Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transl Oncol ; 34: 101709, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37302348

ABSTRACT

Background: Data regarding outcomes among patients with cancer and co-morbid cardiovascular disease (CVD)/cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) after SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited. Objectives: To compare Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related complications among cancer patients with and without co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2, reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from 03/17/2020 to 12/31/2021. CVD/CVRF was defined as established CVD or no established CVD, male ≥ 55 or female ≥ 60 years, and one additional CVRF. The primary endpoint was an ordinal COVID-19 severity outcome including need for hospitalization, supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation, ICU or mechanical ventilation plus vasopressors, and death. Secondary endpoints included incident adverse CV events. Ordinal logistic regression models estimated associations of CVD/CVRF with COVID-19 severity. Effect modification by recent cancer therapy was evaluated. Results: Among 10,876 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with cancer (median age 65 [IQR 54-74] years, 53% female, 52% White), 6253 patients (57%) had co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Co-morbid CVD/CVRF was associated with higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted OR: 1.25 [95% CI 1.11-1.40]). Adverse CV events were significantly higher in patients with CVD/CVRF (all p<0.001). CVD/CVRF was associated with worse COVID-19 severity in patients who had not received recent cancer therapy, but not in those undergoing active cancer therapy (OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.31-1.74] vs. OR 1.04 [95% CI 0.90-1.20], pinteraction <0.001). Conclusions: Co-morbid CVD/CVRF is associated with higher COVID-19 severity among patients with cancer, particularly those not receiving active cancer therapy. While infrequent, COVID-19 related CV complications were higher in patients with comorbid CVD/CVRF. (COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium Registry [CCC19]; NCT04354701).

2.
Cardiooncology ; 9(1): 13, 2023 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36895062

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Echocardiograms are recommended every 3 months in patients receiving human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy for surveillance of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Efforts to tailor treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer have led to greater use of non-anthracycline regimens that are associated with lower cardiotoxicity risk, raising into question the need for frequent cardiotoxicity surveillance for these patients. This study seeks to evaluate whether less frequent cardiotoxicity surveillance (every 6 months) is safe for patients receiving a non-anthracycline HER2-targeted treatment regimen. METHODS/DESIGN: We will enroll 190 women with histologically confirmed HER2-positive breast cancer scheduled to receive a non-anthracycline HER2-targeted treatment regimen for a minimum of 12 months. All participants will undergo echocardiograms before and 6-, 12-, and 18-months after initiation of HER2-targeted treatment. The primary composite outcome is symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) or death from cardiovascular causes. Secondary outcomes include: 1) echocardiographic indices of left ventricular systolic function; 2) incidence of cardiotoxicity, defined by a ≥ 10% absolute reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline to < 53%; and 3) incidence of early interruption of HER2-targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this will be the first prospective study of a risk-based approach to cardiotoxicity surveillance. We expect findings from this study will inform the development of updated clinical practice guidelines to improve cardiotoxicity surveillance practices during HER2-positive breast cancer treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (identifier NCT03983382) on June 12, 2019.

3.
PLoS One ; 6(7): e21209, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21750705

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: PPARs (α,γ,δ) are a family of ligand-activated transcription factors that regulate energy balance, including lipid metabolism. Despite these critical functions, the integration between specific pathways of lipid metabolism and distinct PPAR responses remains obscure. Previous work has revealed that lipolytic pathways can activate PPARs. Whether hepatic lipase (HL), an enzyme that regulates VLDL and HDL catabolism, participates in PPAR responses is unknown. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using PPAR ligand binding domain transactivation assays, we found that HL interacted with triglyceride-rich VLDL (>HDL≫LDL, IDL) to activate PPARδ preferentially over PPARα or PPARγ, an effect dependent on HL catalytic activity. In cell free ligand displacement assays, VLDL hydrolysis by HL activated PPARδ in a VLDL-concentration dependent manner. Extended further, VLDL stimulation of HL-expressing HUVECs and FAO hepatoma cells increased mRNA expression of canonical PPARδ target genes, including adipocyte differentiation related protein (ADRP), angiopoietin like protein 4 and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-4. HL/VLDL regulated ADRP through a PPRE in the promoter region of this gene. In vivo, adenoviral-mediated hepatic HL expression in C57BL/6 mice increased hepatic ADRP mRNA levels by 30%. In ob/ob mice, a model with higher triglycerides than C57BL/6 mice, HL overexpression increased ADRP expression by 70%, demonstrating the importance of triglyceride substrate for HL-mediated PPARδ activation. Global metabolite profiling identified HL/VLDL released fatty acids including oleic acid and palmitoleic acid that were capable of recapitulating PPARδ activation and ADRP gene regulation in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: These data define a novel pathway involving HL hydrolysis of VLDL that activates PPARδ through generation of specific monounsaturated fatty acids. These data also demonstrate how integrating cell biology with metabolomic approaches provides insight into specific lipid mediators and pathways of lipid metabolism that regulate transcription.


Subject(s)
Lipase/metabolism , Lipoproteins, VLDL/metabolism , PPAR delta/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic , Animals , Blotting, Western , COS Cells , Catalytic Domain/genetics , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Chlorocebus aethiops , Fatty Acids/metabolism , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Hydrolysis , Lipase/genetics , Liver/enzymology , Liver/metabolism , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Obese , Mutation , PPAR delta/genetics , Perilipin-2 , RNA Interference , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...