The Role of Proximity to Coordinated Specialty Care For Early Psychosis And Program Engagement in Washington State: The Interaction of Travel Time, Race, and Ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE: Proximity to mental health services is a predictor of timely access to services. The present study sought to investigate whether travel time was associated with engagement in coordinated specialty care (CSC) for early psychosis, with specific attention to whether the interaction of travel time by race and ethnicity had differential impact. DATA SOURCE/STUDY SETTING: Data collected between 2019 and 2022 as part of the New Journeys evaluation, the CSC model in Washington State. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study included a sample of 225 service users with first episode psychosis (FEP) who had received services from New Journeys. DATA COLLECTION: Service users' addresses, and the physical location of CSC were geocoded. Spatial proximity was calculated as travel time in minutes. Scheduled appointments, attendance and program status were captured monthly by clinicians as part of the New Journeys measurement battery. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Proximity was significantly associated with the number of appointments scheduled and attended, and program status (graduation/completion and disengagement). Among Hispanic service users with spatial proximity further away from CSC (longer commutes) was associated with a lower likelihood of graduating/completing CSC compared to non-Hispanic service users (p = .04). Non-white services users had a higher risk of disengagement from CSC compared to white service users (p = .03); additionally, the effects of spatial proximity on disengagement were amplified for non-White service users (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that proximity is associated with program engagement and partially explains potential differences in program status among ethnoracial group.

Multidimensional Approach to Exploring Neighborhood Determinants and Symptom Severity Among Individuals With Psychosis.

Importance: The impact of cumulative exposure to neighborhood factors on psychosis, depression, and anxiety symptom severity prior to specialized services for psychosis is unknown. Objective: To identify latent neighborhood profiles based on unique combinations of social, economic, and environmental factors, and validate profiles by examining differences in symptom severity among individuals with first episode psychosis (FEP). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used neighborhood demographic data and health outcome data for US individuals with FEP receiving services between January 2017 and August 2022. Eligible participants were between ages 14 and 40 years and enrolled in a state-level coordinated specialty care network. A 2-step approach was used to characterize neighborhood profiles using census-tract data and link profiles to mental health outcomes. Data were analyzed March 2023 through October 2023. Exposures: Economic and social determinants of health; housing conditions; land use; urbanization; walkability; access to transportation, outdoor space, groceries, and health care; health outcomes; and environmental exposure. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences 15-item, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. Results: The total sample included 225 individuals aged 14 to 36 years (mean [SD] age, 20.7 [4.0] years; 152 men [69.1%]; 9 American Indian or Alaska Native [4.2%], 13 Asian or Pacific Islander [6.0%], 19 Black [8.9%], 118 White [55.1%]; 55 Hispanic ethnicity [26.2%]). Of the 3 distinct profiles identified, nearly half of participants (112 residents [49.8%]) lived in urban high-risk neighborhoods, 56 (24.9%) in urban low-risk neighborhoods, and 57 (25.3%) in rural neighborhoods. After controlling for individual characteristics, compared with individuals residing in rural neighborhoods, individuals residing in urban high-risk (mean estimate [SE], 0.17 [0.07]; P = .01) and urban low-risk neighborhoods (mean estimate [SE], 0.25 [0.12]; P = .04) presented with more severe psychotic symptoms. Individuals in urban high-risk neighborhoods reported more severe depression (mean estimate [SE], 1.97 [0.79]; P = .01) and anxiety (mean estimate [SE], 1.12 [0.53]; P = .04) than those in rural neighborhoods. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that in a cohort of individuals with FEP, baseline psychosis, depression, and anxiety symptom severity differed by distinct multidimensional neighborhood profiles that were associated with where individuals reside. Exploring the cumulative effect of neighborhood factors improves our understanding of social, economic, and environmental impacts on symptoms and psychosis risk which could potentially impact treatment outcomes.

Implementation support for the data-driven components of care in a multisite network of coordinated specialty care programs.

Beyond training providers prior to the roll-out of coordinated specialty care (CSC) for first-episode psychosis in clinical settings, implementation support for data-informed care remains an area that has received very little attention. The current paper describes the development and refinement of implementation support for the data-driven components of care in the New Journeys network, Washington State's CSC model for psychosis, comprised of 14 CSC programs. Using the Evidence-Based System for Innovation Support Logic Model, this paper outlines the individual components for implementation support, tools, training, technical assistance, and quality improvement/evaluation that have been developed for the New Journeys network. We present examples of modifications that have occurred over nine years to address the needs of clients, providers, and state-level network administrators to facilitate the data-driven components of care. We conclude with recommendations based on lessons learned in Washington State aimed at improving implementation of data-driven care in CSC models throughout the USA.

The purpose of this work was to outline the development and strategies used to provide implementation support for the data-driven components of coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis. We describe the individual use of tools, training, technical assistance, and quality improvement, and how these strategies are used collectively. Based on detailed notes from meetings and correspondence from providers and state-level administrators we present modifications that have occurred to address barriers and needs, essentially using quantitative and qualitative data to inform quality improvement. We then present lessons learned that could be helpful for existing and new coordinated specialty care networks.

Exploring service provider perspectives on service user engagement across service components in coordinated specialty care programs for psychosis.

Engagement in services is a core element to successful outcomes for service users and programs. In coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs, designed for individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis, engagement has only been measured programmatically and not by service component. This qualitative study sought to explore provider perspectives on service user engagement in service components of CSC. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 service providers from five community-based early intervention programs for psychosis in the United States. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was used to analyze the data collected. Provider participants described barriers and facilitators that contribute to disengagement or engagement in four service components within early intervention programs: individual psychotherapy, family education and support, medication management, and vocational services. Barriers identified included substance use, stigma, trauma, and external pressures. Identified barriers to engagement in CSC were both unique to individual components and cut across them. By better understanding the complexity of barriers and their intersections within and across CSC components, there can be more effective policy and program development to reduce disengagement and hopefully increase positive outcomes for service users. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Ethnoracial Differences in Family Members' Early Contact with Formal and Informal Resources on the Pathway to Care during the Early Stages of Psychosis.

The present study examined whether there were ethnoracial differences in the use of formal and informal resources by family members of individuals in the early stages of psychosis. A sample of 154 family member respondents participated in an online cross-sectional survey. Ethnoracially minoritized family members disproportionately made early contact with informal resources (e.g., religious/spiritual leaders, friends, online support groups) on the pathway to care compared to non-Hispanic white family members who tended to contact formal resources (primary care doctors/nurses or school counselors). A description of early contact among Black and Hispanic family members are also described. Study findings highlight that ethnoracially minoritized families seek out support and/or resources from informal resources embedded within their community. Our findings suggest the need for targeted strategies that leverage the reach of informal settings to capture family members as well as general community members.

Coming together for something good: recommendations from a scoping review for dissemination and implementation science to improve indigenous substance use disorder treatment.

Introduction: Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) science is growing among Indigenous communities. Indigenous communities are adapting and implementing evidence-based treatments for substance use disorders (SUD) to fit the needs of their communities. D&I science offers frameworks, models, and theories to increase implementation success, but research is needed to center Indigenous knowledge, enhancing D&I so that it is more applicable within Indigenous contexts. In this scoping review, we examined the current state of D&I science for SUD interventions among Indigenous communities and identified best-practice SUD implementation approaches. Methods: PubMed and PsycINFO databases were queried for articles written in English, published in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. We included key search terms for Indigenous populations and 35 content keywords. We categorized the data using the adapted and extended Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework that emphasizes equity and sustainability. RE-AIM has also been used as a primary model to consistently identify implementation outcomes. Results: Twenty articles were identified from the original unduplicated count of over 24,000. Over half the articles discussed processes related to Reach, Adoption, and Implementation. Effectiveness was discussed by 50% of the studies (n = 10), with 25% of the articles discussing Maintenance/sustainability (n = 4). Findings also highlighted the importance of the application of each RE-AIM domain for meaningful, well-defined community-engaged approaches. Conclusion: Finding indicated a need to prioritize Indigenous methods to culturally center, re-align and adapt Western treatments and frameworks to increase health equity and improve SUD treatment outcomes. Utility in the use of the modified RE-AIM and the continued modification for Indigenous communities was also noted.

An unexplored equity factor: differential beliefs and attitudes toward contingency management by providers' ethnicity.

BACKGROUND: Although considered one of the most effective interventions for substance use disorders (SUD), the widespread implementation of contingency management (CM) has remained limited. In more recent years there has been surge in the implementation of CM to address increasing rates of substance use. Prior studies at the provider-level have explored beliefs about CM among SUD treatment providers and have tailored implementation strategies based on identified barriers and training needs, to promote implementation of CM. However, there have been no implementation strategies that have actively sought to identify or address potential differences in the beliefs about CM that could be influenced by the cultural background (e.g., ethnicity) of treatment providers. To address this knowledge gap, we examined beliefs about CM among a sample of inpatient and outpatient SUD treatment providers. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of SUD treatment providers was completed by 143 respondents. The survey asked respondents about their attitudes toward CM using the Contingency Management Beliefs Questionnaire (CMBQ). Linear mixed models examined the effect of ethnicity (non-Hispanic White and Hispanic) on CMBQ subscale (general barriers, training-related barriers, CM positive-statements) scores. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent of respondents to the CMBQ self-identified as non-Hispanic White and 41% as Hispanic. Findings revealed that treatment providers who identified as Hispanic had significantly higher scores on the general barriers (p < .001) and training-related barriers (p = .020) subscales compared to the non-Hispanic White treatment providers. Post-hoc analyses identified differences in the endorsement of specific individual scale items on the general barriers (e.g., CM interventions create extra work for me) and training-related (e.g., I want more training before implementing CM) subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Dissemination and implementation strategies for CM need to consider equity-related factors at the provider-level that may be associated with the adoption and uptake of CM.

Study protocol for a multi-level cross-sectional study on the equitable reach and implementation of coordinated specialty care for early psychosis.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 115,000 young adults will experience their first episode of psychosis (FEP) each year in the USA. Coordinated specialty care (CSC) for early psychosis is an evidence-based early intervention model that has demonstrated effectiveness by improving quality of life and reducing psychiatric symptoms for many individuals. Over the last decade, there has significant increase in the implementation of CSC programs throughout the USA. However, prior research has revealed difficulties among individuals and their family members accessing CSC. Research has also shown that CSC programs often report the limited reach of their program to underserved populations and communities (e.g., ethnoracial minorities, rural and low socioeconomic neighborhoods). Dissemination and implementation research focused on the equitable reach and implementation of CSC is needed to address disparities at the individual level. METHODS: The proposed study will create a novel integrative multi-level geospatial database of CSC programs implemented throughout the USA that will include program-level data (e.g., geocoded location, capacity, setting, role availability), provider-level data (race, ethnicity, professional credentials), and neighborhood-level census data (e.g., residential segregation, ethnic density, area deprivation, rural-urban continua, public transit time). This database will be used to characterize variations in CSC programs by geographical location and examine the overall reach CSC programs to specific communities. The quantitative data will be combined with qualitative data from state administrators, providers, and service users that will inform the development of dissemination tools, such as an interactive dashboard, that can aid decision making. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study will highlight the impact of outer contextual determinants on implementation and reach of mental health services, and will serve to inform the future implementation of CSC programs with a primary focus on equity.

Reorienting the focus from an individual to a community-level lens to improve the pathways through care for early psychosis in the United States.

The implementation of coordinated specialty care in the U.S. over the past decade has led to the improvements of clinical and functional outcomes among individuals in the early stages of psychosis. While there have been advancements in the delivery of early intervention services for psychosis, it has almost exclusively focused on short-term change at the individual level. In light of these advancements, research has identified gaps in access to care and delivery of services that are driven by different levels of determinants and have the biggest impact on historically excluded groups (e.g., ethnoracial minoritized communities). Interventions or efforts that place an emphasis on community level (structural or sociocultural) factors and how they may influence pathways to care and through care, specifically for those who have been historically excluded, have largely been missing from the design, dissemination and implementation of early psychosis services. The present paper uses a structural violence framework to review current evidence related to pathways to care for early psychosis and the physical/built environment and conditions (e.g., urbanicity, residential instability) and formal and informal community resources. Suggestions on future directions are also provided, that focus on enriching communities and creating sustainable change that spans from pathways leading to care to 'recovery.' In all, this lays the groundwork for a proposed paradigm shift in research and practice that encompasses the need for an emphasis on structural competency and community-driven approaches.

Community-based family peer navigator programme to facilitate linkage to coordinated specialty care for early psychosis among Black families in the USA: A protocol for a hybrid type I feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 70% of Black/African American family members report no contact with mental health providers prior to initial diagnosis and the receipt of services for early psychosis. Black families often encounter barriers and experience delays on the pathway to coordinated specialty care programmes for early psychosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods study will (1) develop and refine a family peer navigator (FPN) for Black families designed to increase access and engagement in coordinated specialty care and (2) pilot-test FPN for Black families with 40 family members with loved ones at risk for psychosis in a randomised trial to assess the acceptability and feasibility. Families will be randomised to FPN (n=20) or a low-intensive care coordination (n=20). Other outcomes include proposed treatment targets (eg, knowledge, social connectedness), preliminary impact outcomes (time to coordinated specialty care programmes, initial family engagement), and implementation outcomes (acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from Washington State University Institutional Review Board and informed consent will be obtained from all participants. This study will establish an innovative culturally responsive FPN programme and implementation strategy, and generate preliminary data to support a larger hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. Study findings will be presented at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05284721.

An Unexplored Equity Factor During Pre-Implementation of Contingency Management: Differential Beliefs and Attitudes by Providers' Ethnicity.

Background Although considered one of the most effective interventions for substance use disorders (SUD), the widespread uptake of contingency management (CM) has remained limited. Prior studies at the provider-level have explored beliefs about CM among SUD treatment providers and have tailored implementation strategies based on identified barriers and training needs. However, there have been no implementation strategies that have actively sought to identify or address potential differences in the beliefs about CM that could be influenced by the cultural background (e.g., ethnicity) of treatment providers. To address this knowledge gap, we examined beliefs about CM among a sample of inpatient and outpatient SUD treatment providers. Methods A cross-sectional survey of SUD treatment providers was completed by 143 respondents. The survey asked respondents about their attitudes toward CM using the Contingency Management Beliefs Questionnaire (CMBQ). Linear mixed models were used to examine the effect of ethnicity on CMBQ subscale (general barriers, training-related barriers, CM positive-statements) scores. Results Fifty-nine percent of respondents self-identified as non-Hispanic White and 41% as Hispanic. Findings revealed that SUD providers who identified as Hispanic had significantly higher scores on the general barriers (p < .001) and training-related barriers (p = .020) subscales compared to the non-Hispanic White SUD providers. Post-hoc analyses identified differences in the endorsement of specific individual scale items on the general barriers and training-related subscales. Conclusions Dissemination and implementation strategies for CM among treatment providers need to consider equity-related factors at the provider-level that may be associated with the adoption and uptake CM.

Barriers to Meaningful Participatory Mental Health Services Research and Priority Next Steps: Findings From a National Survey.

OBJECTIVE: A growing consensus has emerged regarding the importance of stakeholder involvement in mental health services research. To identify barriers to and the extent of stakeholder involvement in participatory research, the authors undertook a mixed-methods study of researchers and community members who reported participation in such research. METHODS: Eight consultative focus groups were conducted with diverse groups of stakeholders in mental health services research (N=51 unique participants, mostly service users), followed by a survey of service users, family members, community providers, and researchers (N=98) with participatory research experience. Focus groups helped identify facilitators and barriers to meaningful research collaboration, which were operationalized in the national survey. Participants were also asked about high-priority next steps. RESULTS: The barrier most strongly endorsed as a large or very large problem in the field was lack of funding for stakeholder-led mental health services research (76%), followed by lack of researcher training in participatory methods (74%) and insufficiently diverse backgrounds among stakeholders (69%). The two most frequently identified high-priority next steps were ensuring training and continuing education for researchers and stakeholders (33%) and authentically centering lived experience and reducing tokenism in research (26%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a need for increased attention to and investment in the development, implementation, and sustainment of participatory methods that prioritize collaboration with direct stakeholders, particularly service users, in U.S. mental health services research. The findings also underscore the presence and potentially important role of researchers who dually identify as service users and actively contribute a broader orientation from the service user-survivor movement.

Recent substance use among clients with early psychosis and the potential to graduate from New Journeys.

AIM: This study examined the relationship between recent substance use prior to intake and program graduation among young adults with early psychosis enrolled in coordinated specialty care. METHODS: Participants (N = 248) were from New Journeys, a network of coordinated specialty care programs in Washington State. Recent (i.e., past 30 days) alcohol, cannabis, and other substance use was collected at intake and process data (e.g., contact) was collected by clinicians across a 2-year period. RESULTS: At intake, 32% of participants reported alcohol use only, 26% cannabis use only, and 15% both alcohol and cannabis use. Participants who reported alcohol use only (p = .02), cannabis use only (p = .03), and any substance use (p = .02) had significantly lower chances of graduating from coordinated specialty care than individuals who do not use substances. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike prior work, recent substance use influences clients' potential to graduate from New Journeys. Additional focus on the implementation of substance use treatment, with an emphasis on alcohol use, in coordinated specialty care programs is needed improve program completion rates.

A Multifaceted Technical Assistance Strategy to Facilitate Measurement Delivery in Coordinated Specialty Care.

In recent years, coordinated specialty care (CSC) providers have worked to harmonize and deliver data collection measures across programs so that they can provide data that enable measurement-informed care. However, the strategies that can effectively support the integration of a core assessment battery in clinical care remain unclear. This column presents an evaluation of a multifaceted technical assistance strategy for the delivery and completion of an assessment battery in nine CSC programs (N=247 clients). The findings suggest that a multifaceted technical assistance strategy can effectively support the integration of a comprehensive assessment battery in the care delivered by providers. Similar technical assistance strategies may assist CSC providers as they move toward providing data-driven care in an effort to improve quality of care.

The unique pathways to coordinate specialty care for Black families navigating early psychosis: A preliminary report.

BACKGROUND: Aversive pathways to coordinated specialty care (CSC) for first episode psychosis have been linked to the extended duration of untreated psychosis, limited engagement, and treatment outcomes. Yet there has been very limited research that has solely explored the unique pathways to care among Black families in the U.S. This study utilized qualitative methods to explore the pathways to CSC among Black individuals experiencing their first episode of psychosis and their family members. METHODS: Individuals who were or are enrolled in CSC programs and/or their family members were recruited to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Qualitative interviews were used to characterize events and experiences prior to the initiation of CSC. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. RESULTS: A total of 14 participants were recruited to complete semi-structured interviews. Findings revealed that during prodromal phase participants noticed changes in social functioning, identified prior childhood experiences that were viewed as traumatic, and sought very little help from formal sources. After the onset of psychosis, the majority of participants highlighted the importance of family members in the initiation of care, yet also expressed difficulties navigating services and engaging with clinical staff, contributing to further delays to the initiation of CSC. CONCLUSIONS: Finding from this study sheds light on understanding known disparities in utilization of services and potentially identifies areas that can be leveraged to improve the experiences for Black families seeking CSC.

Taking a Look at How Family Member Engagement Influences Service User Engagement in New Journeys: a Coordinated Specialty Care Program.

Family members are integral to the care and support of individuals experiencing early psychosis, and while studies have brought to light the impact of family engagement, there is a dearth in the literature on the ways family engagement in services affects service user engagement. The present study examined the relationship between initial family engagement and service user engagement among 349 service users enrolled in New Journeys, a network of coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs. Service users whose family members were initially engaged in treatment in the first month were more likely to remain engaged and attend appointments during the first 7 months relative to service users whose family members were not initially engaged (χ-2=88.4; p < 0.001). Overall, for a one unit increase in total number of appointments attended by family members in the first 24 months, the odds of service users' engagement increased by 14% (OR: 1.14, CI: 1.12-1.16). Findings demonstrate the association between family engagement and the engagement of service users in CSC.

Yakima County Incidence Rates of Sexually Transmitted Infections From 2013 to 2018 in Urban-Rural and Area-Deprivation Continua.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine variations in the incidence rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs; i.e., chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) across the urban-rural and area-deprivation continua from January of 2013 to December of 2018 in Yakima County, Washington. The rates of STIs has been increasing in the United States in the past decade. Historically, Yakima County has higher rates of STIs than state and national rates. In addition, Yakima County contains rural areas and areas with greater deprivation that face gaps in access to care. METHODS: The Washington State Department of Health Database Surveillance System was used to conduct the study. The data set included diagnosed cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis with positive laboratory test results for the duration of the study period. Incidence rates of STIs were calculated and statistically analyzed across the urban-rural and area-deprivation continua using rural-urban commuting area codes and the area deprivation index. RESULTS: The incidence rates of STIs increased from January of 2013 to December of 2018. Rates of STI did not differ in micropolitan, small town, and rural block groups compared with the metropolitan block groups. Most-deprived block groups had significantly higher STI rates compared with less deprived block groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for increased STI intervention in higher deprivation areas including STI education. Public health officials and health care providers should be aware of these risk factors and tailor interventions to the neighborhood they serve.

Variations in national availability of waivered buprenorphine prescribers by racial and ethnic composition of zip codes.

BACKGROUND: Opioid overdose remains a public health crisis in diverse communities. Between 2019 and 2020, there was an almost 40% increase in drug fatalities primarily due to opioid analogues of both stimulants and opioids. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD; e.g., buprenorphine) are effective, evidence-based treatments that can be delivered in office-based primary care settings. We investigated disparities in the proportion of national prescribers who have obtained a waiver issued to prescribe MOUD by demographic characteristics. METHODS: Data for the secondary data analyses were obtained from the Drug Enforcement Administration that maintains data on waivered MOUD prescribers across the US. Proportion of waivered prescribers were examined by ZIP code, race and ethnicity composition, socioeconomic status, insurance, and urban-rural designation using generalized linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: Compared with predominantly Non-Hispanic White ZIP codes, other racially and ethnically diverse areas had a higher proportion of waivered buprenorphine prescribers. Differences in prescriber availability between predominant racial group was dependent on rurality based on the interaction found in our fitted model. In metropolitan areas, we found that predominantly Non-Hispanic White ZIP codes had a lower rate of waivered prescribers compared to predominantly Black/African American ZIP codes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that among AI/AN and Black/African American neighborhoods, availability of waivered prescribers may not be a primary barrier. However, availability of waivered prescribers and prescribing might potentially be an obstacle for Hispanic/Latinx and rural communities. Additional research to determine factors related to improving MOUD availability among diverse communities therefore remains vital to advancing health equity.

Exploring Provider Perspectives on Implementing Coordinated Specialty Care: A Qualitative Study.

This study aimed to explore clinician roles and experiences related to the implementation and sustainability of coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs for first episode psychosis. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 CSC providers and team members, recruited from five CSC programs. Using a semi-structured guide, interviews explored experiences with the delivery of CSC in the context of community-based outpatient mental health agencies and the challenges with implementation. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes were parsed into two overarching categories, provider, and organizational-level factors, and further distilled into subthemes which interacted with one another to form an interacting web of barriers to successful programmatic implementation for CSC programs. Study findings have important implications for development of future policy for financing mental health agencies, the creation of additional materials, supports for the model, and hiring and retention of staff for future implemented CSC programs.