Infliximab Trough Levels Are Not Predictive of Relapse in Patients with IBD in Endoscopic Remission: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is important in optimizing use of biologics in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, the role of proactive TDM during remission remains uncertain. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients receiving infliximab (IFX) therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital or Erasmus University Medical Center. All eligible patients had completed induction phase of IFX and were in clinical and endoscopic remission. Our primary outcome was clinical relapse within 2 years after baseline. Multivariable regression models examined the association between infliximab trough levels during remission and relapse, need for IBD-related surgery or hospitalization. RESULTS: Our study cohort included 110 patients with IBD (72 CD, 38 UC) on IFX maintenance therapy. In total, 12 patients (10.9%) experienced relapse of disease over 2 years. The mean IFX trough level at baseline was 8.0 µg/mL (± 8.6) and did not differ between the institutions. 49.1% of patients had levels < 5 µg/mL and 2.7% had antibodies to infliximab at baseline. There was no difference in the mean IFX trough levels between patients who relapsed (7.5 µg/mL ± 3.7 µg/mL) over 24 months compared to those who did not (8.1 µg/mL ± 7.9 µg/mL, p = 0.815). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, IFX trough levels at baseline were not associated with relapse of disease over 24 months (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93-1.09, p = 0.856). CONCLUSION: This retrospective multicenter study provides evidence that IFX trough levels during quiescent disease do not predict relapse over 2 years, suggestive that proactive TDM in this setting is not warranted.

The impact of eculizumab on routine complement assays.

BACKGROUND: Eculizumab (ECU) blocks complement C5 cleavage, preventing the formation of C5a and the cytolytic effects of the membrane attack complex. The presence of ECU in blood impacts routine complement tests used to monitor treatment. METHODS: Residual serum samples with normal total complement (CH50) and residual citrate plasma with normal PT/APTT were spiked with ECU at varied concentrations ranging from 25 to 600 µg/mL. In addition, seventy-one samples from patients on ECU were obtained. Artificial and patient samples were analyzed for CH50 and C5 function (Wako Diagnostics), C5 concentration (Quidel), AH50 (Wieslab ELISA) and sMAC (Quidel). ECU concentration was measured by mass spectrometry for all patients. RESULTS: Complement blockage by ECU was evident in spiked artificial samples. At 25 µg/mL ECU, partial complement blockage was observed in CH50, AH50 and C5 function in serum. Complete blockage defined by undetectable AH50 (<10%) occurred at 100 µg/mL ECU. C5 concentrations remained the same regardless of ECU. sMAC results stayed around 81% of baseline in serum and 47% in citrate plasma with 50µg/mL ECU. Patient samples had ECU ranging from <5 to 1220 µg/mL. In all patients with ECU >100 µg/mL, C5 function was <29 U/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The spiked sera and patient samples showed complement blockage with CH50, AH50 and C5 function assays when ECU >100 µg/mL. CH50, AH50 or C5 function assays can serve as indicators for the pharmacodynamic effects of eculizumab. Allied to ECU concentration, laboratory studies may be helpful to tailor therapy.