Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry ; 28(3): 1217-1238, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36302735

ABSTRACT

It is becoming increasingly common for frontline clinicians to see children and teenagers struggle with their mental health. Since mental health issues have increased over the past ten years in the UK, they are now the leading cause of disability and cost the British economy £105 billion annually. The review discusses the evidence base underpinning the effect of yoga on children's mental health and summarises the results of 21 research papers. The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Library were searched through Ovid from January 2008 until May 2022. The keywords 'yoga OR mindfulness - AND school AND children OR child OR youth OR adolescent' were used. The search was limited to studies in the English language. The quality of each study was rated against Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised control trials and a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The evidence for yoga therapies in children is encouraging, although studies include methodological flaws such as small sample sizes and sparse information on interventions. This review has highlighted that yoga interventions may be implemented in schools as a preventative and therapeutic measure for mental health issues.


Subject(s)
Yoga , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Mental Health , Narration , Child Health , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
Euro Surveill ; 24(2)2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30646975

ABSTRACT

We report an ongoing measles outbreak in Manaus, Amazonas state, Brazil. As at 3 November 2018, 1,631 cases were confirmed corresponding to an incidence of 75.3 per 100,000 inhabitants; all five sanitary districts presented confirmed cases. Reintroduction of measles virus in Manaus is likely related to the current outbreak in Venezuela and due to recent decline in measles vaccine coverage. Given the current scenario, prevention and control measures should target individuals aged 15-29 years.


Subject(s)
Disease Notification/statistics & numerical data , Disease Outbreaks , Immunization/statistics & numerical data , Measles Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles virus/isolation & purification , Measles/epidemiology , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Immunization Programs , Infant , Male , Measles/diagnosis , Measles/prevention & control , Measles virus/genetics , Measles virus/immunology , Middle Aged , Venezuela/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 2: CD005972, 2018 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29390172

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A Class II division 2 malocclusion is characterised by upper front teeth that are retroclined (tilted toward the roof of the mouth) and an increased overbite (deep overbite), which can cause oral problems and may affect appearance.This problem can be corrected by the use of special dental braces (functional appliances) that move the upper front teeth forward and change the growth of the upper or lower jaws, or both. Most types of functional appliances are removable and this treatment approach does not usually require extraction of any permanent teeth. Additional treatment with fixed braces may be necessary to ensure the best result.An alternative approach is to provide space for the correction of the front teeth by moving the molar teeth backwards. This is done by applying a force to the teeth from the back of the head using a head brace (headgear) and transmitting this force to part of a fixed or removable dental brace that is attached to the back teeth. The treatment may be carried out with or without extraction of permanent teeth.If headgear use is not feasible, the back teeth may be held in place by bands connected to a fixed bar placed across the roof of the mouth or in contact with the front of the roof of the mouth. This treatment usually requires two permanent teeth to be taken out from the middle of the upper arch (one on each side). OBJECTIVES: To establish whether orthodontic treatment that does not involve extraction of permanent teeth produces a result that is any different from no orthodontic treatment or orthodontic treatment involving extraction of permanent teeth, in children with a Class II division 2 malocclusion. SEARCH METHODS: Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 13 November 2017), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library, 2017, Issue 10), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 13 November 2017), and Embase Ovid (1980 to 13 November 2017). To identify any unpublished or ongoing trials, the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (ClinicalTrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (apps.who.int/trialsearch) were searched. We also contacted international researchers who were likely to be involved in any Class II division 2 clinical trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of orthodontic treatments to correct deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened the search results to find eligible studies, and would have extracted data and assessed the risk of bias from any included trials. We had planned to use random-effects meta-analysis; to express effect estimates as mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals; and to investigate any clinical or methodological heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: We did not identify any RCTs or CCTs that assessed the treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusion in children. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from clinical trials to recommend or discourage any type of orthodontic treatment to correct Class II division 2 malocclusion in children. This situation seems unlikely to change as trials to evaluate the best management of Class II division 2 malocclusion are challenging to design and conduct due to low prevalence, difficulties with recruitment and ethical issues with randomisation.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Orthodontic Appliances, Functional , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Child , Humans , Tooth Extraction
5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 10: CD005972, 2017 10 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28968484

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A Class II division 2 malocclusion is characterised by upper front teeth that are retroclined (tilted toward the roof of the mouth) and an increased overbite (deep overbite), which can cause oral problems and may affect appearance.This problem can be corrected by the use of special dental braces (functional appliances) that move the upper front teeth forward and change the growth of the upper or lower jaws, or both. Most types of functional appliances braces are removeable and this treatment approach does not usually require extraction of any permanent teeth. Additional treatment with fixed braces may be necessary to ensure the best result.An alternative approach is to provide space for the correction of the front teeth by moving the molar teeth backwards. This is done by applying a force to the teeth from the back of the head using a head brace (headgear) and transmitting this force to part of a fixed or removable dental brace that is attached to the back teeth. The treatment may be carried out with or without extraction of permanent teeth.If headgear use is not feasible, the back teeth may be held in place by bands connected to a fixed bar placed across the roof of the mouth or in contact with the front of the roof of the mouth. This treatment usually requires two permanent teeth to be taken out (one on each side). OBJECTIVES: To establish whether orthodontic treatment that does not involve extraction of permanent teeth produces a result that is any different from no orthodontic treatment or orthodontic treatment involving extraction of permanent teeth, in children with a Class II division 2 malocclusion. SEARCH METHODS: Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 10 January 2017), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library, 2016, Issue 11), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 10 January 2017), and Embase Ovid (1980 to 10 January 2017). To identify any unpublished or ongoing trials, the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (ClinicalTrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (apps.who.int/trialsearch) were searched. We also contacted international researchers who were likely to be involved in any Class II division 2 clinical trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of orthodontic treatments to correct deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened the search results to find eligible studies, and would have extracted data and assessed the risk of bias from any included trials. We had planned to use random-effects meta-analysis; to express effect estimates as mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals; and to investigate any clinical or methodological heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: We did not identify any RCTs or CCTs that assessed the treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusion in children. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is not possible to provide any evidence-based guidance to recommend or discourage any type of orthodontic treatment to correct Class II division 2 malocclusion in children. Trials should be conducted to evaluate the best management of Class II division 2 malocclusion.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Orthodontic Appliances, Functional , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Child , Humans , Overbite/therapy
6.
Clin Interv Aging ; 10: 751-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25931817

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between physical activity (eg, energy expenditure) and survival over 11 years of follow-up in a large representative community sample of older Brazilian adults with a low level of education. Furthermore, we assessed sex as a potential effect modifier of this association. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population-based prospective cohort study was conducted on all the ≥60-year-old residents in Bambuí city (Brazil). A total of 1,606 subjects (92.2% of the population) enrolled, and 1,378 (85.8%) were included in this study. Type, frequency, and duration of physical activity were assessed in the baseline survey questionnaire, and the metabolic equivalent task tertiles were estimated. The follow-up time was 11 years (1997-2007), and the end point was mortality. Deaths were reported by next of kin during the annual follow-up interview and ascertained through the Brazilian System of Information on Mortality, Brazilian Ministry of Health. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were estimated by Cox proportional-hazard models, and potential confounders were considered. RESULTS: A statistically significant interaction (P<0.03) was found between sex and energy expenditure. Among older men, increases in levels of physical activity were associated with reduced mortality risk. The hazard ratios were 0.59 (95% CI 0.43-0.81) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.34-0.66) for the second and third tertiles, respectively. Among older women, there was no significant association between physical activity and mortality. CONCLUSION: It was possible to observe the effect of physical activity in reducing mortality risk, and there was a significant interaction between sex and energy expenditure, which should be considered in the analysis of this association in different populations.


Subject(s)
Energy Metabolism , Exercise , Mortality , Aged , Aging , Brazil/epidemiology , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Behavior , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
7.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 69(9): 1117-21, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25116923

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cognitive decline is a major risk factor for disability, dementia, and death. The use of Internet/E-mail, also known as digital literacy, might decrease dementia incidence among the older population. The aim was to investigate whether digital literacy might be associated with decreased cognitive decline in older adulthood. METHODS: Data from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging cohort with 6,442 participants aged 50-89 years, followed for 8 years, with baseline cognitive testing and four additional time points. The main outcome variable was the relative percentage change in delayed recall from a 10-word-list learning task across five separate measurement points. In addition to digital literacy, socioeconomic variables, including wealth and education, comorbidities, and baseline cognitive function were included in predictive models. The analysis used Generalized Estimating Equations. RESULTS: Higher education, no functional impairment, fewer depressive symptoms, no diabetes, and Internet/E-mail use predicted better performance in delayed recall. CONCLUSIONS: Digital literacy may help reduce cognitive decline among persons aged between 50 and 89 years.


Subject(s)
Aging/psychology , Cognition , Electronic Mail , Internet , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Depression , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mental Recall , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
8.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 142(2): 159-169.e9, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22858324

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Our objectives were to evaluate the evidence with regard to the effectiveness and stability of orthodontic treatment interventions for Class II Division 2 malocclusion in children and adolescents. This is a systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA statement. METHODS: The Cochrane Oral Health Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched to November 2011. Relevant conference abstracts were also screened. No language restrictions were applied. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies with at least 20 subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion in which comparisons were made with an untreated Class II Division 2 malocclusion group, another treated Class II Division 2 malocclusion group, or neither. For included studies ranked best on the hierarchy of evidence, assessments of methodologic quality and risk of bias were undertaken. Abstracts and, when appropriate, full articles were examined independently by 2 investigators. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Treatment changes and stability with or without retainers were measured with the following: skeletal, soft tissue, dental, and occlusal changes; gingival health; temporomandibular joint status and related muscular activity; and quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 322 studies identified in the search, 20 met the final inclusion criteria. All had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Highly biased evidence exists with regard to management and stability of Class II Division 2 malocclusion. Guidelines are proposed based on current evidence.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Public Health Dent ; 69(3): 176-81, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19486463

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare generic and condition-specific forms of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) in terms of their ability to discriminate between adolescents with and without normative need for orthodontic treatment. METHODS: A total of 1,060 15- to 16-year-old adolescents without history of previous or current orthodontic treatment were randomly selected from all secondary schools in Bauru, Brazil. Adolescents were clinically examined by using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). Normative need for orthodontic treatment was defined by using three different suggested cutoff values on DAI score; 28, 31, and 36 points. Two different estimates (overall score and prevalence of oral impacts) were calculated by using the generic and the condition-specific OIDP (CS-OIDP) attributed to malocclusion. Discriminative ability was assessed, comparing both estimates between groups. Effect size and adjusted odds ratios were used to interpret the magnitude and meaning of differences. RESULTS: The overall score and prevalence of oral impacts on quality of life in the last 6 months were significantly lower for the CS-OIDP attributed to malocclusion than for the generic OIDP (P < 0.001 in both cases). However, effect sizes and adjusted odds ratios were always larger for the CS-OIDP attributed to malocclusion than for the generic OIDP. CONCLUSIONS: Although generic and condition-specific OIDP forms were able to discriminate adolescents with normative need for orthodontic treatment from those without such a need, CS-OIDP attributed to malocclusion had better ability to distinguish between groups. Further studies are needed to compare discriminative ability of both OIDP forms between groups with different levels of other oral conditions.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion , Oral Health , Orthodontics, Corrective , Sickness Impact Profile , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Brazil , Esthetics, Dental , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Needs Assessment , Quality of Life , Sampling Studies , Social Class
10.
J Public Health Dent ; 69(3): 143-8, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19192103

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the level of agreement between two commonly used oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) measures, the short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP14) and the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP). METHODS: A sample of 1,675 15- to 16-year-old students attending all schools in Bauru (Sao Paulo, Brazil) was selected. The impact of oral conditions on quality of life in the last 6 months was reported using both OHIP14 and OIDP. To allow for comparison with the 100 percent OIDP score, OHIP14 scores were converted to percentages. Then, agreement between the two OHRQoL measures was analyzed using the Bland and Altman method. RESULTS: The mean difference between OHIP14 and OIDP was 6.48 percent [confidence interval 95% (6.08; 6.89)], with higher scores reported for OHIP14 than for OIDP. Besides, 95 percent of the differences between the two OHRQoL measures were between -10.59 and 23.56 percent. Finally, differences between OHIP14 and OIDP increased significantly as the magnitude of their average increased (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There was a moderate level of agreement between OHIP14 and OIDP, which may be partly due to the fact that both OHRQoL measures assess different levels of oral impacts on quality of life in addition to having different scoring systems.


Subject(s)
Oral Health , Quality of Life , Sickness Impact Profile , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Brazil , Female , Humans , Male , Psychometrics , Regression Analysis
11.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 6: 64, 2008 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18718004

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: At present, there is no evidence on whether using condition-specific Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) measures provides more reliable information than generic measures for needs assessment. Therefore, the objective was to assess the discriminative ability of one generic and one condition-specific OHRQoL measure, namely, respectively, the short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and the Condition-Specific form of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (CS-OIDP) attributed to malocclusion, between adolescents with and without normative need for orthodontic treatment. METHODS: 200 16-17-year-old adolescents were randomly selected from 957 schoolchildren attending a Sixth Form College in London, United Kingdom. The impact of their oral conditions on quality of life during the last 6 months was assessed using two OHRQoL measures; OHIP-14 and OIDP. Adolescents were also examined for normative orthodontic treatment need using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) and the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). Discriminative ability was assessed comparing the overall scores and prevalence of oral impacts, calculated using each OHRQoL measure, between adolescents with and without normative need. Using the prevalence of oral impacts allowed adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: There were significant differences in overall scores for CS-OIDP attributed to malocclusion between adolescents with and without normative need for orthodontic treatment when IOTN or DAI were used to define need (p = 0.029 or 0.011 respectively), and in overall scores for OHIP-14 when DAI, but not IOTN was used to define need (p = 0.029 and 0.080 respectively). For the prevalence of impacts, only the prevalence of CS-OIDP attributed to malocclusion differed significantly between adolescents with and without normative need, even after adjusting for covariates (p = 0.017 and 0.049 using IOTN and DAI to define need). CONCLUSION: CS-OIDP attributed to malocclusion was better able than OHIP-14 to discriminate between adolescents with and without normative needs for orthodontic treatment.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion/psychology , Oral Health , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Dental Health Surveys , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , London , Male , Orthodontics, Corrective , Poisson Distribution , Prevalence , Sickness Impact Profile
13.
Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Säo Paulo ; 28(4): 234-8, jul.-ago. 1986. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-33842

ABSTRACT

O efeito de concentraçöes subinibitórias de penicilina sobre a produçäo do antígeno grupo-específico e da hialuronidase extracelular foi avaliado em uma amostra de estreptococo pertencente ao grupo G de Lancefield. Em todas as concentraçöes uma maior quantidade de antígeno grupo-específico foi extraída das células e a atividade específica de hialuronidase se mostrou aumentada em até 1400% nos sobrenadantes das culturas. O maior aumento na expressäo de ambos os antígenos foi observado em 1/2 da CMI


Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/analysis , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/pharmacology , Penicillins/pharmacology , Streptococcus/drug effects , Streptococcus/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...