A comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on memory during two levels of sedation by using target-controlled infusion.

UNLABELLED: We examined memory during sedation with target-controlled infusions of propofol and midazolam in a double-blinded five-way, cross-over study in 10 volunteers. Each active drug infusion was targeted to sedation level 1 (asleep) and level 4 (lethargic) as determined with the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale. At the target level of sedation, drug concentration was clamped for 30 min, during which time neutral words were presented. After 2 h, explicit memory was assessed by recall, and implicit memory by using a wordstem completion test. Venous drug concentrations (mean +/- SD) were 1350 ng/mL (+/-332 ng/mL) for propofol and 208 ng/mL (+/-112 ng/mL) for midazolam during Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale level 4; and 1620 ng/mL (+/-357 ng/mL) and 249 ng/mL (+/-82 ng/mL) respectively during level 1. The wordstem completion test frequencies at low level sedation were significantly higher than spontaneous frequencies (8.7% + 2.4%; P: < 0.05 in all cases), and lower than during placebo (33.6% + 23%) (P: < 0.05 in all cases, except P: = 0.076 for propofol at level 4). Clinically distinct levels of sedation were accompanied by small differences in venous propofol or midazolam concentrations. This indicates steep concentration-effect relationships. Neutral information is still memorized during low-level sedation with both drugs. The memory effect of propofol and midazolam did not differ significantly. IMPLICATIONS: Implicit memory can occur during different states of consciousness and might lead to psychological damage. In 10 volunteers, implicit memory was investigated during sedation with propofol and midazolam in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. To compare the effects of both drugs, they were titrated using a computer-controlled infusion system to produce similar high and low levels of sedation.

First-pass lung uptake and pulmonary clearance of propofol: assessment with a recirculatory indocyanine green pharmacokinetic model.

BACKGROUND: The principal site for elimination of propofol is the liver. The clearance of propofol exceeds hepatic blood flow; therefore, extrahepatic clearance is thought to contribute to its elimination. This study examined the pulmonary kinetics of propofol using part of an indocyanine green (ICG) recirculatory model. METHODS: Ten sheep, immobilized in a hammock, received injections of propofol (4 mg/kg) and ICG (25 mg) via two semipermanent catheters in the right internal jugular vein. Arterial blood samples were obtained from the carotid artery. The ICG injection was given for measurement of intravascular recirculatory parameters and determination of differences in propofol and ICG concentration-time profiles. No other medication was given during the experiment, and the sheep were not intubated. The arterial concentration-time curves of ICG were analyzed with a recirculatory model. The pulmonary uptake and elimination of propofol was analyzed with the central part of that model extended with a pulmonary tissue compartment allowing elimination from that compartment. RESULTS: During the experiment, cardiac output was 3.90+/-0.72 l/min (mean +/- SD). The blood volume in heart and lungs, measured with ICG, was 0.66+/-0.07 l. A pulmonary tissue compartment of 0.47+/-0.16 l was found for propofol. The pulmonary first-pass elimination of propofol was 1.14+/-0.23 l/min. Thirty percent of the dose was eliminated during the first pass through the lungs. CONCLUSIONS: Recirculatory modeling of ICG allows modeling of the first-pass pulmonary kinetics of propofol concurrently. Propofol undergoes extensive uptake and first-pass elimination in the lungs.

Pharmacokinetics of prilocaine after intravenous administration in volunteers: enantioselectivity.

BACKGROUND: Prilocaine exists in two stereoisomeric configurations, the enantiomers S(+)- and R(-)-prilocaine. The drug is clinically used as the racemate. This study examined the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers after intravenous administration of the racemate. METHODS: Ten healthy male volunteers received 200 mg racemic prilocaine as a 10-min intravenous infusion. Blood samples were collected for 8 h after the start of the infusion. Plasma concentrations were measured by stereoselective high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Unbound fractions of the enantiomers in blank blood samples, spiked with racemic prilocaine, were determined using equilibrium dialysis. RESULTS: The unbound fraction of R(-)-prilocaine (mean +/- SD, 70%+/-8%) was smaller (P < 0.05) than that of S(+)-prilocaine (73%+/-5%). The total plasma clearance of R(-)-prilocaine (2.57+/-0.46 l/min) was larger (P < 0.0001) than that of S(+)-prilocaine (1.91+/-0.30 l/min). The steady-state volume of distribution of R(-)-prilocaine (279+/-94 l) did not differ from that of S(+)-prilocaine (291+/-93 l). The terminal half-life of R(-)-prilocaine (87+/-27 min) was shorter (P < 0.05) than that of S(+)-prilocaine (124+/-64 min), as was the mean residence time of R(-)-prilocaine (108+/-30 min) compared with S(+)-prilocaine (155+/-59 min; P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of prilocaine are enantioselective. The difference in clearance is most likely a result of a difference in intrinsic metabolic clearance. The difference in the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of prilocaine does not seem to be clinically relevant.

Recirculatory and compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling of alfentanil in pigs: the influence of cardiac output.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac output (CO) is likely to influence the pharmacokinetics of anesthetic drugs and should be accounted for in pharmacokinetic models. The influence of CO on the pharmacokinetic parameters of alfentanil in pigs was evaluated using compartmental and recirculatory models. METHODS: Twenty-four premedicated pigs were evaluated during halothane (0.6-2%) anesthesia. They were assigned randomly to one of three groups. One group served as control. In the other groups, the baseline CO was decreased or increased by 40% by pharmacologic intervention (propranolol or dobutamine). Boluses of alfentanil (2 mg) and indocyanine green (25 mg) were injected into the right atrium. Blood samples were taken for 150 min from the right atrium and aortic root. Arterial concentration-time curves of indocyanine green and alfentanil were analyzed using compartmental models (two-stage and mixed-effects approach) and a recirculatory model, which can describe lung uptake and early distribution. RESULTS: The CO of individual pigs varied from 1.33 to 6.44 l/min. Three-compartmental modeling showed that CO is a determinant of the central compartment volume (V1, r2 = 0.54), fast peripheral compartment volume (V2, r2 = 0.29), steady state distribution volume (Vss, r2 = 0.29), fast distribution clearance (Cl12, r2 = 0.39), and elimination clearance (Cl10, r2 = 0.51). Recirculatory modeling showed that CO is a determinant of total distribution volume (r2 = 0.48), elimination clearance (r2 = 0.54), and some distribution clearances. The pulmonary distribution volume was independent of CO. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output markedly influences the pharmacokinetics of alfentanil in pigs. Therefore, accounting for CO enhances the predictive value of pharmacokinetic models of alfentanil.

Pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of bupivacaine and mepivacaine after epidural administration of the racemates.

UNLABELLED: We investigated the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of bupivacaine and mepivacaine after epidural injection of the racemate of each drug into six surgical patients. After epidural administration of either bupivacaine/HCl (115 mg) or mepivacaine/HCl (460 mg), blood samples were collected for 24 h. Unbound fractions were determined by using ultrafiltration for bupivacaine and equilibrium dialysis for mepivacaine. Concentrations in plasma, ultrafiltrate, and dialysate were determined by using stereoselective high-performance liquid chromatography. Peak plasma concentrations of R(+)-bupivacaine (389 +/- 93 ng/mL) and R(-)-mepivacaine (1350 +/- 430 ng/mL) were smaller than those of S(-)-bupivacaine (449 +/- 109 ng/mL, P < 0.0001) and S(+)-mepivacaine (1740 +/- 490 ng/mL, P < 0.002), respectively. However, the unbound peak concentrations of R(+)-bupivacaine (20 +/- 11 ng/mL) were larger than those of S(-)-bupivacaine (15 +/- 9 ng/mL, P < 0.005); unbound peak concentrations of R(-)-mepivacaine (485 +/- 158 ng/mL) and S(+)-mepivacaine (460 +/- 139 ng/mL) did not differ. These observations reflect differences in the systemic disposition (distribution and elimination) of the enantiomers, because the systemic absorption was not enantioselective with either drug. This study supports the opinion that the use of single enantiomers, rather than racemates, is preferable, particularly for bupivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: Measurements of the plasma concentrations of the enantiomers of bupivacaine and mepivacaine after epidural administration of the racemates demonstrated that the systemic disposition, but not the systemic absorption, of these drugs is enantioselective and supports the opinion that the use of single enantiomers, rather than racemates, is preferable.

Pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of mepivacaine after intravenous administration of the racemate in volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics of R(-)-mepivacaine and S(+)-mepivacaine were investigated in 10 healthy volunteers. The volunteers received racemic mepivacaine, hydrochloride (dose 60 mg) via a 10-min intravenous infusion. Blood samples were collected at gradually increasing intervals until 8 h after the start of the infusion. Plasma concentrations of the enantiomers were determined with a stereoselective high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method. Unbound fractions of the enantiomers were determined using equilibrium dialysis. The unbound fraction of R(-)-mepivacaine (mean +/- SD: 35.6% +/- 4.5%) was larger (P < 0.0001) than that of S(+)-mepivacaine (25.1% +/- 4.6%). The total plasma clearance and steady-state volume of distribution of R(-)-mepivacaine, based on total plasma concentrations (total plasma clearance [CL] = 0.79 +/- 0.12 L/min; volume of distribution at steady state [VSS] = 103 +/- 14 L) as well as on unbound plasma concentrations (plasma clearance of unbound drug [CLu] = 2.24 +/- 0.30 L/min; volume of distribution of unbound drug at steady state [Vuss] = 290 +/- 32 L), were larger (P < 0.0001) than those of S(+)-mepivacaine (CL = 0.35 +/- 0.06 L/min; Vss = 57 +/- 7 L; CLu = 1.43 +/- 0.24 L/ min; Vuss = 232 +/- 30 L). The terminal half-life (t1/2,Z) and mean residence time (MRT) of R(-)-mepivacaine (t1/2,Z = 113 +/- 17 min; MRT = 131 +/- 15 min) were shorter than those of S(+)-mepivacaine (t1/2,Z = 123 +/- 20 min, P < 0.02; MRT = 165 +/- 24 min, P < 0.0001). This study demonstrated a marked difference in the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of mepivacaine. The stereoselectivity can be partially explained by a difference in the plasma protein binding of the enantiomers.

High-performance liquid chromatographic assay of mepivacaine enantiomers in human plasma in the nanogram per milliliter range.

A method enabling quantification of R-(-)- and S-(+)-mepivacaine in human plasma in the low nanogram per milliliter range is described. The procedure involves extraction from plasma with diethyl ether, centrifugation, back-extraction into an acidified aqueous solution, washing with a mixture of pentane and isoamylalcohol, alkalinisation, followed by extraction with a mixture of n-pentane and isoamylalcohol. After evaporation of the organic phase, the residue is redissolved in the mobile phase used for the HPLC analysis, which consists of a 6.8:93.2 (v/v) isopropanol-sodium hydrogenphosphate buffer solution with the pH adjusted to 6.8 using phosphoric acid. The HPLC method has been described previously. Separation of the enantiomers is achieved with an alpha 1-AGP column and the UV detection wavelength is 210 nm. The minimal detectable concentration is ca. 3 ng/ml and the lower limit of quantification is 5 ng/ml for each enantiomer. For both enantiomers r is > 0.9995 over the plasma enantiomeric concentration range of 10.5-1053 ng/ml.