Suboptimal visual outcome after femto-LASIK ablation in a high myopic patient.

A 28-year-old nurse had an aberration-free femto-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed for her myopia of -6.25 -0.50 × 096 and -6.75 -0.50 × 175 in the right and left eye, respectively. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) preoperatively was 20/16. Preoperatively, there were no abnormalities on Scheimpflug imaging, and a pachymetry of 585 µm was measured in both eyes. Flap thickness was 115 µm. The patient was quite nervous during the surgery. Since the surgery, her uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and CDVA are suboptimal at 20/30 and 20/20 in the right eye, and 20/20 and 20/16 in the left eye. 3 months postoperatively, there is a stable manifest refraction of +0.25 -1.25 × 030 and +0.25 -0.00 × 0. The keratometric astigmatism in the Scheimpflug imaging is 1.2 diopter (D) × 114 and 0.4 D × 78 in the right and left eyes, respectively (FIgures 1 and 2). Thinnest pachymetry is 505 µm and 464 µm in the right and left eye, respectively. Her wavefront analysis shows refraction in a 6 mm zone of -0.99 -1.22 × 32 and -0.91 -0.36 × 136. The cycloplegic refraction is 1.25 -1.00 × 023 and +1.00 -0.25 × 006 (Figures 3 and 4). What is the cause of the suboptimal visual outcome in this case? What would be your treatment strategy to improve visual outcome?

Tear Fluid Inflammatory Proteome Analysis Highlights Similarities Between Keratoconus and Allergic Conjunctivitis.

Purpose: Keratoconus is characterized by the progressive thinning of the cornea, which leads to a cone-like appearance of the eye over time. Although conventionally defined as a noninflammatory condition, a number of recent studies have associated keratoconus (KC) with allergic conjunctivitis (AC) based on clinical parameters. This study aimed to consolidate this association by performing a proteomic analysis of tear fluid from patients with keratoconus and/or allergic conjunctivitis. Methods: Of 51 patients, 17 were diagnosed with KC, 17 were diagnosed with AC, and 17 were diagnosed with both KC and AC (combined). Nine of 34 patients with KC had a progressive form of the disease. Tear fluid samples (n = 51, one eye per patient) were collected by the Schirmer's strips. Tear proteins were extracted from the Schirmer's strips. Proteomic profiling of 384 inflammatory proteins was assessed by a multiplex proximity extension assay (Olink Explore 384 Inflammation Panel I). Results: A total of 384 inflammatory proteins were measured. Two hundred seventy-two of the 384 proteins passed stringent data cleaning and were compared among the patient groups. Compared to the 2 other groups, LGALS9 was upregulated uniquely in KC, whereas FGF19, PDGFB, HPCAL1, OSM, and FCAR were downregulated in KC. Similarly, TNFRSF4 and CCL13 were specifically upregulated in AC, whereas ectodysplasin A receptor (EDAR) was uniquely downregulated in AC. Conclusions: High-throughput proteomic profiling of tear fluid confirms the association between KC and AC on a molecular level and raise the importance of redefining KC as an inflammatory condition.

Traumatic cataract in a young patient with myopia.

A 36-year-old man was referred to our clinic because of traumatic cataract in his right eye, which had developed after being hit in the eye with a badminton shuttle as a child. He noticed that his vision in his right eye was gradually becoming worse. His refraction, corrected with spectacles, was -4.25 -2.00 × 115 in his right eye and -5.50 -1.50 × 57 in his left eye, with a corrected distance visual acuity of 20/32 and 20/20, respectively. Because of allergies, the patient never tolerated contact lens wear for more than 2 hours. On a slitlamp examination, we confirmed anterior subcapsular star-like cataract without any signs of zonulolysis. Optical biometry showed an axial length of 25.73 mm and 26.66 mm and an anterior chamber depth of 3.70 mm and 3.78 mm in the right and left eyes. Keratometric astigmatism measured by optical biometry was 1.56 diopters (D) at 30 degrees and 1.12 D at 138 degrees for the right and left eyes, and Scheimpflug tomography showed 1.1 D of regular astigmatism at 33 degrees in the right eye, and 0.9 D of regular astigmatism at 130 degrees in the left eye. The patient is a professional photographer and asked for a treatment that would still allow him to be able to perform his job: he wants to read all the buttons on the camera up close and focus on the scenery in the distance. What is your advice on this challenging case?