Adverse events in neurosurgery: a comprehensive single-center analysis of a prospectively compiled database.

PURPOSE: To prospectively identify and quantify neurosurgical adverse events (AEs) in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: From January 2021 to December 2021, all patients treated in our department received a peer-reviewed AE-evaluation form at discharge. An AE was defined as any event after surgery that resulted in an undesirable clinical outcome, which is not caused by the underlying disease, that prolonged patient stay, resulted in readmission, caused a new neurological deficit, required revision surgery or life-saving intervention, or contributed to death. We considered AEs occurring within 30 days after discharge. AEs were categorized in wound event, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) event, CSF shunt malfunction, post-operative infection, malpositioning of implanted material, new neurological deficit, rebleeding, and surgical goal not achieved and non-neurosurgical AEs. RESULTS: 2874 patients were included. Most procedures were cranial (45.1%), followed by spinal (33.9%), subdural (7.7%), CSF (7.0%), neuromodulation (4.0%), and other (2.3%). In total, there were 621 AEs shared by 532 patients (18.5%). 80 (2.8%) patients had multiple AEs. Most AEs were non-neurosurgical (222; 8.1%). There were 172 (6%) revision surgeries. Patients receiving cranial interventions had the most AEs (19.1%) although revision surgery was only necessary in 3.1% of patients. Subdural interventions had the highest revision rate (12.6%). The majority of fatalities was admitted as an emergency (81/91 patients, 89%). Ten elective patients had lethal complications, six of them related to surgery (0.2%). CONCLUSION: This study presents the one-year results of a prospectively compiled AE database. Neurosurgical AEs arose in one in five patients. Although the need for revision surgery was low, the rate of AEs highlights the importance of a systematic AE database to deliver continued high-quality in a high-volume center.

Management of Spinal Emergencies in Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

OBJECTIVE: Spine surgeons increasingly encounter acute spinal pathologies in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but only limited data on the management of these patients are currently available. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who presented to our department with acute spinal pathology during treatment with DOAC and who required urgent surgical therapy. Patient characteristics and treatment modalities were studied, with specific focus on the management of hemostasis and surgical therapy. Furthermore, we analyzed 19 cases of spinal emergencies during DOAC treatment reported in the literature. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients were identified and included in the present analysis. Patients suffered from acute spinal cord compression caused by spinal tumor manifestation (n = 5), empyema (n = 4), degenerative spinal stenosis (n = 1), hematoma (n = 1), and vertebral body fracture/dislocation (n = 2). All patients underwent emergency surgical treatment. Prohemostatic substances were administered perioperatively in 10 patients (83%) and included administration of prothrombin complex concentrates (83%), tranexamic acid (17%), and transfusion of platelets (8%). A total of 9 patients (75%) showed postoperative improvement of neurologic symptoms, and the in-hospital mortality in this patient cohort was 17%. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency spine surgery is feasible and should be considered in patients on treatment with DOAC. The (low) risk of intraoperative bleeding complications has to be weighed against the risk of permanent disability if surgical decompression is delayed. Administration of prothrombin complex concentrates and tranexamic acid may improve the coagulation before surgery, especially in cases of unavailable specific antidotes.