ABSTRACT
Demodicose é uma afecção cutânea causada pelo ácaro Demodex sp. diagnosticada com frequência na rotina clínica veterinária. Objetivou-se descrever as manifestações clínicas e histológicas de cães com demodicose nas formas localizada e generalizada, relacionando a quantidade de ácaros e os achados microscópicos ao quadro clínico. Foram estudados 46 cães, sendo 28 com demodicose generalizada e 18 com a forma localizada da doença, dos quais todos possuíam raspados de pele positivo. Destes caninos foram anotados dados de lesões macroscópicas em ficha dermatológica e coletaram-se amostras de pele para estudo microscópico. A análise histológica foi realizada por três avaliadores e os dados registrados sem comunicação entre os mesmos, sendo considerado o resultado que mais ocorreu. Alopecia, descamação, eritema e crostas foram lesões clínicas comuns às duas formas de apresentação da doença que mais ocorreram. Inflamação histológica dermal grave ocorreu especialmente nos cães com doença localizada e generalizada que possuíam piodermite concomitante e ácaros Demodex sp. foram visualizados com intensidade entre moderada e acentuada na maioria dos cães com ambas as formas da enfermidade. Perifoliculite foi a alteração folicular microscópica mais evidenciada nos caninos deste estudo, seguida por foliculite mural e furunculose que tiveram maior ocorrência relativa nos cães com demodicose localizada. De acordo com os resultados obtidos verificou-se que a gravidade das lesões histológicas não corresponde necessariamente à forma de apresentação clínica da enfermidade, além disso, a quantidade de ácaros não demonstrou ser indicativa de lesões clínicas localizadas ou generalizadas, bem como não é possível diferenciar a doença clínica através do exame histopatológico.(AU)
Demodicosis is a skin condition caused by Demodex mite, frequently diagnosed in clinical routine. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and histological manifestations of localized and generalized demodicosis in dogs, relating the amount of mites and microscopic lesions. The study group was formed by 46 dogs, 28 with generalized demodicosis, and 18 with the localized form of the disease, all of them with positive skin scrapings. Macroscopic lesions data in dermatological form were noted, and skin samples were collected for microscopic study. The histopathological analysis was individually performed by three reviewers without intercommunication, being considered the result that more occurred. Alopecia, scaling, erythema, and crusting were the most common clinical lesions in both forms of the disease. Histological severe dermatitis occurred especially in dogs with localized and generalized disease that had concomitant pyoderma and Demodex sp. mites were visualized with intensity moderate and severe in the most dogs with both forms of the diseases. Perifolliculitis was the most evident microscopic follicular change in this study, followed by folliculitis and furunculosis wall, which had higher relative occurrence in dogs with localized demodicosis. According to the results obtained, the severity of histologic lesions does not necessarily correspond to the clinical presentation of the disease, in addition to the amount of mites that apparently is not indicative of localized or generalized clinical lesions, and cannot differentiate clinical disease by histopathology.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Dogs , Dermatology , Dogs/anatomy & histology , Clinical Studies as Topic/veterinary , Mites/pathogenicity , HistologyABSTRACT
Serum samples collected from 547 equids in the Pantanal region of Brazil were evaluated for antibodies to Equine Infectious Anemia Virus (EIAV) by the agar gel immunodiffusion test. Risk factors associated with EIAV seropositivity were evaluated and spatial dependence investigated using a Spatial Lag Model. EIAV prevalence on farms in the Pantanal was 52.0% (13/25) with adjusted prevalence between equids of 31.5% (17.4-48.8% 95% CI). Intra-herd prevalence ranged from 5.0 to 77.0%. Statistical analysis demonstrated that farms and animals in regularly flooded areas had respectively 60 and 146 fold higher chance to be sero-positive than farms and animals located in non-flooded areas. Spatial Lag Model results were generally consistent with this conclusion although there was a negative spatial correlation between farms located within in regularly inundated regions, suggesting that other factors, such as management practices, probably play a significant role in transmission of EIAV. Equids with clinical signs were 3.74-fold more likely to be sero-positive than those without clinical signs. The results of this work reveal a high prevalence of EIAV in the Pantanal area of Brazil demonstrating that equids reared in this region are at great risk of infection.
