Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent ; 43(6): 707-703, 2023 Nov 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37347610

ABSTRACT

Two fractured maxillary central incisors were restored via the crown fragment reattachment technique with adhesive systems and composite resin material. A long-term successful outcome was achieved after 4 years of follow-up. The patient presented with fractured maxillary central incisors, and a comprehensive intraoral and radiographic examination revealed that both teeth had extended crown fractures with no pulpal exposure (Class II, Ellis and Davey). The tooth fragments were thoroughly cleaned and inspected before being repositioned. Both fragments were in excellent condition with almost no pieces missing. Therefore, the proposed treatment was fragment reattachment. After verifying the repositioning and adaptation of the fractured fragments, a flowable composite was used to perform the reattachment procedure under rubber dam isolation. With modern dental adhesives, the reattachment of tooth fragments in good condition is considered a more conservative option for restoring tooth morphology, esthetics, and function. Although one tooth showed signs of irreversible pulpitis and required root canal treatment 2 weeks after the restoration, the clinical and radiographic evaluations at the 4-year follow-up visits confirmed the success of the restorative treatment. The restorations showed good functional and esthetic outcomes after 4 years of follow-up.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Tooth Fractures , Humans , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Dental Bonding/methods , Tooth Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Fractures/therapy , Resin Cements , Composite Resins , Tooth Crown
2.
Am J Dent ; 29(5): 255-260, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29178737

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the push-out bond strength (POBS) of two resin cement systems (total-etch versus self-etch) for cementing FRC (fiber-reinforced composite) posts in three different thermocycling aging periods (40,000; 20,000; and none) using thermocycling and three root levels (apical, middle, and coronal). METHODS: 60 bicuspid single rooted natural teeth were endodontically treated and post spaces were prepared to receive a fiber-post (RelyX FiberPost) cemented with either total-etch (RelyX Ultimate) or self-etch (RelyX Unicem) cement. Teeth were randomly allocated into six groups (n= 10): G1: Control (Ultimate without thermocycling); G2: Ultimate (20,000 cycles); G3: Ultimate (40,000 cycles); G4: Unicem without thermocycling; G5: Unicem (20,000 cycles); and G6: Unicem (40,000 cycles). POBS was determined by using a push-out test on a universal testing machine. Additionally, failure mode of each specimen was observed under a stereomicroscope at x40 magnification and scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination of selected samples. A nested general linear model was created for statistical significance P< 0.05. Post-hoc tests were carried out using pair-wise comparisons with a Bonferroni adjustment. RESULTS: No significant differences were found on the bond strengths between the resin cements (P= 0.856). Regarding aging effect, bond strengths of the 40,000 cycle groups (G3/G6) were significantly lower than 20,000 cycle groups (G2/G5). In addition, the POBS of the specimens collected from the coronal third of the roots were significantly lower than specimens from the apical third regardless of the type of cement used. Regarding types of failures, adhesive failure (post/cement) was significantly higher in total-etch groups (G1-G3) than the self-etch groups (G4-G6). Adhesive failure (dentin/cement) was significantly higher in self-etch groups than the total-etch groups. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Within the limitations of this study, the bond strength to root canal dentin of self-etch and total-etch cements demonstrated reliable results and was not affected by the type of resin cement. Simplification of technique is an evident advantage of these materials in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding/methods , Post and Core Technique , Resin Cements/chemistry , Tooth Root/surgery , Dental Etching , Dental Stress Analysis , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Materials Testing , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Tooth, Nonvital
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...