Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Psychiatry Suppl ; 172(33): 7-13, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9764120

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current study examines teacher ratings as a tool for identifying students at risk of developing psychosis. Follow-up and follow-back studies have shown that teachers are capable of identifying individuals who later develop serious mental illness. METHOD: We examine the long-term outcomes for individuals at genetic risk who were identified as showing markedly deviant behaviour and those identified who did not show markedly deviant behaviour. RESULTS: Teachers were able to correctly anticipate 35% of students who developed schizophrenia. Furthermore, those identified as showing markedly deviant behaviour had poorer clinical and psychiatric outcomes 10 and 25 years later than those identified as not behaving with marked deviance. Their ratings also differentiated, within the group of people with schizophrenia, which individuals would show evidence of poorer functioning 25 years later. These results were replicated in a group of students not at genetic risk of schizophrenia. Within this low-risk group, teachers were able to predict which students would develop psychotic disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Teacher ratings were particularly useful in predicting clinical and psychiatric outcomes 10 and 25 years later. The applicability of these findings in early intervention and treatment research is discussed.


Subject(s)
Personality Assessment , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Social Behavior Disorders/psychology , Students/psychology , Teaching , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
2.
Schizophr Bull ; 22(2): 223-40, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8782283

ABSTRACT

This article reviews premorbid indicators of psychosis that may be relevant to primary intervention. These risk markers are divided into two categories: (1) precursors related to early etiological factors (family psychiatric history, perinatal and obstetric complications, neurobehavior deficits, early parental separation, institutionalization, and poor family function) and (2) precursors signaling latent mental illness (personality measurements indicating proneness to psychosis, and teacher ratings indicating emotional lability, social anxiety, social withdrawal, passivity, poor peer relations, and disruptive and aggressive behavior). Because teacher ratings have been shown to be powerful predictors of adult mental breakdown, part of this article focuses on a specific study that assesses such ratings as predictors of psychosis in a high-risk population. Risk indicators may also provide clues about protective factors relevant for primary prevention.


Subject(s)
Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child Behavior , Child Development , Child of Impaired Parents , Child, Preschool , Disease Susceptibility , Family Health , Female , Global Health , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Personality Disorders/etiology , Pregnancy , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , ROC Curve , Risk Factors , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/etiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Factors , Teaching/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...