ABSTRACT
Introducción y objetivos: considerando que el residente de Pediatría no se forma en puericulturani en prevención y promoción de salud del niño sano en centros de Atención PediátricaPrimaria, ni para el tratamiento del niño que no precisa atención hospitalaria, se intentasaber si el residente debe formarse en Atención Primaria.Material y métodos: para ello se distribuyó una encuesta anónima dirigida a todos lospediatras que prestan la Atención Primaria en la ciudad de Valencia, a todos los pediatras delHospital La Fe y a todos los residentes de Pediatría de dicho hospital. Se preguntó: ¿Creesque el residente de Pediatría debe rotar también por un centro de Atención Primaria acreditadopara completar su formación? Y ¿por qué?Resultados: se obtuvo un porcentaje de respuesta del 44,7%. El 86% respondió sí, el13% no y el 1% en blanco. Dijeron sí el 90% de los pediatras (95% de Primaria y 83% dehospital) y el 50% de los residentes. Los encuestados respondieron a la segunda parte de lapregunta y aportaron su opinión respecto a los motivos a favor de la rotación en AtenciónPediátrica Primaria; el 29% aportó ideas respecto al programa de formación del residente. El13% que opinó que no debe rotar justificó su opinión y aportó ideas para la formación delresidente. Conclusiones: el 86% de encuestados opina que el residente de Pediatría debe rotar porAtención Primaria para completar su formación y el 17% reclama alargar a más de cuatro añosla especialidad de Pediatría
Introduction and objectives: considering that the resident physician in the specialty ofpaediatrics in Valencia never trains in Paediatric Primary Care centres and that he does notreceive any preparation in child care nor in aspects as preventive care and promotion of goodhabits in healthy children or the treatment of ill children who do not need hospitalization,our intention is to find out if residents should be trained in Paediatric Primary Care, accordingto the opinion of paediatricians and residents in paediatrics.Material and methods: for this reason, an anonymous survey was carried out directed toall paediatricians in Primary Care in the city of Valencia and to all paediatricians and residentsin paediatrics who practise hospital care in the Hospital La Fe. The questions were: Doyou think that a paediatric resident should train additionally in an accredited primary healthcare center in order to complete his training? Why?Results: a percentage of 44.7% answered. Eighty-six per cent answered yes, 13% no and1% blank. Affirmative responses were from 90% of the paediatricians (95% primary carepaediatricians and 85% hospital care paediatricians) and 50% of the residents. Those surveyedresponded to the second part of the question giving their opinion on the motives in favourof Paediatric Primary Care training. 29% offered ideas for the resident training program,the 13% against Paediatric Primary Care training, that justified with their opinions.Conclusions: 86% say the resident should be trained in Paediatric Primary Care and17% demand more than four years training in Paediatrics
Subject(s)
Humans , Internship and Residency , Training Support/trends , Primary Health Care/trends , Child Health Services , Health Care Surveys , Inservice Training/trendsABSTRACT
Cross reactivity describes the development of symptoms as a consequence of the presence of specific IgE to a protein without the subject having had previous contact with that protein. Cross-reactivity depends on factors such as the individual's immune response, the type and intensity of exposure and, above all, the type of allergen. The identification of pan-allergens, which are present in various animal and vegetable sources and which show great structural and sequential similarity, even among species with little taxonomic relation, explains the existence of distinct, well-defined cross-reactivity syndromes. Knowledge of these phenomena could have important diagnostic and therapeutic consequences.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Cross Reactions , Allergens/adverse effects , Animals , Antibody Specificity , Birds , Eggs/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Fruit/adverse effects , Fruit/immunology , Humans , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Latex Hypersensitivity/etiology , Latex Hypersensitivity/immunology , Models, Immunological , Pollen/adverse effects , Pollen/immunology , Vegetables/adverse effects , Vegetables/immunologyABSTRACT
La Reactividad Cruzada (RC) expresa el desarrollo de síntomas como consecuencia de la presencia de IgE específica frente a una fuente proteica sin que haya existido contacto previo con la misma. La RC depende de factores como la respuesta inmune del individuo, del tipo e intensidad de la exposición y, sobre todo, de la naturaleza del alergeno. En este sentido, la identificación de Pan-alergenos, presentes en diferentes fuentes de origen animal y vegetal, compartiendo una gran similitud estructural y secuencial, incluso entre especies taxonómicamente muy poco relacionadas, explica la existencia de diferentes síndromes de RC bien definidos. El conocimiento de estos hechos puede tener importantes consecuencias de tipo diagnóstico y terapéutico (AU)
Cross reactivity describes the development of symptoms as a consequence of the presence of specific IgE to a protein without the subject having had previous contact with that protein. Cross-reactivity depends on factors such as the individual's immune response, the type and intensity of exposure and, above all, the type of allergen. The identification of pan-allergens, which are present in various animal and vegetable sources and which show great structural and sequential similarity, even among species with little taxonomic relation, explains the existence of distinct, well-defined cross-reactivity syndromes. Knowledge of these phenomena could have important diagnostic and therapeutic consequences (AU)
