Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
ISME J ; 2(1): 37-48, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18180745

ABSTRACT

Archaeal populations are abundant in cold and temperate environments, but little is known about their potential response to climate change-induced temperature changes. The effects of temperature on archaeal communities in unamended slurries of weakly acidic peat from Spitsbergen were studied using a combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), 16S rRNA gene clone libraries and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). A high relative abundance of active archaeal cells (11-12% of total count) was seen at low temperatures (1 and 5 degrees C), and this community was dominated by Group 1.3b Crenarchaeota and the euryarchaeal clusters rice cluster V (RC-V), and Lake Dagow sediment (LDS). Increasing temperature reduced the diversity and relative abundance of these clusters. The methanogenic community in the slurries was diverse and included representatives of Methanomicrobiales, Methanobacterium, Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta. The overall relative abundance and diversity of the methanogenic archaea increased with increasing temperature, in accordance with a strong stimulation of methane production rates. However, DGGE profiling showed that the structure of this community changed with temperature and time. While the relative abundance of some populations was affected directly by temperature, the relative abundance of other populations was controlled by indirect effects or did not respond to temperature.


Subject(s)
Archaea/classification , Archaea/genetics , Methane , Soil Microbiology , Archaea/isolation & purification , Arctic Regions , DNA, Archaeal/genetics , Gene Library , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Methane/metabolism , Methanobacterium/classification , Methanobacterium/genetics , Methanobacterium/isolation & purification , Methanomicrobiales/classification , Methanomicrobiales/genetics , Methanomicrobiales/isolation & purification , Methanosarcinaceae/classification , Methanosarcinaceae/genetics , Methanosarcinaceae/isolation & purification , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/classification , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Svalbard , Temperature
2.
Environ Microbiol ; 8(6): 984-96, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16689719

ABSTRACT

Effects of water regime on archaeal communities in Arctic soils from Spitsbergen were studied using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of amplified 16S rRNA genes, with subsequent sequencing of amplicons and ordination analysis of binary DGGE data. Samples with major differences in soil water regime showed significant differences in their archaeal community profiles. Methanomicrobiales, Methanobacteriaceae and Methanosaeta were detectable only in environments that were wet during most of the growth season, while a novel euryarchaeotal cluster was detected only in less reduced solifluction material. Group 1.3b of Crenarchaeota had a high relative abundance within the archaeal community in a wide range of wet soils. Along a natural soil moisture gradient, changes in archaeal community composition were observed only in upper soil layers. The results indicated that members of Methanomicrobiales were relatively tolerant to soil aeration. Differences in archaeal community composition associated with soil water regime were predominant over regional and seasonal variation, and over differences between individual wetlands. The results suggest that the observed 'on-off switch' mechanism of soil hydrology for large-scale variations in methane emissions from northern wetlands is at least partly caused by differences in the community structure of organisms involved in methane production.


Subject(s)
Archaea/classification , Soil Microbiology , Water , Archaea/genetics , Archaea/isolation & purification , Arctic Regions , Geography , Molecular Sequence Data , Norway , Phylogeny , RNA, Ribosomal/analysis , Seasons , Sequence Analysis, RNA , Soil/analysis
3.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol ; 53(1): 89-101, 2005 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16329932

ABSTRACT

Emissions of the greenhouse gas methane from Arctic wetlands have been studied extensively, though little is known about the ecology and community structure of methanogenic archaea that catalyze the methane production. As part of a project addressing microbial transformations of methane in Arctic wetlands, we studied archaeal communities in two wetlands (Solvatnet and Stuphallet) at Spitsbergen, Norway (78 degrees N) during two summer seasons. Directly extracted peat community DNA and enrichment cultures of methanogenic archaea were analyzed by nested PCR combined with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and subsequent sequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments. Sequences affiliated with Methanomicrobiales, Methanobacteriaceae, Methanosaeta and Group I.3b of the uncultured crenarchaeota were detected at both sites. Sequences affiliated with Methanosarcina were recovered only from the site Solvatnet, while sequences affiliated with the euryarchaeotal clusters Rice Cluster II and Sediment 1 were detected only at the site Stuphallet. The phylogenetic affiliation of the recovered sequences suggested a potential of both hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogenesis at both sites. At Solvatnet, there were clear temporal trends in the archaeal community structure over the Arctic summer season. The archaeal community composition was significantly affected by factors influencing the activity of the overall bacterial community, as measured by in situ emissions of CO2. Methane emissions at both sites were influenced more by peat temperatures and thaw depth than by the archaeal community structure. Enrichment cultures for methanogenic archaea determined that most of the methanogens detected directly in peat could grow in culture at 10 degrees C. Culture based biases were indicated in later enrichment steps by the abundant growth of a Methanosarcina strain that was not detected directly in peat samples.


Subject(s)
Archaea/genetics , Ecosystem , Phylogeny , Soil Microbiology , Arctic Regions , Base Sequence , Carbon Dioxide/metabolism , DNA Fingerprinting , Likelihood Functions , Methane/metabolism , Models, Genetic , Molecular Sequence Data , Norway , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Species Specificity , Temperature
4.
J Hazard Mater ; 93(3): 285-306, 2002 Aug 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12137990

ABSTRACT

A column study was conducted to determine if a permeable barrier can be used to treat creosote-contaminated groundwater based on sorption and biodegradation, and to determine which processes remove the various creosote compounds. Creosote-contaminated water (sterile and non-sterile) was applied to sterile and non-sterile saturated columns with peat (20 vol.%) and sand (80 vol.%) for 2 months. Temperature was 9 degrees C, inlet oxygen concentration 9-10mg/l and average residence time was two days. The peat/sand barrier material removed 94-100% polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), 93-98% nitrogen/sulfur/oxygen (NSO)-containing heterocyclic aromatic compounds, and 44-97% total phenols. The peat/sand material efficiently sorbed PAHs (>2 rings) and three-ring NSO-compounds, and also sorbed significant amounts of two-ring NSO-compounds and naphthalene. Naphthalene and NSO-compounds not sorbed were biological degraded. Phenol and cresols were efficiently removed by microbial degradation. The barrier material was somewhat less efficient removing dimethylphenols (DMPs) and trimethylphenols (TMPs), where DMPs were hardly sorbed and TMPs were hardly degraded. The results imply that a peat/sand barrier can treat creosote-contaminated groundwater. Modifications might be needed for enhanced removal of DMPs and TMPs, and oxygen supply might be necessary in aquifers with low oxygen content.


Subject(s)
Creosote/chemistry , Silicon Dioxide , Soil , Water Purification/methods , Water Supply , Adsorption , Biodegradation, Environmental , Filtration , Permeability , Water Pollution/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...