Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 15(4): 305-11, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21860999

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Microorganisms growing in a biofilm are associated with chronic and recurrent human infections and are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. There are various methods to detect biofilm production like Tissue Culture Plate (TCP), Tube method (TM), Congo Red Agar method (CRA), bioluminescent assay, piezoelectric sensors, and fluorescent microscopic examination. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare three methods for the detection of biofilms. METHOD: The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, National University of Sciences and Technology, Pakistan, from January 2010 to June 2010. A total of 110 clinical isolates were subjected to biofilm detection methods. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological procedures. Biofilm detection was tested by TCP, TM and CRA. Antibiotic susceptibility test of biofilm producing bacteria was performed by using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique according to CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: The TCP method was considered to be superior to TM and CRA. From the total of 110 clinical isolates, TCP method detected 22.7% as high, 41% moderate and 36.3% as weak or non-biofilm producers. We have observed higher antibiotic resistance in biofilm producing bacteria than non-biofilm producers. CONCLUSION: We can conclude from our study that the TCP method is a more quantitative and reliable method for the detection of biofilm forming microorganisms as compared to TM and CRA methods, and it can be recommended as a general screening method for detection of biofilm producing bacteria in laboratories.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Biofilms/growth & development , Gram-Negative Bacteria/physiology , Gram-Positive Bacteria/physiology , Bacterial Adhesion , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Humans
2.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 15(4): 305-311, July-Aug. 2011. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-595670

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Microorganisms growing in a biofilm are associated with chronic and recurrent human infections and are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. There are various methods to detect biofilm production like Tissue Culture Plate (TCP), Tube method (TM), Congo Red Agar method (CRA), bioluminescent assay, piezoelectric sensors, and fluorescent microscopic examination. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare three methods for the detection of biofilms. METHOD: The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, National University of Sciences and Technology, Pakistan, from January 2010 to June 2010. A total of 110 clinical isolates were subjected to biofilm detection methods. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological procedures. Biofilm detection was tested by TCP, TM and CRA. Antibiotic susceptibility test of biofilm producing bacteria was performed by using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique according to CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: The TCP method was considered to be superior to TM and CRA. From the total of 110 clinical isolates, TCP method detected 22.7 percent as high, 41 percent moderate and 36.3 percent as weak or non-biofilm producers. We have observed higher antibiotic resistance in biofilm producing bacteria than non-biofilm producers. CONCLUSION: We can conclude from our study that the TCP method is a more quantitative and reliable method for the detection of biofilm forming microorganisms as compared to TM and CRA methods, and it can be recommended as a general screening method for detection of biofilm producing bacteria in laboratories.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Biofilms/growth & development , Gram-Negative Bacteria/physiology , Gram-Positive Bacteria/physiology , Bacterial Adhesion , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects
3.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 61(4): 356-9, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21465972

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the in vitro activities of vancomycin and linezolid against methicillin resistant Staphyloccus aureus in our set up to help in formulating a better empirical treatment and reduce the emergence of vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: The study was conducted over a period of 6 months (1st July 2009-31st Dec 2009). Fifty Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the clinical isolates of Military Hospital Rawalpindi were subjected to the determination of Minimum inhibitory concentrations of linezolid and vancomycin using E-strips. RESULTS: All the isolated organisms were uniformly susceptible to both the antibiotics. Vancomycin showed higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) as compared to linezolid MICs. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that linezolid and vancomycin have similar in vitro efficacy for methicillin resistant Staphyloccus aureus infections.


Subject(s)
Acetamides/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Oxazolidinones/pharmacology , Vancomycin/pharmacology , Hospitals, Military , Humans , Linezolid , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...