Late acetabular dysplasia after successful treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip using the Pavlik method: A systematic literature review.

The Pavlik method is the most common method used for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Late acetabular dysplasia despite successful treatment, however, has had varied reporting. A systematic review was performed, investigating the long-term outcomes of DDH treated with the Pavlik method. Seventeen studies met inclusionary criteria, including 6029 hips treated with an average of 5.29 years follow-up. Radiographic evidence of late dysplasia was present in 280 hips, with 109 hips requiring additional surgery. A specified treatment algorithm had significantly decreased rates of radiographic dysplasia (3.8% vs 17.6%, p = 0.004). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Fate of Patients With a "Surprise" Positive Culture After Nonunion Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Review the impact of unexpected positive cultures from definitive surgery for nonunion regarding postoperative treatment and ultimate result. DESIGNS: Retrospective multicenter case series. SETTING: Three level-one trauma centers. PATIENTS: Six-hundred sixty-six consecutive nonunions were treated during the study period. Four-hundred fifty-three cases (68%) were considered at risk for indolent infection (prior open fracture, surgery, or infection) and had cultures taken at the time of definitive surgery. INTERVENTION: Intraoperative cultures during definitive operative treatment of nonunions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The incidence of "surprise" positive cultures was determined, and the course of the patients was documented including the use of antibiotics, surgery performed, and the outcome regarding infection and union. RESULTS: Ninety-one (20%) cases had a surprise positive culture despite negative inflammatory markers. Most of bacteria isolated from the cultures were Staphylococcus species. Eight (9%) of the ninety-one cultures were considered probable contaminants and no antibiotics were given, 5 of these patients healed. The other 83 patients were treated with antibiotics, initially 66 (80%) healed and 12 (14%) remained infected. Eighty-two percent of patients with augmentation healed as compared with 86% of those not grafted. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of nonunions is challenging, and in patients with a history of surgery or open fracture, we found that 20% had positive intraoperative cultures from the definitive surgery. We recommend intraoperative cultures for all patients undergoing revision surgery. The use of culture-specific antibiotics is justified based on the overall low rate of infection in this complex population and the high rate of chronic infection (25%) for those treated as contaminants. Patients may be counseled that a positive culture after nonunion surgery is a treatable problem but does increase the risk of infection and additional surgery as compared with those with a negative intraoperative culture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Preoperative diagnosis of infection in patients with nonunions.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of a fracture nonunion is complicated in the presence of infection. The purpose of the present study is to report on the utility of a standardized protocol to rule out infection in high-risk patients and to evaluate the efficacy of each component of the protocol. METHODS: A single protocol of preoperative laboratory tests (white blood-cell count, C-reactive protein level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and a combined white blood cell/sulfur colloid scan were performed for patients with a high risk of fracture nonunion. Infection was diagnosed on the basis of positive intraoperative cultures, evidence of gross infection at the time of the procedure, or evidence of gross infection during the immediate postoperative period. With use of infection as the end point, univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to compare tests. A risk stratification method was used to combine tests. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with ninety-five nonunions were evaluated. Thirty of the ninety-five nonunions were ultimately diagnosed as being infected. With use of a combination of elevated white blood-cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein level and a positive scan, the predicted probabilities of infection associated with zero, one, two, and three positive tests were 18%, 24%, 50%, and 86%, respectively. With the elimination of the nuclear scan, the predicted probabilities for zero, one, two, and three risk factors were 20%, 19%, 56%, and 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the C-reactive protein level were both independently accurate predictors of infection. Use of a risk stratification method showed that the likelihood of infection increased with each additional positive test. A combined white blood cell/sulfur colloid scan was the least predictive method of revealing infection and is not cost effective, even as part of a stratification scheme. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level III. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.