DNA quality evaluation of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded heart tissue for DNA methylation array analysis.

Archived formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) heart tissue from autopsied individuals represents an important resource for investigating the DNA methylation of heart tissue of deceased individuals. The DNA quality of FFPE tissue from autopsies may be decreased, affecting the DNA methylation measurements. Therefore, inexpensive screening methods for estimating DNA quality are valuable. We investigated the correlation between the DNA quality of archived FFPE heart tissue examined with the Illumina Infinium HD FFPE QC assay (Infinium QC) and Thermo Fisher's Quantifiler Trio DNA Quantification kit (QuantifilerTrio), respectively, and the amount of usable DNA methylation data as measured by the probe detection rate (probe DR) obtained with the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC array. We observed a high correlation (r2 = 0.75; p < 10-11) between the QuantifilerTrio degradation index, DI, and the amount of usable DNA methylation data analysed with SeSAMe, whereas a much weaker correlation was observed between the Infinium QC and SeSAMe probe DR (r2 = 0.17; p < 0.05). Based on the results, QuantifilerTrio DI seems to predict the proportion of usable DNA methylation data analysed with the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC array and SeSAMe by a linear model: SeSAMe probe DR = 0.80-log10(DI) × 0.25.

Angiotensin II does not acutely regulate conduction velocity in rat atrial tissue.

AIM: Atrial angiotensin II (Ang II) levels are increased in atrial fibrillation and are believed to be important in the pathogenesis of atrial arrhythmias. Ang II reduces intercellular coupling by inhibiting gap junctions (connexins) and may thereby increase the risk of reentry arrhythmia. The aim of the current study was to investigate the acute effect of Ang II on conduction velocity (CV) in atrial tissue from normal and chronically infarcted rats. METHODS: Contractile force was measured and CV was determined from the conduction time between electrodes placed on the tissue preparation. Expression of AT1a and AT1b receptors was examined by real-time PCR. RESULTS: Acute stimulation with Ang II did not affect CV in tissue from auricle or atrial free wall. A transient 6.5 ± 3.6% increase in resting tension was observed in atrial free wall preparations, indicating that receptors are present and functional in the free wall preparation. The difference between free wall and auricle was probably not caused by differences in receptor expression since equal amounts of AT1 mRNA were present. To test if myocardial infarction (MI) sensitizes the atrium to Ang II, free atrial wall from rats subjected to 4-5 weeks ventricular MI was examined. Although CV was significantly reduced by MI, no effect on CV of Ang II was seen. CONCLUSION: Ang II does not acutely regulate CV in tissue preparations from the free wall of the left atria or the left auricle. Although ventricular MI reduces CV, this does not sensitize the atria to Ang II.