Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neth J Med ; 61(6): 226-7, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12948166

ABSTRACT

A 47-year old woman was admitted for adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy consisting of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. During the second course of chemotherapy an allergic reaction occurred after administration of epirubicin. Treatment with clemastine 2 mg iv caused a quick recovery and after 24 hours there was only a slight redness of the face. A discussion follows on allergic reactions to antracyclines and the literature is updated.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Epirubicin/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
2.
Circulation ; 107(4): 593-7, 2003 Feb 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12566372

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Serial ultrasonography is reliable for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic patients, but the low prevalence of thrombosis in this group renders the approach costly and inconvenient to patients. We studied the clinical validity of the combination of a pretest clinical probability score and a D-dimer test in the initial evaluation of patients suspected of deep venous thrombosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with a normal D-dimer concentration (<500 fibrin equivalent units [FEU] microg/L) and a non-high probability score (<3) had no further testing. Patients with a normal D-dimer concentration and a high probability score (> or =3) underwent one ultrasonogram. Serial ultrasonography was performed in patients with an abnormal D-dimer concentration. Patients were followed for 3 months. A total of 812 patients were evaluable for efficacy. Only 1 of 176 patients (0.6%; 95% CI, 0.02% to 3.1%) with a normal D-dimer concentration and a non-high probability score developed thrombosis during follow-up. A normal D-dimer concentration and a high probability score were found in 39 patients; 3 of them (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.6% to 20.9%) had thrombosis at presentation, and one (2.8%; 95% CI, 0.07% to 14. 5%) developed pulmonary embolism during follow-up. In 306 of 597 patients (51.3%) with an abnormal D-dimer concentration, thrombosis was detected by serial ultrasonography. Six patients (2.1%; 95% CI, 0.8% to 4. 4%) developed thrombosis during follow-up. No deaths due to thromboembolism occurred during follow-up. The total need for ultrasonography was reduced by 29%. CONCLUSION: The combination of a non-high pretest clinical probability score and a normal D-dimer concentration is a safe strategy to rule out deep venous thrombosis and to withhold anticoagulation.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Venous Thrombosis/blood , Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Leg/blood supply , Leg/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography , Venous Thrombosis/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...