Pigmented purpuric dermatosis in children: a retrospective cohort with emphasis on treatment and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the course and treatment of pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPD) in the paediatric population are limited. Although treatments for pigmented purpura are not well established, vitamin C and rutoside have been reported to be an effective treatment option and are widely utilized. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical course and utility of vitamin C and rutoside in paediatric patients with PPD treated at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago between 2008 and 2018. METHODS: A retrospective review of all children with PPD managed at our hospital between 2008 and 2018 was performed. Additional follow-up was obtained via telephone interviews. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients met inclusion criteria. The female: male ratio was 1.3 : 1, and the median age at diagnosis was 8.8 years (IQR, 5.7-12.9). Median follow-up was 7.13 months (IQR, 3-17.4). The most common PPD subtypes were lichen aureus (43%) and Schamberg (34%). Fifty-three (52%) patients had evaluable follow-up documentation via their medical record or phone questionnaire. Twenty-eight patients were treated with vitamin C or rutoside or combination therapy. Twenty-five patients received no treatment. Clearance of the rash was noted in 24 (45.3%) patients overall, including 10 (42%) patients in the treated group and 14 (58%) patients in the untreated group. Recurrence was noted in seven (13.2%) patients. Treatment with vitamin C and/or rutoside was well tolerated without side effects. None of the patients were subsequently diagnosed with vasculitis, coagulopathy or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. CONCLUSION: Pigmented purpuric dermatosis in children is a benign disorder with high rates of complete resolution. Treatment with vitamin C and rutoside is well tolerated, but in this cohort, there did not appear to be an advantage over watchful waiting without therapy.

Safety profile during initiation of propranolol for treatment of infantile haemangiomas in an ambulatory day-care hospitalization setting.

BACKGROUND: Propranolol is the mainstay of treatment for infantile haemangioma. Despite its good safety profile, it is not risk-free. Guidelines for propranolol initiation and monitoring have been suggested, but protocols vary among practitioners. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the prevalence of adverse events and clinically significant fluctuations in haemodynamic parameters in children with infantile haemangioma during initiation of treatment with propranolol in a day-hospitalization setting. METHODS: Children with infantile haemangioma treated with propranolol in a day-hospitalization department of a tertiary paediatric medical centre in 2008-2014 were identified retrospectively. The pretreatment evaluation included clinical examination by a paediatric dermatologist and electrocardiography, echocardiography and clinical examination by a paediatric cardiologist. The propranolol dosage was escalated from 0.5 mg/kg/day to 2 mg/kg/day, divided into three doses/day, over 3 days. Heart rate, blood pressure and blood glucose level were measured before treatment onset and 60 min after the first two doses each day. The third dose was given at home. RESULTS: The cohort included 220 children aged 1 month to 5 years. No severe treatment-related adverse events were documented; 27 patients had minor side-effects. There was a significant decrease in heart rate each day after the first two doses (P < 0.001), and in systolic blood pressure, on day 2 (1 mg/kg/day) after the first dose (P = 0.01). Blood glucose level remained stable. The haemodynamic changes were clinically asymptomatic and did not require intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol treatment (2 mg/kg/day in three doses) for infantile haemangioma is well tolerated and safe and may be administered and monitored in an ambulatory setting.