Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hum Cell ; 27(2): 85-93, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24368576

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to present the comparison of four different methods for urothelial cell isolation and culture and compare them to methods cited in the literature. Four different techniques were examined for urothelium isolation from rat bladders. Isolation effectiveness was calculated using trypan blue assay. Confirmation of isolated cell phenotype and comparison with native bladder tissue was confirmed using immunohistochemical (IHC), immunocytochemical (ICC) and immunofluorescence (IF) analysis. The method with bladder inversion and collagenase P digestion resulted in the highest number of isolated cells. These cells showed positive expression of cytokeratin 7, 8, 18, α6-integrin and p63. Our results and the literature review showed that the best method for urothelium bladder isolation is dissection of the epithelium layer from other bladder parts and digestion of mechanically prepared tissue in a collagenase solution.


Subject(s)
Cell Separation/methods , Urinary Bladder/cytology , Urothelium/cytology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Collagenases/metabolism , Integrin alpha6/metabolism , Keratin-18/metabolism , Keratin-7/metabolism , Keratin-8/metabolism , Male , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Regeneration , Solutions , Urothelium/metabolism , Urothelium/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...