Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Biomed Mater ; 16(6)2021 09 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34492651

ABSTRACT

In order to support bone tissue regeneration, porous biomaterial implants (scaffolds) must offer chemical and mechanical properties, besides favorable fluid transport. Titanium implants provide these requirements, and depending on their microstructural parameters, the osteointegration process can be stimulated. The pore structure of scaffolds plays an essential role in this process, guiding fluid transport for neo-bone regeneration. The objective of this work was to analyze geometric and morphologic parameters of the porous microstructure of implants and analyze their influences in the bone regeneration process, and then discuss which parameters are the most fundamental. Bone ingrowths into two different sorts of porous titanium implants were analyzed after 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 incubation days in experimental animal models. Measurements were accomplished with x-ray microtomography image analysis from rabbit tibiae, applying a pore-network technique. Taking into account the most favorable pore sizes for neo-bone regeneration, a novel approach was employed to assess the influence of the pore structure on this process: the analyses were carried out considering minimum pore and connection sizes. With this technique, pores and connections were analyzed separately and the influence of connectivity was deeply evaluated. This investigation showed a considerable influence of the size of connections on the permeability parameter and consequently on the neo-bone regeneration. The results indicate that the processing of porous scaffolds must be focused on deliver pore connections that stimulate the transport of fluids throughout the implant to be applied as a bone replacer.


Subject(s)
Osseointegration/drug effects , Tissue Scaffolds/chemistry , Titanium , X-Ray Microtomography , Animals , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Rabbits , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/drug effects , Titanium/chemistry , Titanium/pharmacology
2.
Artif Organs ; 32(4): 277-82, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18370941

ABSTRACT

Porous titanium implants have been used to improve implant-bone attachment by the ingrowth of bone tissue within the porous structure. Despite the efficient bone adhesion of porous titanium implants, chemical bonds are required at bone-implant interface. These implants can become bioactive by a biomimetic precipitation process. The aim of this work was to enhance the bioactivity of pure porous titanium implants by biomimetic process. The samples immersed in a simulated body fluid promoted the nucleation and growth of calcium phosphate (Ca-P) crystals, such as hydroxyapatite (Hap), on the material surface. Scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses revealed that a Ca-P deposition occurred without the need of pretreatments to improve the surface bioactivity. This present study indicates the potential for growing a bone-like Hap layer on porous titanium implants by biomimetic processes.


Subject(s)
Biomimetic Materials , Biomimetics , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Prostheses and Implants , Titanium/chemistry , Biomimetics/methods , Body Fluids/chemistry , Calcium Phosphates/chemistry , Crystallization , Durapatite/chemistry , Materials Testing , Metallurgy , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Porosity , Powders , Prosthesis Design , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Surface Properties
3.
J. appl. oral sci ; 14(3): 213-218, May-June 2006. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-873216

ABSTRACT

O propósito deste estudo foi avaliar a reparação óssea ao redor de implantes de superfície porosa comparados com implantes de superfície rugosa, ambos confeccionados de titânio puro grau 2 por meio da técnica de metalurgia do pó. Os implantes foram inseridos em tíbias de coelhos. Foram utilizados neste estudo 7 coelhos machos, sendo que cada um recebeu 3 implantes de superfície porosa na tíbia esquerda e 3 implantes de superfície rugosa na tíbia direita. Os animais foram sacrificados 4 semanas após a cirurgia e os fragmentos das tíbias contendo os implantes foram submetidos à análise histológica e histomorfométrica, visando analisar a neoformação óssea na interface osso-implante. As médias ( por cento) obtidas na análise histomorfométrica foram avaliadas por meio do teste estatístico t-student de amostras pareadas com nível de significância de 5 por cento. Os resultados da análise histológica mostraram que a osseointegração foi obtida nos dois tipos de implantes com similar qualidade de tecido ósseo. Na análise histomorfométrica, verificaram-se médias de neoformação óssea na interface osso-implante de 79,69 por cento ± 1,00 e 65,05 ± 1,23 para os implantes de superfície porosa e rugosa, respectivamente, e foi observada diferença estatisticamente significante entre os dois tipos de implantes com relação à quantidade de neoformação óssea. Concluiu-se que os implantes de superfície porosa contribuíram para a osseointegração devido à sua maior superfície de contato na interface osso-implante


Subject(s)
Animals , Rabbits , Biocompatible Materials , Materials Testing , Osseointegration , Titanium , Hardness Tests , Porosity , Prostheses and Implants , Surface Properties
4.
J. appl. oral sci ; 14(3): 213-218, May-June 2006. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: lil-448197

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to analyze the bone repair around commercially pure titanium implants with rough and porous surface, fabricated using powder metallurgy technique, after their insertion in tibiae of rabbits. Seven male rabbits were used. Each animal received 3 porous-surface implants in the left tibia and 3 rough-surface implants in the right tibia. The rabbits were sacrificed 4 weeks after surgery and fragments of the tibiae containing the implants were submitted to histological and histomorphometric analyses to evaluate new bone formation at the implant-bone interface. Means ( percent) of bone neoformation obtained in the histomorphometric analysis were compared by Student's t-test for paired samples at 5 percent significance level.. The results of the histological analysis showed that osseointegration occurred for both types of implants with similar quality of bone tissue. The histomorphometric analysis revealed means of new bone formation at implant-bone interface of 79.69 ± 1.00 percent and 65.05 ± 1.23 percent for the porous- and rough-surface implants, respectively. Statistically significant difference was observed between the two types of implants with respect to the amount new bone formation (p<0.05). In conclusion, the porous-surface implants contributed to the osseointegration because they provide a larger contact area at implant-bone interface.


O propósito deste estudo foi avaliar a reparação óssea ao redor de implantes de superfície porosa comparados com implantes de superfície rugosa, ambos confeccionados de titânio puro grau 2 por meio da técnica de metalurgia do pó. Os implantes foram inseridos em tíbias de coelhos. Foram utilizados neste estudo 7 coelhos machos, sendo que cada um recebeu 3 implantes de superfície porosa na tíbia esquerda e 3 implantes de superfície rugosa na tíbia direita. Os animais foram sacrificados 4 semanas após a cirurgia e os fragmentos das tíbias contendo os implantes foram submetidos à análise histológica e histomorfométrica, visando analisar a neoformação óssea na interface osso-implante. As médias ( por cento) obtidas na análise histomorfométrica foram avaliadas por meio do teste estatístico t-student de amostras pareadas com nível de significância de 5 por cento. Os resultados da análise histológica mostraram que a osseointegração foi obtida nos dois tipos de implantes com similar qualidade de tecido ósseo. Na análise histomorfométrica, verificaram-se médias de neoformação óssea na interface osso-implante de 79,69 por cento ± 1,00 e 65,05 ± 1,23 para os implantes de superfície porosa e rugosa, respectivamente, e foi observada diferença estatisticamente significante entre os dois tipos de implantes com relação à quantidade de neoformação óssea. Concluiu-se que os implantes de superfície porosa contribuíram para a osseointegração devido à sua maior superfície de contato na interface osso-implante.


Subject(s)
Animals , Rabbits , Biocompatible Materials , Materials Testing , Osseointegration , Titanium , Hardness Tests , Porosity , Prostheses and Implants , Surface Properties
5.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 14(3): 213-8, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19089076

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to analyze the bone repair around commercially pure titanium implants with rough and porous surface, fabricated using powder metallurgy technique, after their insertion in tibiae of rabbits. Seven male rabbits were used. Each animal received 3 porous-surface implants in the left tibia and 3 rough-surface implants in the right tibia. The rabbits were sacrificed 4 weeks after surgery and fragments of the tibiae containing the implants were submitted to histological and histomorphometric analyses to evaluate new bone formation at the implant-bone interface. Means (%) of bone neoformation obtained in the histomorphometric analysis were compared by Student's t-test for paired samples at 5% significance level.. The results of the histological analysis showed that osseointegration occurred for both types of implants with similar quality of bone tissue. The histomorphometric analysis revealed means of new bone formation at implant-bone interface of 79.69 +/- 1.00% and 65.05 +/- 1.23% for the porous- and rough-surface implants, respectively. Statistically significant difference was observed between the two types of implants with respect to the amount new bone formation (p<0.05). In conclusion, the porous-surface implants contributed to the osseointegration because they provide a larger contact area at implant-bone interface.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...