Mass density images from the diffraction enhanced imaging technique.

Conventional x-ray radiography measures the projected x-ray attenuation of an object. It requires attenuation differences to obtain contrast of embedded features. In general, the best absorption contrast is obtained at x-ray energies where the absorption is high, meaning a high absorbed dose. Diffraction-enhanced imaging (DEI) derives contrast from absorption, refraction, and extinction. The refraction angle image of DEI visualizes the spatial gradient of the projected electron density of the object. The projected electron density often correlates well with the projected mass density and projected absorption in soft-tissue imaging, yet the mass density is not an "energy"-dependent property of the object, as is the case of absorption. This simple difference can lead to imaging with less x-ray exposure or dose. In addition, the mass density image can be directly compared (i.e., a signal-to-noise comparison) with conventional radiography. We present the method of obtaining the mass density image, the results of experiments in which comparisons are made with radiography, and an application of the method to breast cancer imaging.

Diffraction enhanced imaging contrast mechanisms in breast cancer specimens.

We have investigated the contrast mechanisms of the refraction angle, and the apparent absorption images obtained from the diffraction enhanced imaging technique (DEI) and have correlated them with the absorption contrast of conventional radiography. The contrast of both the DEI refraction angle image and the radiograph have the same dependence on density differences of the tissues in the visualization of cancer; in radiography these differences directly relate to the contrast while in the DEI refraction angle image it is the density difference and thickness gradient that gives the refraction angle. We show that the density difference of fibrils in breast cancer as measured by absorption images correlate well with the density difference derived from refraction angle images of DEI. In addition we find that the DEI apparent absorption image and the image obtained with the DEI system at the top of the reflectivity curve have much greater contrast than that of the normal radiograph (x8 to 33-fold higher). This is due to the rejection of small angle scattering (extinction) from the fibrils enhancing the contrast.

Diffraction-enhanced X-ray imaging of articular cartilage.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a novel X-ray technology, diffraction-enhanced X-ray imaging (DEI), in its early stages of development, for the imaging of articular cartilage. DESIGN: Disarticulated and/or intact human knee and talocrural joints displaying both undegenerated and degenerated articular cartilage were imaged with DEI. A series of three silicon crystals were used to produce a highly collimated monochromatic X-ray beam to achieve scatter-rejection at the microradian level. The third crystal (analyser) was set at different angles resulting in images displaying different characteristics. Once the diffraction enhanced (DE) images were obtained, they were compared to gross and histological examination. RESULTS: Articular cartilage in both disarticulated and intact joints could be visualized through DEI. For each specimen, DE images were reflective of their gross and histological appearance. For each different angle of the analyser crystal, there was a slight difference in appearance in the specimen image, with certain characteristics changing in their contrast intensity as the analyser angle changed. CONCLUSIONS: DEI is capable of imaging articular cartilage in disarticulated, as well as in intact joints. Gross cartilage defects, even at early stages of development, can be visualized due to a combination of high spatial resolution and detection of X-ray refraction, extinction and absorption patterns. Furthermore, DE images displaying contrast heterogeneities indicative of cartilage degeneration correspond to the degeneration detected by gross and histological examination.