis, underwent a palliative HILP with TNF-alpha and melphalan. Resection of the residual tumour mass was performed, if possible, 6-8 weeks after HILP. Treatment-related morbidity, local recurrences and the limb salvage rate were scored during follow-up. The median follow-up period was 9 (range 3-39) months (seven deaths, but six were due to metastatic disease). Treatment-related morbidity was seen after 3 of the 10 perfusions performed (30%) and consisted of superficial wound infections (n = 2), blow out of the external iliac artery followed by an iliac thrombosis (n = 1). Two patients showed local recurrences after HILP followed by resection of the residual tumour mass, and one patient showed local progression after two perfusions without resection. Limb salvage was achieved in 8 patients (89%). Therefore, HILP with TNF-alpha and melphalan for locally advanced extremity STS in patients with disseminated disease is feasible. The local management of locally advanced extremity STS should be the same whether the intent is curative or palliative, as the local control improves the quality of life.

Feasibility and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy after hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with TNF-alpha and melphalan for limb-saving treatment in locally advanced extremity soft-tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and melphalan is associated with a dramatic antitumor effect in locally advanced extremity soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy after HILP with TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, and melphalan and delayed surgical resection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1991 and 1995, 34 patients--16 males and 18 females, median age 50 (range 18-80) years--underwent HILP for locally advanced extremity STS. Resection of the residual tumor mass was performed in most patients after 6-8 weeks. Fifteen patients with histopathological viable tumor after resection received adjuvant 60-70 Gy external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (44%, HILP + EBRT group). Nineteen patients received HILP without adjuvant EBRT (56%, HILP-only group). Five patients in the HILP-only group had also distant metastases (15%) and received HILP as a palliative treatment. Treatment morbidity, local recurrences, and regional and distant metastases were scored. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 34 months (range 8-54), limb salvage was achieved in 29 patients (85%): 14 patients after HILP + EBRT and 15 patients after HILP only. None of the patients from the HILP + EBRT group developed local recurrences; however, five patients from the HILP-only did (26%) (p < 0.05). Regional metastases were observed in one patient from the HILP + EBRT group (7%) and in two patients from the HILP-only group who were treated with curative intent (14%). Distant metastases occurred in four patients after HILP + EBRT (27%) and in four patients after HILP only with curative intent (29%). The mean morbidity (subjective, objective, medical management, and analytical evaluation) score in both groups was, respectively, 0.33 for skin and subcutaneous tissue and for muscle and soft tissue, 0.34 (HILP + EBRT group) and 0.33 (HILP-only group). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant EBRT after HILP with TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, and melphalan and delayed tumor resection of locally advanced extremity STS is feasible and may increase local tumor control without increasing treatment morbidity.

Angiographic response of locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma following hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and melphalan is associated with a dramatic anti-tumor effect in which the neo-vascularization of the tumor is supposed to be the major target. The aim of the present study was to correlate the angiographic findings with the pathological response in patients undergoing HILP for locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients, 14 male and 11 female, mean age 47 years (range 18-80) were studied. Angiographies were performed before and a median period of 7 weeks (range 4-14 weeks) after HILP. Eight weeks after perfusion, the residual tumor mass was resected and pathologically examined. The changes in tumor vascularization after treatment were scored and compared with the pathological response. RESULTS: All baseline angiograms showed a hypervascular tumor. After HILP, a normal angiography result (NA) was observed in 18 patients (72%) and an abnormal angiography result (AA) was observed in seven patients (28%). All patients with an NA showed a pathologically complete response (pCR) or a pathological partial response with > 90% necrosis of the tumor. Of seven patients with an AA, pathological examination showed a pCR in one patient, 10-50% viable tumor volume in four patients, and no pathological response after perfusion in two patients. A good correlation was seen between angiographic and pathological classification (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An angiography performed after hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with TNF-alpha and melphalan provides a good indication, regardless of whether a good pathological response is expected.

Functional morbidity of hyperthermic isolated regional perfusion of the extremities.

BACKGROUND: Isolated regional perfusion (IRP) of an extremity is a major operation. The therapeutic value for stage I melanoma is still controversial and is presently being investigated in a prospective, randomized study by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. So far there are no reliable data available concerning the morbidity of IRP. Therefore, we performed a prospective, randomized study on this topic. METHODS: In a prospective study, a group of 97 patients with a stage I melanoma localized on an arm or leg were randomized for IRP with melphalan followed by wide excision (WE) and fasciotomy or for WE only. Morbidity was evaluated on the basis of the following parameters: duration of hospitalization, postoperative pain, postoperative performance, and grade of perfusion toxicity. At 12-month follow-up, a physical diagnostic examination was performed to measure the mobility of the joints, and the circumference and volume of the treated and untreated extremities. RESULTS: All the parameters, including the physical diagnostic examination, could be evaluated in 83 of the 97 patients (8 patients died of metastatic disease and 1 patient died of another disease before they could be investigated; 2 patients were in too poor physical condition due to metastases to be examined, and 3 patients were unable to participate for nonmedical reasons). Age and sex distribution were comparable in the various patient groups. Treatment mortality was 0%. There were no complications except for urine retention (one patient) and wound dehiscence (one patient). After IRP + WE of the lower limb, the period of hospitalization was an average of 1.9 days longer (p = 0.01) than for WE on the limb only. This difference was absent for the arm. Naturally after perfusion, there was a significant difference in toxic reactions (edema and pain) between the IRP + WE patients and the WE-only patients. However, at 12-month follow-up, the difference in morbidity between IRP + WE and WE-only patients was no longer present: Morbidity of joints and circumference of the limb were the same. A number of subjective complaints were encountered fairly often after IRP + WE (e.g., pricking sensations or pain during changes in the weather), which can possibly be explained by fibrosis caused by perfusion. These complaints were not quantified further because they did not hinder the patients' functioning. CONCLUSIONS: In a long term, IRP with fasciotomy does not cause any additional morbidity. Immediately after the operation, there was more morbidity as a result of the perfusion, which caused a 2-day-longer period of hospitalization in the patients with lower-limb perfusion compared with those who underwent WE only. These findings are in contrast to those in the literature, in which 25% limitation of motion in the ankle joint after perfusion is mentioned. One explanation may be that we always performed fasciotomy after perfusion to prevent (sub)clinical compression syndrome and avoid late fibrosis.