ABSTRACT
This work evaluated two emerging techniques in extracting phenolic compounds from Tahiti lime pomace - pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE). PLE was performed at different temperatures (60 - 110 °C) and times (5 - 40 min), and UAE was carried out varying ultrasound power (160 - 792 W), time (2 - 10 min), and solvent to feed mass ratio (20 - 40 kg solvent/kg dried pomace). Both used ethanol and water (3:1, wt.) as the solvent. The effects of these variables were evaluated on global extraction yield, polyphenols, hesperidin, narirutin yields, and antioxidant capacity. PLE was strongly affected by temperature and extraction time, and the highest temperature (110 °C) provided the best results for global yield, total phenolic, and ORAC, except for hesperidin and narirutin, which were not significative affected by temperature. UAE revealed a weak dependency on power, S/F, and time; however, the lowest power level significantly increased the yields compared to no power application. Thus, P = 480 W, t = 6 min, and S/F = 30 was chosen as the best condition in the UAE in terms of overall extraction yield, total phenolics, specific phenolics, antioxidant capacities, and solvent and energy expenditures. UAE mechanisms were investigated by comparing with heated and stirred maceration, and scanning electron microscopy suggested that total phenolic yield was influenced by mechanisms that only ultrasound can provide. Micrographics confirmed the cavitation effect on Tahiti lime pomace particles' surface. To sum up, PLE resulted in the highest yields and antioxidant capacity, followed by UAE.
