Guanosine prevents oxidative damage and glutamate uptake impairment induced by oxygen/glucose deprivation in cortical astrocyte cultures: involvement of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors and PI3K, MEK, and PKC pathways.

Glial cells are involved in multiple cerebral functions that profoundly influence brain tissue viability during ischemia, and astrocytes are the main source of extracellular purines as adenosine and guanosine. The endogenous guanine-based nucleoside guanosine is a neuromodulator implicated in important processes in the brain, such as modulation of glutamatergic transmission and protection against oxidative and inflammatory damage. We evaluated if the neuroprotective effect of guanosine is also observed in cultured cortical astrocytes subjected to oxygen/glucose deprivation (OGD) and reoxygenation. We also assessed the involvement of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), MAPK, and protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways on the guanosine effects. OGD/reoxygenation decreased cell viability and glutamate uptake and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in cultured astrocytes. Guanosine treatment prevented these OGD-induced damaging effects. Dipropyl-cyclopentyl-xanthine (an adenosine A1 receptor antagonist) and 4-[2-[[6-amino-9-(N-ethyl-ß-D-ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl] benzenepropanoic acid hydrochloride (an adenosine A2A receptor agonist) abolished guanosine-induced protective effects on ROS production, glutamate uptake, and cell viability. The PI3K pathway inhibitor 2-morpholin-4-yl-8-phenylchromen-4-one, the extracellular-signal regulated kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor 2'-amino-3'-methoxyflavone, or the PKC inhibitor chelerythrine abolished the guanosine effect of preventing OGD-induced cells viability reduction. PI3K inhibition partially prevented the guanosine effect of reducing ROS production, whereas MEK and PKC inhibitions prevented the guanosine effect of restoring glutamate uptake. The total immunocontent of the main astrocytic glutamate transporter glutamate transporter-1 (GLT-1) was not altered by OGD and guanosine. However, MEK and PKC inhibitions also abolished the guanosine effect of increasing cell-surface expression of GLT-1 in astrocytes subjected to OGD. Then, guanosine prevents oxidative damage and stimulates astrocytic glutamate uptake during ischemic events via adenosine A1 and A2A receptors and modulation of survival signaling pathways, contributing to microenvironment homeostasis that culminates in neuroprotection.

Neuromodulatory Effects of Guanine-Based Purines in Health and Disease.

The function of guanine-based purines (GBPs) is mostly attributed to the intracellular modulation of heteromeric and monomeric G proteins. However, extracellular effects of guanine derivatives have also been recognized. Thus, in the central nervous system (CNS), a guanine-based purinergic system that exerts neuromodulator effects, has been postulated. The thesis that GBPs are neuromodulators emerged from in vivo and in vitro studies, in which neurotrophic and neuroprotective effects of these kinds of molecules (i.e., guanosine) were demonstrated. GBPs induce several important biological effects in rodent models and have been shown to reduce seizures and pain, stabilize mood disorder behavior and protect against gliomas and diseases related with aging, such as ischemia or Parkinson and Alzheimer diseases. In vitro studies to evaluate the protective and trophic effects of guanosine, and of the nitrogenous base guanine, have been fundamental for understanding the mechanisms of action of GBPs, as well as the signaling pathways involved in their biological roles. Conversely, although selective binding sites for guanosine have been identified in the rat brain, GBP receptors have not been still described. In addition, GBP neuromodulation may depend on the capacity of GBPs to interact with well-known membrane proteins in glutamatergic and adenosinergic systems. Overall, in this review article, we present up-to-date GBP biology, focusing mainly on the mechanisms of action that may lead to the neuromodulator role of GBPs observed in neurological disorders.

Atorvastatin Promotes Cytotoxicity and Reduces Migration and Proliferation of Human A172 Glioma Cells.

Malignant gliomas have resistance mechanisms to chemotherapy that enable tumor invasiveness and aggressiveness. Alternative therapies in cancer treatment, as statins, have been suggested to decrease proliferation, inhibit cell migration, and induce cell death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of atorvastatin (ATOR) on cell viability, migration, proliferation, apoptosis, and autophagy in A172 human glioma cells. Temozolomide (TMZ), a chemotherapic used to glioma treatment, was tested as a comparison to cytotoxic effects on gliomas. Cell viability was also assessed in primary culture of cortical astrocytes. ATOR treatment (0.1 to 20 µM) did not alter astrocytic viability. However, in glioma cells, ATOR showed cytotoxic effect at 10 and 20 µM concentrations. TMZ (500 µM) reduced cell viability similarly to ATOR, and drug association did not show additive effect on cell viability. ATOR, TMZ, and their association decreased cell migration. ATOR also decreased glioma cell proliferation. ATOR increased apoptosis, and TMZ association showed a potentiation effect, enhancing it. ATOR and TMZ treatment increased acidic vesicular organelle (AVO) presence in A172 cells, an indicative of autophagy. ATOR effect of reducing A172 cell viability did not alter glutamate transport and glutamine synthetase activity, but it was partially prevented through antagonism of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors. Our data shows a cytotoxic effect of ATOR on glioma cells, whereas no toxicity was observed to astrocytes. ATOR showed similar cytotoxic effect as TMZ to glioma cells, and it may be a safer drug, regarding side effect induction, than chemotherapic agents.

Guanosine promotes cytotoxicity via adenosine receptors and induces apoptosis in temozolomide-treated A172 glioma cells.

Gliomas are a malignant tumor group whose patients have survival rates around 12 months. Among the treatments are the alkylating agents as temozolomide (TMZ), although gliomas have shown multiple resistance mechanisms for chemotherapy. Guanosine (GUO) is an endogenous nucleoside involved in extracellular signaling that presents neuroprotective effects and also shows the effect of inducing differentiation in cancer cells. The chemotherapy allied to adjuvant drugs are being suggested as a novel approach in gliomas treatment. In this way, this study evaluated whether GUO presented cytotoxic effects on human glioma cells as well as GUO effects in association with a classical chemotherapeutic compound, TMZ. Classical parameters of tumor aggressiveness, as alterations on cell viability, type of cell death, migration, and parameters of glutamatergic transmission, were evaluated. GUO (500 and 1000 µM) decreases the A172 glioma cell viability after 24, 48, or 72 h of treatment. TMZ alone or GUO plus TMZ also reduced glioma cell viability similarly. GUO combined with TMZ showed a potentiation effect of increasing apoptosis in A172 glioma cells, and a similar pattern was observed in reducing mitochondrial membrane potential. GUO per se did not elevate the acidic vesicular organelles occurrence, but TMZ or GUO plus TMZ increased this autophagy hallmark. GUO did not alter glutamate transport per se, but it prevented TMZ-induced glutamate release. GUO or TMZ did not alter glutamine synthetase activity. Pharmacological blockade of glutamate receptors did not change GUO effect on glioma viability. GUO cytotoxicity was partially prevented by adenosine receptor (A1R and A2AR) ligands. These results point to a cytotoxic effect of GUO on A172 glioma cells and suggest an anticancer effect of GUO as a putative adjuvant treatment, whose mechanism needs to be unraveled.

Atorvastatin Prevents Cognitive Deficits Induced by Intracerebroventricular Amyloid-ß1-40 Administration in Mice: Involvement of Glutamatergic and Antioxidant Systems.

Deposition of amyloid-ß (Aß) peptides into specific encephalic structures has been pointed as an important event related to Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis and associated with activation of glial cells, neuroinflammation, oxidative responses, and cognitive deficits. Aß-induced pro-oxidative damage may regulate the activity of glutamate transporters, leading to reduced glutamate uptake and, as a consequence, excitotoxic events. Herein, we evaluated the effects of the pretreatment of atorvastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, on behavioral and biochemical alterations induced by a single intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of aggregated Aß1-40 in mice. Atorvastatin (10 mg/kg/day, p.o.) was administered through seven consecutive days before Aß1-40 administration. Aß1-40 caused significant cognitive impairment in the object-place recognition task (2 weeks after the i.c.v. injection) and this phenomenon was abolished by atorvastatin pretreatment. Ex vivo evaluation of glutamate uptake into hippocampal and cerebral cortices slices showed atorvastatin, and Aß1-40 decreased hippocampal and cortical Na(+)-dependent glutamate uptake. However, Aß1-40 increased Na(+)-independent glutamate uptake and it was prevented by atorvastatin in prefrontal cortex slices. Moreover, Aß1-40 treatment significantly increased the cerebrocortical activities of glutathione reductase and glutathione peroxidase and these events were blunted by atorvastatin pretreatment. Reduced or oxidized glutathione levels were not altered by Aß1-40 and/or atorvastatin treatment. These results extend the notion of the protective action of atorvastatin against neuronal toxicity induced by Aß1-40 demonstrating that a pretreatment with atorvastatin prevents the spatial learning and memory deficits induced by Aß in rodents and promotes changes in glutamatergic and antioxidant systems mainly in prefrontal cortex.

Simvastatin impairs murine melanoma growth.

BACKGROUND: Statins induces cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, reduction of angiogenic factors, inhibition of the endothelial growth factor, impairing tissue adhesion and attenuation of the resistance mechanisms. The aim of this study was evaluate the anti-tumoral activity of simvastatin in a B16F10 melanoma-mouse model. METHODS: Melanoma cells were treated with different concentrations of simvastatin and assessed by viability methods. Melanoma cells (5 × 10(4)) were implanted in two month old C57Bl6/J mice. Around 7 days after cells injection, the oral treatments were started with simvastatin (5 mg/kg/day, p.o.). Tumor size, hematological and biochemical analyses were evaluated. RESULTS: Simvastatin at a concentration of 0.8 µM, 1.2 µM and 1.6 µM had toxic effect. Concentration of 1.6 µM induced a massive death in the first 24 h of incubation. Simvastatin at 0.8 µM induces early cell cycle arrest in G0/G1, followed by increase of hypodiploidy. Tumor size were evaluated and the difference of treated group and control, after ten days, demonstrates that simvastatin inhibited the tumor expansion in 68%. CONCLUSION: Simvastatin at 1.6 µM, presented cytototoxicity after 72 h of treatment, with an intense death. In vivo, simvastatin being potentially useful as an antiproliferative drug, with an impairment of growth after ten days.

Simvastatin impairs murine melanoma growth

Statins induces cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, reduction of angiogenic factors, inhibition of theendothelial growth factor, impairing tissue adhesion and attenuation of the resistance mechanisms. The aim of thisstudy was evaluate the anti-tumoral activity of simvastatin in a B16F10 melanoma-mouse model.Melanoma cells were treated with different concentrations of simvastatin and assessed by viabilitymethods. Melanoma cells (5 ~ 104) were implanted in two month old C57Bl6/J mice. Around 7 days after cellsinjection, the oral treatments were started with simvastatin (5 mg/kg/day, p.o.). Tumor size, hematological andbiochemical analyses were evaluated.Simvastatin at a concentration of 0.8 ƒÊM, 1.2 ƒÊM and 1.6 ƒÊM had toxic effect. Concentration of 1.6 ƒÊMinduced a massive death in the first 24 h of incubation. Simvastatin at 0.8 ƒÊM induces early cell cycle arrest in G0/G1, followed by increase of hypodiploidy. Tumor size were evaluated and the difference of treated group andcontrol, after ten days, demonstrates that simvastatin inhibited the tumor expansion in 68%.Simvastatin at 1.6 ƒÊM, presented cytototoxicity after 72 h of treatment, with an intense death. In vivo,simvastatin being potentially useful as an antiproliferative drug, with an impairment of growth after ten days.