The Migration Pattern of a Short-Tapered Femoral Stem Correlates with the Occurrence of Cortical Hypertrophies: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study Using Ein Bild Röntgen Analyse-Femoral Component Analysis.

Background: Shorter hip stems have shown promising mid-term results but lack long-term data. High rates of distal cortical hypertrophy (CH) have been described, suggesting a more diaphyseal load transmission. This study aimed to determine patient-specific and surgery-related factors influencing CH and their impact on 10-year outcomes. Methods: It included 100 consecutive total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using the Fitmore stem (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana), with clinical and radiographic follow-ups at 1, 2, 5, and at least 10 years post-surgery. Results: No revisions were performed due to aseptic loosening after a mean of 11.6 years (range: 10-13.5 years). CH was observed in 26% of hips, primarily in Gruen zones 3 and 5. There was no significant difference in the Harris Hip Score between patients with and without CH. Larger stem sizes and greater axial subsidence significantly correlated with CH occurrence (OD 1.80, (1.13-1.92), p = 0.004; OD 1.47, (1.04-2.08), p = 0.028). The Fitmore stem demonstrated excellent survival rates and favorable outcomes over 10 years. Conclusions: Despite a lower CH rate compared to other studies, significant correlations with stem size and subsidence were identified. This study underscores the importance of patient selection and achieving high primary stability to maintain the metaphyseal anchoring concept.

Which Knee Phenotypes Exhibit the Strongest Correlation With Cartilage Degeneration?

BACKGROUND: Although articular wear has been thoroughly investigated, the effects of abnormal limb alignment on cartilage degeneration over time remain poorly understood. An exact assessment of the correlation between lower limb alignment abnormalities and MRI-observed articular degradation may be helpful for understanding the progression of osteoarthritis and planning future treatment. QUESTION/PURPOSE: In patients with moderate to advanced osteoarthritis, (1) is there a correlation between overall alignment of the knee and the location of cartilage degradation over time, as measured by cartilage metrics on MRI? (2) Is there a correlation between tibial alignment and the location of cartilage degradation over time, as measured by cartilage metrics on MRI? (3) Is there a correlation between femoral alignment and the location of cartilage degradation over time, as measured by cartilage metrics on MRI? METHODS: Between April 2020 and September 2022, we retrospectively evaluated 3106 patients aged 45 to 79 years who were at risk of experiencing knee osteoarthritis. Of those, we considered as potentially eligible 600 symptomatic index knees with radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis-Kellgren-Lawrence Grades 2 or 3-at the baseline visit. Of those, 22% (134 of 600) were excluded because of a lack of proper alignment measurements, leaving 466 knees with measurements of radiologic alignment angles and quantitative MRI cartilage measurements of 16 subregions of the femorotibial compartment at baseline and 12 and 24 months, and 64 knees at the 48-month visit for investigation in the current study. Data regarding cartilage measurements of the patellofemoral compartment were not available for analysis. The knees were categorized into one of the possible 25 different phenotypes of the lower extremity established by previous research, based on the neutral, valgus, or varus distal mechanical angle of the femur and proximal tibial mechanical angle on full-limb radiographs. We applied ANOVA to estimate the effect size of the overall, femoral, and tibial alignments on the location of cartilage degradation over time, as measured by cartilage metrics on MRI. RESULTS: We found that the overall combinations of a valgus femur with valgus tibia or a valgus femur with varus tibia were associated with the highest loss of cartilage in the internal medial tibial subregion and anterior lateral tibial subregion (η 2 p = 0.39 and 0.17, respectively). For the tibia, we found that the combination of a valgus femur with valgus tibia was associated with an increase in the area of subchondral bone denuded of cartilage in the central lateral tibial subregion (η 2 p = 0.2). For the femur, we found that the combination of a valgus femur with valgus tibia was associated with loss of cartilage thickness in the central weightbearing lateral femorotibial compartment (η 2 p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: We found that certain alignment patterns are associated with rapid deterioration of cartilage and exposure of subchondral bone, even over short time periods. In particular, the valgus femur with valgus tibia and valgus femur with varus tibia phenotypes deserve special attention, because they exhibited a strong, atypical correlation with the internal medial tibial subregion and anterior lateral tibial subregion, respectively. This is important because valgus and varus malalignment cause isolated lateral and medial compartment disease, respectively. Therefore, these findings suggest that a more individualized approach for limb axis deformities is valuable, and hint at a more meticulous radiologic and clinical investigation, perhaps using different imaging modalities, especially when assessing the exact cartilage state and planning an intervention. Future studies, ideally biomechanical, might help in assessing the long-term effects of the various phenotypes on cartilage degradation and their relevance in reconstructive surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Against the Norm: Do Not Rely on Serum C-Reactive Protein and White Blood Cell Count Only When Assessing Eradication of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Introduction: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) following primary arthroplasty continue to be a serious complication, despite advances in diagnostics and treatment. Two-stage revision arthroplasty has been commonly used as the gold standard for the treatment of PJI. However, much discussion persists regarding the interim of the two-stage procedure and the optimal timing of reimplantation. Serology markers have been proposed as defining parameters for a successful reimplantation. The objective of this matched-pair analysis was to assess the role of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) in determining infection eradication and proper timing of reimplantation. We investigated the delta (∆) change in CRP and WBC values prior to both stages of two-stage revision arthroplasty as a useful marker of infection eradication. Methods: We analyzed 39 patients and 39 controls, matched by propensity score matching (BMI, age, ASA-classification), with a minimum follow-up of 24 months and treated with a two-stage revision THA or TKA in our institution. Data of serum CRP and WBC values were gathered at two selected time points: prior to the explantation of the implant (preexplantation) and following the completion of antibiotic treatment regimen, both systemic and with a drug-eluting cement spacer (prereimplantation). Patient records were reviewed electronically for preexisting comorbidities, overall health status, synovial fluid cultures, inflammatory serologies, revision surgeries, and recurrent or persistent infection based on the modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Patient demographics, ∆CRP, ∆WBC, and time interval to reimplantation were statistically analyzed using receiver operator curves (ROC), Pearson's correlation coefficient, Levene's test, and Student's t-test. Results: Infection-free patients exhibited higher mean CRP and WBC than did patients who were reinfected at both time points. When comparing preexplantation with prereimplantation values, the median ∆CRP was 9.48 mg/L (interquartile range (IQR) 2.3−36.6 mg/L) for patients who did not develop a reinfection versus 2.74 mg/L (IQR 1.4−14.2 mg/L) for patients who developed reinfection (p = 0.069). The median ∆WBC was 1.5 × 109/L (IQR 0.6−4.0 × 109/L) for patients who remained infection-free versus 1.2 × 109/L (IQR 0.8−2.2 109/L) for patients who developed reinfection (p = 0.072). Analysis of areas under the curve (AUC) using ROC demonstrated poor prediction of persistent infection by ∆CRP (AUC = 0.654) and ∆WBC (AUC = 0.573). Although a highly significant correlation was found between the interim interval and infection persistence (r = 0.655, p < 0.01), analysis using ROC failed to result in a specific threshold time to reimplantation above which patients are at significantly higher risk for reinfection (AUC = 0.507). Conclusion: No association could be determined between the delta change in serum CRP and WBC before and after two-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI and reinfection risk. Even though inflammatory serologies demonstrate a downtrending pattern prior to reimplantation, the role of CRP and WBC in determining the optimal timing of reimplantation seems to be dispensable. Planning a second-stage reimplantation requires assessing multiple variables rather than relying on specific numeric changes in these inflammatory marker values.