Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 32: e20230462, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39140577

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Several materials have been developed to preserve pulp vitality. They should have ideal cytocompatibility characteristics to promote the activity of stem cells of human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) and thus heal pulp tissue. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cytotoxicity of different dilutions of bioceramic material extracts in SHED. METHODOLOGY: SHED were immersed in αMEM + the material extract according to the following experimental groups: Group 1 (G1) -BBio membrane, Group 2 (G2) - Bio-C Repair, Group 3 (G3) - MTA Repair HP, Group 4 (G4) - TheraCal LC, and Group 5 (G5) - Biodentine. Positive and negative control groups were maintained respectively in αMEM + 10% FBS and Milli-Q Water. The methods to analyze cell viability and proliferation involved MTT and Alamar Blue assays at 24, 48, and 72H after the contact of the SHED with bioceramic extracts at 1:1 and 1:2 dilutions. Data were analyzed by the three-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's test (p<0.05). RESULTS: At 1:1 dilution, SHED in contact with the MTA HP Repair extract showed statistically higher cell viability than the other experimental groups and the negative control (p<0.05), except for TheraCal LC (p> 0.05). At 1:2 dilution, BBio Membrane and Bio-C showed statistically higher values in intra- and intergroup comparisons (p<0.05). BBio Membrane, Bio-C Repair, and Biodentine extracts at 1:1 dilution showed greater cytotoxicity than 1:2 dilution in all periods (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: MTA HP Repair showed the lowest cytotoxicity even at a 1:1 dilution. At a 1:2 dilution, the SHED in contact with the BBio membrane extract showed high cell viability. Thus, the BBio membrane would be a new non-cytotoxic biomaterial for SHED. Results offer possibilities of biomaterials that can be indicated for use in clinical regenerative procedures of the dentin-pulp complex.


Subject(s)
Aluminum Compounds , Biocompatible Materials , Calcium Compounds , Cell Proliferation , Cell Survival , Ceramics , Dental Pulp , Drug Combinations , Materials Testing , Oxides , Silicates , Stem Cells , Tooth, Deciduous , Humans , Tooth, Deciduous/drug effects , Silicates/chemistry , Silicates/toxicity , Silicates/pharmacology , Cell Survival/drug effects , Calcium Compounds/chemistry , Calcium Compounds/pharmacology , Calcium Compounds/toxicity , Stem Cells/drug effects , Time Factors , Oxides/chemistry , Oxides/toxicity , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Dental Pulp/drug effects , Dental Pulp/cytology , Ceramics/chemistry , Ceramics/toxicity , Aluminum Compounds/chemistry , Aluminum Compounds/toxicity , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Analysis of Variance , Reproducibility of Results , Bismuth/chemistry , Bismuth/toxicity , Bismuth/pharmacology , Cells, Cultured , Reference Values , Tetrazolium Salts , Xanthenes/chemistry , Oxazines
2.
Braz. dent. sci ; 27(2): 1-8, 2024. tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-1568517

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate stem cell from human deciduous teeth (SHED) viability after exposure to different bioceramic materials. Material and Methods: Discs were constructed to obtain the material extracts according to the following groups: G1 - Bio-C Repair, G2 - MTA Repair HP, G3 - TheraCal LC, and G4 ­ Biodentine. Positive and negative control group were respectively maintained with αMEM + 10% FBS and αMEM + 1% FBS. SHED obtained through primary culture were in contact with material extracts for 24, 48, and 72h. MTT assay evaluated cell viability. Groups were plated in triplicate and the cell viability assay were repeated three times. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (p<0.05). Results: The treatment and period comparisons showed statistically significant differences (p<0.000). G2 (MTA Repair HP) had greater cell viability values than the other experimental groups and negative control. MTA Repair HP and the control groups exhibited a similar behavior with cell viability values decreasing from 24h to 48h and increasing from 48h to 72h. Bio-C Repair, Biodentine, and Theracal LC did not show statistically significant differences among periods. Conclusions: SHED increased viability values after contact with MTA Repair HP in comparison with other bioceramic materials.(AU)


Objetivo: O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a viabilidade de células-tronco de dentes decíduos humanos (SHED) após o contato com diferentes materiais biocerâmicos. Material e Métodos: Foram confeccionados discos para obtenção dos extratos dos materiais de acordo com os seguintes grupos: G1 - Bio-C Repair, G2 - MTA Repair HP, G3 - TheraCal LC e G4 - Biodentine. Grupo de controle positivo e negativo foram mantidos respectivamente com αMEM + 10% FBS e αMEM + 1% FBS. SHED obtidas por cultura primária entraram em contato com os extratos de materiais por 24, 48 e 72h. O ensaio MTT avaliou a viabilidade celular. Os grupos foram semeados em triplicata e o ensaio de viabilidade celular foi repetido três vezes. Os dados foram analisados por ANOVA a dois critérios seguido pelo teste de Tukey (p<0,05). Resultados: As comparações de tratamentos e períodos mostraram diferenças estatisticamente significativas (p<0,000). O G2 (MTA Repair HP) apresentou maiores valores de viabilidade celular que os demais grupos experimentais e controle negativo. O MTA Repair HP e os grupos controle exibiram um comportamento semelhante com os valores de viabilidade celular diminuindo de 24h para 48h e aumentando de 48h para 72h. Bio-C Repair, Biodentine e Theracal LC não apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os períodos. Conclusões: SHED aumentou os valores de viabilidade após o contato com o MTA Repair HP em comparação com outros materiais biocerâmicos (AU)


Subject(s)
Stem Cells , Tooth, Deciduous , Materials Testing , Cell Survival
3.
J. appl. oral sci ; J. appl. oral sci;32: e20230462, 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1569299

ABSTRACT

Abstract Several materials have been developed to preserve pulp vitality. They should have ideal cytocompatibility characteristics to promote the activity of stem cells of human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) and thus heal pulp tissue. Objective To evaluate the cytotoxicity of different dilutions of bioceramic material extracts in SHED. Methodology SHED were immersed in αMEM + the material extract according to the following experimental groups: Group 1 (G1) -BBio membrane, Group 2 (G2) - Bio-C Repair, Group 3 (G3) - MTA Repair HP, Group 4 (G4) - TheraCal LC, and Group 5 (G5) - Biodentine. Positive and negative control groups were maintained respectively in αMEM + 10% FBS and Milli-Q Water. The methods to analyze cell viability and proliferation involved MTT and Alamar Blue assays at 24, 48, and 72H after the contact of the SHED with bioceramic extracts at 1:1 and 1:2 dilutions. Data were analyzed by the three-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's test (p<0.05). Results At 1:1 dilution, SHED in contact with the MTA HP Repair extract showed statistically higher cell viability than the other experimental groups and the negative control (p<0.05), except for TheraCal LC (p> 0.05). At 1:2 dilution, BBio Membrane and Bio-C showed statistically higher values in intra- and intergroup comparisons (p<0.05). BBio Membrane, Bio-C Repair, and Biodentine extracts at 1:1 dilution showed greater cytotoxicity than 1:2 dilution in all periods (p<0.05). Conclusion MTA HP Repair showed the lowest cytotoxicity even at a 1:1 dilution. At a 1:2 dilution, the SHED in contact with the BBio membrane extract showed high cell viability. Thus, the BBio membrane would be a new non-cytotoxic biomaterial for SHED. Results offer possibilities of biomaterials that can be indicated for use in clinical regenerative procedures of the dentin-pulp complex.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL