ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of bacterial coinfection upon ICU admission in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia patients, its microbiology, and impact on prognosis.The secondary objective was to identify risk factors for coinfection on admission. METHODS: Retrospective study, including patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted to the ICU.We defined bacterial coinfection by respiratory symptoms, radiological data, positive and clinically significant microbiological results in samples obtained in the first 48 h of admission and/or a determination of procalcitonin ≥ 0.5 ng/mL in the first 48 h.We evaluated demographic variables, comorbidities, SARS-CoV-2 infection data, severity scores, treatments received, need for respiratory support and outcomes (ICU and hospital mortality). RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were analyzed, 62 (34.1%) with bacterial coinfection.The most frequent microbiology was S. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae. 96.1% of the patients received antibiotic therapy on admission, 98.9% corticosteroids, 27.5% tocilizumab, and 7.7% remdesivir.85.7% required invasive mechanical ventilation.The SOFA score (OR: 1.315, 95% CI1.116-1.548) and the delay in ICU admission (OR: 0.899, 95% CI 0.831-0.972) were related to the risk of coinfection. Bacterial coinfection increases the risk of death in hospital (OR 2.283; 95% CI 1.011.5.151; p=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial coinfection is common in COVID patients admitted to the ICU and increases the risk of death. It is not possible to identify with certainty, at the time of admission, which patients do not benefit from antibiotic treatment.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Critical Illness , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , Intensive Care UnitsSubject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Androstenes/therapeutic use , HormonesABSTRACT
Revisar y actualizar los últimos protocolos en cáncer de próstata metastásico hormonosensible para mejorar su manejo clínico en la práctica clínica. Realizar un análisis de los datos y los protocolos más recientes en el cáncer de próstata metastásico hormonosensible según paneles de expertos en este ámbito. Actualmente se necesita un grupo de consenso nominal para unificar y mejorar las recomendaciones para el manejo de pacientes sensibles con cáncer de próstata metastásico. Este documento unifica y mejora el manejo de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata metastásico hormonosensible, con una metodología que combina datos cuantitativos y cualitativos, y basada en la participación de un amplio comité científico designado por la Asociación Española de Urología (AU)
To review and update last protocols in hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer for improving clinical management in routine. Evidence analysis available about recent updates protocols in hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer according to expert panel of clinicians about this field. A nominal consensus group for unify and improve the recommendations to the management of sensitive metastatic prostate cancer patients is currently needed. This document unifies and improve the management of patients with hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, with a methodology that combines data quantitative and qualitative and based on the participation of a broad scientific committee appointed by the Spanish Association of Urology (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Metastasis , Clinical ProtocolsABSTRACT
La terapia de privación androgénica (TPA) es el pilar del tratamiento del cáncer de próstata hormono-sensible metastásico (CPHSm). La adición de docetaxel o de nuevas terapias hormonales (abiraterona, apalutamida o enzalutamida) mejora la supervivencia global (SG) y es en la actualidad el estándar de tratamiento. Sin embargo, la decisión sobre el régimen específico que acompañe a la TPA debe ser discutida con el paciente teniendo en cuenta factores como las posibles toxicidades asociadas, la duración del tratamiento, las comorbilidades o sus preferencias, pues no hay evidencia suficiente para recomendar un régimen sobre otro en la mayoría de los casos. En este trabajo se resume la evidencia sobre el manejo del CPHSm y se aportan recomendaciones consensuadas sobre el tratamiento óptimo para añadir a la TPA en pacientes con CPHSm con especial atención al perfil clínico del paciente (AU)
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). The addition of docetaxel or new hormone therapies (abiraterone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide) improves overall survival and is currently the standard of care. However, the decision on the specific regimen to accompany ADT should be discussed with the patient, considering factors such as possible associated toxicities, duration of treatment, comorbidities, patient preferences, as there is no sufficient evidence to recommend one regimen over the other in most cases. This paper summarizes the evidence on the management of mHSPC and provides consensus recommendations on the optimal treatment in combination with ADT in mHSPC patients, with special attention to the patient's clinical profile (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Interdisciplinary Research , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Patient Safety , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Neoplasm Metastasis , Decision MakingABSTRACT
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). The addition of docetaxel or new hormone therapies (abiraterone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide) improves overall survival and is currently the standard of care. However, the decision on the specific regimen to accompany ADT should be discussed with the patient, considering factors such as possible associated toxicities, duration of treatment, comorbidities, patient preferences, as there is no sufficient evidence to recommend one regimen over the other in most cases. This paper summarizes the evidence on the management of mHSPC and provides consensus recommendations on the optimal treatment in combination with ADT in mHSPC patients, with special attention to the patient's clinical profile.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Hormones/therapeutic useABSTRACT
To review and update last protocols in hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer for improving clinical management in routine. Evidence analysis available about recent updates protocols in hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer according to expert panel of clinicians about this field. A nominal consensus group for unify and improve the recommendations to the management of sensitive metastatic prostate cancer patients is currently needed. This document unifies and improve the management of patients with hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, with a methodology that combines data quantitative and qualitative and based on the participation of a broad scientific committee appointed by the Spanish Association of Urology.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Urology , Male , Humans , Androgen Antagonists , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , HormonesABSTRACT
Introducción y objetivo: La ansiedad específica del cáncer (CSA) es la reacción psicológica más frecuente tras la prostatectomía radical (PR). Evaluamos la prevalencia de la patología psiquiátrica pretratamiento de cáncer de próstata mediante PR e identificamos la influencia de los diagnósticos psiquiátricos en la supervivencia y pronóstico en los pacientes. Material y métodos Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico observacional, 1.078 varones intervenidos mediante PR por cáncer de próstata órgano-confinado. Grupos: GP: pacientes con patología psiquiátrica previa a la PR; GNP: pacientes sin patología psiquiátrica previa a la PR, variables urológicas, oncológicas y psiquiátricas, estadística descriptiva y análisis multivariante. Resultados El 37,94% presentó algún diagnóstico psiquiátrico. Fue necesario tratamiento adyuvante de radioterapia (RT) en 27,83% y hormonoterapia (HT) en 23,38%; más frecuentes en GP. La supervivencia cáncer-específica fue superior en GNP. La ansiedad, depresión, insomnio, tabaquismo, psicosis y alcoholismo fueron los más frecuentes. La baja estadificación Tumor-Ganglios-Metástasis (TNM) y poca presencia de síntomas del tracto urinario inferior (STUI) e incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo (IUE) incrementó la probabilidad de ausencia de patología psiquiátrica. En GP aumentó la fatiga, disfunción eréctil y deterioro cognitivo tras la PR junto con RT y/o HT. A mayor edad y mayor antígeno prostático específico (PSA) al diagnóstico, aumentó el riesgo relativo de patología psiquiátrica y peor evolución. Los factores más relacionados fueron la PR, PSA, la edad y el tiempo de supervivencia. Conclusiones La patología psiquiátrica está presente en pacientes tratados mediante PR debido a cáncer de próstata, teniendo alto impacto en los resultados de supervivencia y pronóstico (AU)
Introduction and Objective: Cancer-specific anxiety is the most frequently reported psychological response after radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated the prevalence of pretreatment psychiatric pathology in patients with prostate cancer undergoing RP and identified the effects of psychiatric diagnoses on their survival and prognosis. Material and Methods Retrospective multicenter observational study including 1078 men treated with RP for organ-confined prostate cancer. Groups: GP: patients with psychiatric pathology prior to RP; GNP: patients without psychiatric pathology prior to RP. Urological, oncological and psychiatric variables, descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were included. Results 37.94% of patients presented a psychiatric diagnosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy was required in 27.83% and hormone therapy in 23.38%; being more frequent in GP. Cancer-specific survival was higher in GNP. Anxiety, depression, insomnia, smoking, psychosis and alcoholism were the most frequent. Low TNM and low presence of LUTS and SUI increased the probability of absence of psychiatric pathology. Fatigue, erectile dysfunction and cognitive impairment after RP with RT and/or HT were higher in GP. Older age and higher PSA at diagnosis increased the relative risk of psychiatric pathology and worse outcome. The most frequently related factors were RP, PSA, age and survival time. Conclusions Psychiatric pathology is present in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, with a high impact on survival and prognostic outcomes (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatectomy/methods , Anxiety/psychology , Mental Health , Neoplasm Staging , Survival Analysis , Prostatectomy/psychology , Retrospective Studies , PrognosisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Cancer-specific anxiety is the most frequently reported psychological response after radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated the prevalence of pretreatment psychiatric pathology in patients with prostate cancer undergoing RP and identified the effects of psychiatric diagnoses on their survival and prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter observational study including 1078 men treated with RP for organ-confined prostate cancer. Groups: GP: patients with psychiatric pathology prior to RP; GNP: patients without psychiatric pathology prior to RP. Urological, oncological and psychiatric variables, descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were included. RESULTS: 37.94% of patients presented a psychiatric diagnosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy was required in 27.83% and hormone therapy in 23.38%; being more frequent in GP. Cancer-specific survival was higher in GNP. Anxiety, depression, insomnia, smoking, psychosis and alcoholism were the most frequent. Low TNM and low presence of LUTS and SUI increased the probability of absence of psychiatric pathology. Fatigue, erectile dysfunction and cognitive impairment after RP with RT and/or HT were higher in GP. Older age and higher PSA at diagnosis increased the relative risk of psychiatric pathology and worse outcome. The most frequently related factors were RP, PSA, age and survival time. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric pathology is present in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, with a high impact on survival and prognostic outcomes.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Introducción y objetivo: La supervivencia y calidad de vida (QoL) de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración no metastásico (CPRCnm) se deteriora de forma muy significativa cuando llegan a desarrollar metástasis. Los antiandrógenos de nueva generación (apalutamida, enzalutamida y darolutamida) pueden prolongar la supervivencia libre de metástasis (SLM) y la supervivencia global (SG) en estos pacientes, manteniendo su QoL.Material y método: Tras una revisión sistemática de la literatura, un comité científico alcanzó un consenso sobre recomendaciones sencillas y prácticas que unifiquen y mejoren el manejo de los pacientes con CPRCnm en las consultas de urología.Resultados: Se dan recomendaciones sobre la frecuencia de determinación de antígeno prostático específico (PSA) y pruebas de imagen en pacientes con CPRCnm. También se destaca la importancia de las comorbilidades en el paciente con CPRCnm y se ofrecen recomendaciones sobre la valoración funcional y de la QoL que se pueden llevar a cabo en la consulta de urología. Se revisa la eficacia, seguridad y efectos sobre la QoL de los antiandrógenos de nueva generación.Conclusiones: Para la evaluación del tratamiento de pacientes con CPRCnm, es necesario tener en cuenta no solo la edad, sino también las comorbilidades y la QoL. Los antiandrógenos de nueva generación son una opción de tratamiento segura y eficaz en los pacientes con CPRCnm. Las recomendaciones de trabajo pueden servir de ayuda para optimizar su manejo de los pacientes con CPRCnm en las consultas de urología. (AU)
Introduction and objective: Survival and quality of life (QoL) of patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) deteriorate significantly when they develop metastases. New generation antiandrogens (apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide) can prolong metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in these patients, maintaining their QoL.Material and methods: After the performance of a systematic review of the literature, a scientific committee reached a consensus on simple and practical recommendations to consolidate and improve the management of patients with nmCRPC in urology consultations.Results: Recommendations are made on the frequency of PSA determination and imaging tests in patients with nmCRPC. The importance of co-morbidities in patients with nmCRPC is also highlighted, and recommendations are also made on functional and QoL assessment that can be carried out during urology consultations. The efficacy, safety, and effects on QoL of new generation antiandrogens are reviewed.Conclusions: To evaluate treatment of patients with nmCRPC, it is necessary to consider co-morbidities and QoL, in addition to age. New generation antiandrogens are a safe and effective treatment option for patients with nmCRPC. The recommendations of this review can be helpful in optimizing the management of nmCRPC patients in urology consultations. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Survival Analysis , Quality of Life , ProstatectomyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Survival and quality of life (QoL) of patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) deteriorate significantly when they develop metastases. New generation antiandrogens (apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide) can prolong metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in these patients, maintaining their QoL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After the performance of a systematic review of the literature, a scientific committee reached a consensus on simple and practical recommendations to consolidate and improve the management of patients with nmCRPC in urology consultations. RESULTS: Recommendations are made on the frequency of PSA determination and imaging tests in patients with nmCRPC. The importance of co-morbidities in patients with nmCRPC is also highlighted, and recommendations are also made on functional and QoL assessment that can be carried out during urology consultations. The efficacy, safety, and effects on QoL of new generation antiandrogens are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: To evaluate treatment of patients with nmCRPC, it is necessary to consider co-morbidities and QoL, in addition to age. New generation antiandrogens are a safe and effective treatment option for patients with nmCRPC. The recommendations of this review can be helpful in optimizing the management of nmCRPC patients in urology consultations.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Androgen Antagonists , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Introduction: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex pathology with thousands of patients worldwide. During the acute early phase, neural tissue shows some regenerative properties that disappear at the chronic phase. Shock Waves and Stem Cells have been proposed as a possible therapy. Methods: Here, we analyse Shock Waves immediate effect over spinal cord genetic response in the injured and healthy spinal cord and the effect of Shock Waves and combined Shock Waves plus Stem Cells distally grafted to treat the first month after spinal cord injury. Results: The immediate application of shock waves increases VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) but reduces the BDNF (Brain-Derived Growth Factor) RNA (Ribonucleic acid) response. Shock wave therapy increases GFAP (Glial fibrillary acidic protein) positive cells and vascularity during the treatment's acute phase. Conclusion: Shock wave treatment seems to be enough to produce benefits in the acute phase of spinal cord injury, with no accumulative positive effects when mesenchymal stem cell graft is applied together.(AU)
Introducción: La lesión medular es una afección compleja con miles de pacientes repartidos a lo largo del mundo. Durante la fase aguda temprana de la lesión, el tejido neural muestras ciertas propiedades regenerativas que desaparecen durante la fase crónica. Las ondas de choque y las células madre han sido propuestas como posibles terapias. Metodología: En este estudio analizamos el efecto inmediato de una sesión de ondas de choque sobre la médula espinal, tanto sana como lesionada, y si su efecto es sumatorio al que produce un tratamiento de células madre mesenquimales inyectadas distalmente, como se ha observado en estudios previos. Resultados: Se observa un efecto inmediato con las ondas de choque que promueve un incremento del efecto trófico vascular endotelial, y una disminución del factor trófico derivado del cerebro. La terapia prolongada con ondas de choque en la fase aguda incrementa la presencia de astrocitos y la vascularización local. No parece haber efecto sumatorio con el tratamiento de células madre, produciéndose efectos similares con o sin las células madre mesenquimales. Conclusiones: Las ondas de choque parecen tener un efecto positivo durante la fase aguda de una lesión medular por compresión, sin que el tratamiento distal de células madre mesenquimales parezca implicar un efecto sumatorio.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , High-Energy Shock Waves , Spinal Cord Injuries , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Rehabilitation , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex pathology with thousands of patients worldwide. During the acute early phase, neural tissue shows some regenerative properties that disappear at the chronic phase. Shock Waves and Stem Cells have been proposed as a possible therapy. METHODS: Here, we analyse Shock Waves' immediate effect over spinal cord genetic response in the injured and healthy spinal cord and the effect of Shock Waves and combined Shock Waves plus Stem Cells distally grafted to treat the first month after spinal cord injury. RESULTS: The immediate application of shock waves increases VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) but reduces the BDNF (Brain-Derived Growth Factor) RNA (Ribonucleic acid) response. Shock wave therapy increases GFAP (Glial fibrillary acidic protein) positive cells and vascularity during the treatment's acute phase. CONCLUSION: Shock wave treatment seems to be enough to produce benefits in the acute phase of spinal cord injury, with no accumulative positive effects when mesenchymal stem cell graft is applied together.
Subject(s)
Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/pathology , Pilot Projects , Recovery of Function/physiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/metabolismABSTRACT
Fluid and vasopressor resuscitation is, along with antimicrobial therapy and control of the focus of infection, a basic issue of the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. There is currently no accepted protocol that we can follow for the resuscitation of these patients and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign proposes controversial measures and without sufficient evidence support to establish firm recommendations. We propose a resuscitation strategy adapted to the situation of each patient: in the patient in whom community sepsis is suspected, we consider that the early administration of 30mL/kg of crystalloids is effective and safe; in the patient with nosocomial sepsis, we must carry out a more in-depth evaluation before initiating aggressive resuscitation. In patients who do not respond to initial resuscitation, it is necessary to increase monitoring level and, depending on the hemodynamic profile, administer more fluids, a second vasopressor or inotropes.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: El objetivo del estudio consistió en describir los factores clínicos que llevan a los médicos a realizar pruebas de imagen para identificar metástasis en pacientes con cáncer de próstata (CP) resistente a la castración no metastásico (CPRCnm).MétodosEstudio observacional transversal realizado en los servicios de Urología de 38 hospitales españoles; 188 pacientes diagnosticados con CPRCnm sometidos una prueba de imagen para evaluar la presencia de metástasis fueron incluidos. Se solicitó a los médicos, en una única visita del estudio, que especificaran los factores clínicos que los llevaron a realizar estas pruebas. Se presentaron los resultados de las pruebas de imagen y las características clínicas de los pacientes desde el diagnóstico de CP. Se utilizaron análisis de regresión para determinar factores predictivos de los resultados de las pruebas de imagen.ResultadosEl valor del «prostate-specific antigen» (por sus siglas en inglés, PSA), fue el factor más importante que determinó la solicitud de pruebas de imagen (57,1%), seguido de un seguimiento habitual (16,5%) y del tiempo de duplicación del PSA (TDPSA) (12,0%). Aunque estos factores no guardaron relación con la detección de metástasis, los pacientes con una concentración de PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml tuvieron un mayor riesgo de metástasis que aquellos con una concentración <4 ng/ml (p=0,004), mientras que los pacientes con CPRC diagnosticados de metástasis (CPRCm) tuvieron una mayor mediana de concentración de PSA (20,9; intervalo intercuartílico [IIC]: 6,7-38,6) que aquellos con CPRCnm (9,1; IIC: 5,0-18,0) (p=0,005). Un 66% no se sometió a ninguna prueba de imagen entre el diagnóstico de CPRC y la visita del estudio (10,6, IIC: 4,0-19,5 meses). El tratamiento con intención curativa en el momento del diagnóstico de CP y la puntuación de Gleason predijeron un mayor tiempo transcurrido entre los diagnósticos de CP y CPRC. (AU)
Introduction: The aim of the study was to describe the clinical drivers that lead physicians to perform imaging tests in search of metastasis in non-metastasic castration prostate resistant cancer (nmCRPC) patients.MethodsObservational, cross-sectional study conducted at the Departments of Urology of 38 Spanish hospitals. The study included 188 patients diagnosed with nmCRPC who underwent an imaging test for the assessment of metástasis. In one study visit, physicians were requested to specify the clinical factors that led them to perform these tests. The results of the imaging tests and the clinical characteristics of the patients since the time of prostate cancer (PC) diagnosis, were reported. Regression analyses were used to determine predictors of imaging test results.ResultsProstate-specific antigen (PSA) level was the most important driver to order imaging tests (57.1%), followed by regular follow-up (16.5%) and PSA doubling time (PSADT) (12.0%). Although these drivers were not associated to detection of metastasis, patients with PSA levels ≥20 ng/mL had a greater risk of metastasis than patients with PSA levels <4ng/mL (P=.004) and CRPC patients diagnosed with metastasis (mCRPC) had higher median PSA levels (20.9; interquartile range [IQR]: 6.7-38.6) than nmCRPC (9.1; IQR: 5.0-18.0) (P=.005). Sixty-six percent of the patients did not undergo any imaging test after CRPC diagnosis until the study visit (10.6, IQR: 4.0-19.5 months). Curative-intent treatment at PC diagnosis and Gleason score predicted longer time from PC to CRPC diagnosis.ConclusionsPhysicians based their decisions to order imaging tests for metastasis detection in nmCRPC patients mainly on PSA and PSA kinetics, including the regular follow-up stated by guideline recommendations. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Physicians , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms , Neoplasm Metastasis , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to describe the clinical drivers that lead physicians to perform imaging tests in search of metastasis in non-metastasic castration prostate resistant cancer (nmCRPC) patients. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional study conducted at the Departments of Urology of 38 Spanish hospitals. The study included 188 patients diagnosed with nmCRPC who underwent an imaging test for the assessment of metástasis. In one study visit, physicians were requested to specify the clinical factors that led them to perform these tests. The results of the imaging tests and the clinical characteristics of the patients since the time of prostate cancer (PC) diagnosis, were reported. Regression analyses were used to determine predictors of imaging test results. RESULTS: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was the most important driver to order imaging tests (57.1%), followed by regular follow-up (16.5%) and PSA doubling time (PSADT) (12.0%). Although these drivers were not associated to detection of metastasis, patients with PSA levels ≥20 ng/mL had a greater risk of metastasis than patients with PSA levels <4ng/mL (P=.004) and CRPC patients diagnosed with metastasis (mCRPC) had higher median PSA levels (20.9; interquartile range [IQR]: 6.7-38.6) than nmCRPC (9.1; IQR: 5.0-18.0) (P=.005). Sixty-six percent of the patients did not undergo any imaging test after CRPC diagnosis until the study visit (10.6, IQR: 4.0-19.5 months). Curative-intent treatment at PC diagnosis and Gleason score predicted longer time from PC to CRPC diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians based their decisions to order imaging tests for metastasis detection in nmCRPC patients mainly on PSA and PSA kinetics, including the regular follow-up stated by guideline recommendations.
Subject(s)
Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of corticosteroids on inflammatory and respiratory parameters of patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Longitudinal, retrospective, observational study conducted in an ICU of a second level hospital. Adult patients with COVID-19 were included. Baseline characteristics, data on SARS-CoV-2 infection, treatment received, evolution of respiratory and inflammatory parameters, and ICU and hospital stay and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were included, 63% men, median age: 68.4 (51.8, 72.2) years. All patients met ARDS criteria and received MV and corticosteroids. After corticosteroids treatment we observed a reduction in the O2 A-a gradient [day 0: 322 (249, 425); day 3: 169 (129.5, 239.5) p<0.001; day 5: 144 (127.5, 228.0) p<0.001; day 7: 192 (120, 261) p=0.002] and an increase in the pO2/FiO2 ratio on days 3 and 5, but not on day 7 [day 0: 129 (100, 168); day 3: 193 (140, 236) p=0.002; day 5: 183 (141, 255) p=0.004; day 7: 170 (116, 251) p=0.057]. CRP also decreased on days 3 and 5 and increased again on day 7 [day 0: 16 (8.6, 24); day 3: 3.4 (1.7, 10.2) p<0.001; day 5: 4.1 (1.4, 10.2) p<0.001; day 7: 13.5 (6.8, 17.3) p=0.063]. Persistence of moderate ARDS on day 7 was related to a greater risk of poor outcome (OR 6.417 [1.091-37.735], p=0.040). CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids appears to reduce the inflammation and temporarily improve the oxygenation in COVID-19 and ARDS patients. Persistence of ARDS after 7 days treatment is a predictor of poor outcome.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Oxygen Consumption/drug effects , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , COVID-19/metabolism , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , Secondary Care Centers , Spain , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Bacteremia/diagnostic imaging , Bacteremia/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/diagnostic imaging , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ascites/therapy , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Biomarkers/blood , Diagnosis, Differential , Drug Therapy, Combination , Enterococcus faecium/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Linezolid/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Vancomycin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Conocer las últimas evidencias sobre Urología oncológica de tumores de riñón, vejiga y próstata. MÉTODOS: Se revisan los resúmenes sobre cáncer renal, de vejiga y de próstata (CaP) presentados en los congresos del año 2019 (EAU, AUA, ASCO y ESMO) y las publicaciones de mayor impacto en este periodo con mayor valoración por parte del comité del OncoForum. RESULTADOS: En pacientes con cáncer renal metastásico, los regímenes que incluyen inmunoterapia (nivolumab + ipilimumab, pembrolizumab) han mostrado ser superiores a sunitinib en términos de supervivencia. En pacientes con cáncer de vejiga no músculo-invasivo, pembrolizumab ha demostrado ser una alternativa efectiva en aquellos refractarios al bacilo de Calmette-Guérin, mientras que, en pacientes con cáncer urotelial metastásico, enfortumab vedotin en tercera línea logró una tasa de respuesta considerable (44%). En pacientes con CaP localizado, la radioterapia externa ultrafraccionada no mostró mayor toxicidad aguda que la radioterapia fraccionada o hipofraccionada. Se ha confirmado el beneficio de enzalutamida y apalutamida asociados a la castración en pacientes con CaP M1, independientemente del volumen de la enfermedad. En los pacientes con CaP resistente a la castración (CPRC) M0, el tratamiento con enzalutamida, apalutamida o darolutamida se ha asociado con un retraso de la aparición de metástasis y la prolongación de la supervivencia. Cabazitaxel ha demostrado un beneficio en la supervivencia de pacientes con CPRC metastásico, mientras que olaparib mostró actividad antitumoral tras la quimioterapia en aquellos tumores con mutaciones en genes de reparación del ADN. CONCLUSIONES: Estos datos ponen de manifiesto la incorporación de la inmunoterapia como alternativa novedosa para combatir el cáncer renal y de vejiga. Cabe destacar la llegada de nuevos agentes para líneas avanzadas en el carcinoma urotelial y queda establecida la eficacia de enzalutamida y apalutamida en CaP metastásico de novo. En el CPRC metastásico, cabacitaxel y olaparib (dirigido a mutaciones) son opciones terapéuticas prometedoras
OBJECTIVE: Review the latest evidence on urologic oncology on kidney, bladder and prostate tumors. METHODS: Abstracts on kidney, bladder and prostate cancer presented at the 2019 congresses (EAU, AUA, ASCO and ESMO) and the publications with the greatest impact in this period, with the highest evaluation by the OncoForum committee, are reviewed. RESULTS: In patients with metastatic kidney cancer, regimens including immunotherapy (nivolumab + ipilimumab, pembrolizumab) have been shown to be superior to sunitinib in terms of survival. In patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, pembrolizumab has been shown to be an effective alternative in those refractory to bacillus Calmette-Guérin, while in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer, third-line enfortumab vedotin achieved a significant response rate (44%). In patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa), ultrafractionated external radiotherapy did not show any greater acute toxicity than fractionated or hypofractionated radiotherapy. The benefit of enzalutamide and apalutamide associated with castration has been confirmed in M1 PCa patients, regardless of disease volume. In patients with castration-resistant M0 PCa, treatment with enzalutamide, apalutamide or darolutamide has been associated with a delay in the occurrence of metastasis and prolonged survival. Cabazitaxel has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with metastatic CRPC, while olaparib showed anti-tumor activity after chemotherapy in those tumors with mutations in DNA repair genes. CONCLUSIONS: These data show the implementation of immunotherapy as a novel alternative against renal and bladder cancer. The arrival of new agents for advanced urothelial carcinoma should be highlighted, and the efficacy of enzalutamide and apalutamide in de novo metastatic prostate cancer is established. In metastatic CRPC, cabazitaxel and olaparib (targeting mutations) are promising therapeutic options
