ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The dental health of 73 workers previously exposed to mercury vapour at a chloralkali plant was studied and compared with that of 51 non-exposed referents. METHODS: A record of oral, periodontal, gingival and mucosal conditions, including teeth, restorations, prostheses, and oral hygiene, was established during a 30 min examination. The participants' periodontal conditions were assessed according to the community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN). The results with the CPITN index were also compared with previously published data for another similar population. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the exposed workers and the referents with respect to the number of remaining teeth, amount of amalgam restorations, crowns, bridges, or endodontically treated teeth. The oral hygiene among the exposed workers was significantly better than among the referents, but the periodontal health conditions did not significantly differ between the two groups, nor from those of another Norwegian population. DISCUSSION: The present results seem to contradict previous reports claiming tooth loss as a possible result of exposure to mercury vapour.
Subject(s)
Chemical Industry , Dentition , Mercury/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure , Oral Health , Adult , Aging/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oral Hygiene , Periodontium/drug effectsABSTRACT
Dental amalgam emits mercury, especially during setting. In addition, the preparation of the amalgam and its compaction into the cavity involve unbound metallic mercury or create a waste product with free metallic mercury. The present study was performed to explore whether emission of mercury in these situations would measurably influence the individual urinary mercury concentration of dental patients as a result of a single-session treatment with dental amalgam restorations. Informed consent was obtained from the patients of nine children about to be treated with amalgam restorations as part of their regular dental care. The children delivered a total of five morning urine samples before, during, and after the treatment period. No effect on the urine mercury concentration was found during the treatment period. Conclusively, one single session of amalgam treatment did not per se represent a mercury exposure of sufficient quantity to be detectable in a longitudinal, individual study.
Subject(s)
Dental Amalgam/adverse effects , Mercury/urine , Adolescent , Analysis of Variance , Bicuspid , Child , Creatinine/urine , Dental Restoration, Permanent/adverse effects , Humans , Molar , Time FactorsABSTRACT
The creatinine-adjusted urinary concentration of mercury in 73 schoolchildren with a mean age of 12 years was determined. In addition, the number of amalgam restorations and their size, prevalence of allergy, and days absent from school due to illness were recorded for each individual. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.55) was found between urine Hg and extent of amalgam restorations, but no correlation existed between urine Hg and allergy or between urine Hg and absence from school due to illness. Neither could any correlation be found between extent of amalgam restorations and either allergy or absence from school.