ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: For nursing home residents with severe dementia, high-intensity medical treatment offers little possibility of benefit but has the potential to cause significant distress. Nevertheless, mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) transfers have increased in this population. We sought to understand how and why such care is occurring. DESIGN: Mixed methods study, with retrospective collection of qualitative and quantitative data. SETTING: Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals. METHODS: Using the Minimum Data Set, we identified veterans aged ≥65 years who had severe dementia, lived in nursing homes, and died in 2013. We selected those who underwent mechanical ventilation or ICU transfer in the last 30 days of life. We restricted our sample to patients receiving care at VA hospitals because these hospitals share an electronic medical record, from which we collected structured information and constructed detailed narratives of how medical decisions were made. We used qualitative content analysis to identify distinct paths to high-intensity treatment in these narratives. RESULTS: Among 163 veterans, 41 (25.2%) underwent mechanical ventilation or ICU transfer. Their median age was 85 (IQR, 80-94), 97.6% were male, and 67.5% were non-Hispanic white. More than a quarter had living wills declining some or all treatment. There were 5 paths to high-intensity care. The most common (18 of 41 patients) involved families who struggled with decisions. Other patients (15 of 41) received high-intensity care reflexively, before discussion with a surrogate. Four patients had families who advocated repeatedly for aggressive treatment, against clinical recommendations. In 2 cases, information about the patient's preferences was erroneous or unavailable. In 2 cases, there was difficulty identifying a surrogate. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings highlight the role of surrogates' difficulty with decision making and of health system-level factors in end-of-life ICU transfers and mechanical ventilation among nursing home residents with severe dementia.
Subject(s)
Dementia , Nursing Homes , Respiration, Artificial , Terminal Care , Humans , Male , Aged, 80 and over , Dementia/therapy , Female , Retrospective Studies , Aged , United States , Patient Transfer , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Effective education and support for adults with dementia and their caregivers around pandemic issues is critical for protecting them. Animation-based learning has shown promise in patient education. We collaborated with educators and support staff at Alzheimer's Association Connecticut (AACT) to conduct a mixed-methods study and develop an animated e-curriculum addressing pandemic related challenges. METHODS: We conducted focus groups and surveys with dementia and caregiver educators and support staff at AACT for the initial needs assessment and the later e-curriculum evaluation. An interdisciplinary team of educators followed a step-wise process to transform the needs assessment results into an animation based e-curriculum. RESULTS: Participants identified the following pandemic challenges: 1) social isolation, 2) caregiver fatigue, 3) safety, and 4) difficulty navigating the healthcare system. The overall quality and usefulness of the e-curriculum was "very good" or "excellent". CONCLUSIONS: An animated e-curriculum addressing pandemic related issues relevant to adults with dementia and caregivers had positive reviews and was associated with improvement in self-reported ability to perform curriculum objectives among community dementia educators. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The pandemic challenges identified may facilitate the development of further resources. Additionally, this project may serve as a guide for clinicians interested in incorporating animation into education efforts.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dementia , Adult , Humans , Caregivers/education , Dementia/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Curriculum , Needs AssessmentABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate compliance with and safety of a novel independent home exercise program for patients with high-grade brain tumors. We designed this program around the preferences and individual capabilities of this population as well as the potential barriers to exercise in cancer patients. Demographics were collected to better understand those that persisted with exercise. METHODS: Subjects with high-grade brain tumor received one-time training that included watching an exercise video and live demonstration of resistance band exercises, a balance exercise, and recommendations for walking. Subjects were instructed to do the exercises every day for 1 month. Main outcome measures were percentage of subjects who exercised throughout the month, frequency of exercising, demographic factors, quality of life scores (assessed by FACT-BR), and self report of adverse events. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 15 (93%) subjects started the exercises during the course of the month. Nine of the fifteen (60%) continued the exercises throughout the month. Three additional subjects would have continued to exercise if formal or supervised rehabilitation had been offered. Among the subjects who continued the exercises regularly, higher frequency of exercising was significantly associated with living as married (p = 0.033), annual income >$50,000 (p = 0.047), scores of physical well-being (p = 0.047), and brain cancer specific well-being (p = 0.054) subscales. Among those who exercised frequently, there was also a trend towards increase in total FACT-BR scores (p = 0.059). The subjects who scored higher on the social well-being subscale of the FACT-BR at baseline self-reported a higher likelihood to continue the exercises after 1 month of participation in the study (p = 0.018). No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Our small group of subjects with high-grade brain tumors demonstrated compliance with and safety of a novel independent strength and balance exercise program in the home setting. Higher frequency of exercising was associated with life quality parameters as well as marriage and income.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Quality of Life/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Patient Compliance , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have the potential to improve personalized medicine in breast cancer care. As new SNPs are discovered, further enhancing risk classification, SNP testing may serve to complement family history and phenotypic risk factors when assessed in a clinical setting. SNP analysis is particularly relevant to high-risk women who may seek out such information to guide their decision-making around risk-reduction. However, little is known about how high-risk women may respond to SNP testing with regard to clinical decision-making. We examined high-risk women's interest in SNP testing for breast cancer risk through an online survey of hypothetical testing scenarios. Women stated their preferences for sharing test results and selected the most likely follow-up action they would pursue in each of the test result scenarios (above average and below average risk for breast cancer). Four hundred seventy-eight women participated. Most women (89 %) did not know what a SNP was prior to the study. Once SNP testing was described, 75 % were interested in SNP testing. Participants stated an interest in lifestyle interventions for risk-reduction and wanted to discuss their testing results with their doctor or a genetic counselor. Women are interested in SNP testing and are prepared to make lifestyle changes based on testing results. Women's preference for discussing testing results with a healthcare provider aligns with the current trend towards SNP testing in a clinical setting.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Testing/methods , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Precision Medicine/methods , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Decision Making , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Humans , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making has become an integral part of medical consultation. Research has, however, reported wide differences in individuals' desires to be involved in the decision-making process, and these differences in preferences are likely to be the result of a number of factors including age, education and numeracy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether patients at genetic risk for cancer had preferences for shared decision making that differed depending on medical domain (general health vs. cancer) and whether decision preferences are linked to numeracy abilities. METHODS: Four hundred and seventy-six women who consented to participate in response to an email sent by a local branch of the U.S.-based Cancer Genetics Network (CGN) to its members. Participants completed the Control Preference Scale, as well as an objective and subjective numeracy scales. RESULTS: Decision domain (cancer vs. general health) was not associated with women's preferences for involvement in decision making. Objective and subjective numeracy predicted a preference for decision involvement in general, and only objective numeracy was predictive with regard to cancer. CONCLUSION: Participants were equally likely to state they wanted to play an active, collaborative or passive role in both medical domains (general and cancer). High-numeracy participants were more likely to express a desire for an active role in general and in case they were diagnosed with cancer. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health authorities' recommendations to clinicians to include patients in their medical decisions are supported by patients' desires, and clinicians should be cognizant of their patients' preferences as well as their numeracy skills.
Subject(s)
Decision Making , Neoplasms/psychology , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/psychology , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms/genetics , Patient Preference , Risk Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of a treatment strategy for symptomatic uterine fibroids that uses MRI-guided focused ultrasound as a first-line therapy relative to uterine artery embolization (UAE) or hysterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We developed a decision-analytic model to compare the cost effectiveness of three first-line treatment strategies: MRI-guided focused ultrasound, UAE, and hysterectomy. Treatment-specific short- and long-term utilities, lifetime costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were incorporated, allowing us to conduct an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, using a societal willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY to designate a strategy as cost effective. Sensitivity analyses were subsequently performed on all key parameters. RESULTS. In the base-case analysis, UAE as a first-line treatment of symptomatic fibroids was the most effective and expensive strategy (22.75 QALYs; $22,968), followed by MRI-guided focused ultrasound (22.73 QALYs; $20,252) and hysterectomy (22.54 QALYs; $11,253). MRI-guided focused ultrasound was cost effective relative to hysterectomy, with an associated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $47,891/QALY. The ICER of UAE relative to MRI-guided focused ultrasound was $234,565/QALY, exceeding the WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY, therefore rendering MRI-guided focused ultrasound also cost effective relative to UAE. In sensitivity analyses, results were robust to changes in most parameters but were sensitive to changes in probabilities of recurrence, symptom relief, and quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSION. First-line treatment of eligible women with MRI-guided focused ultra-sound is a cost-effective noninvasive strategy. For those not eligible for MRI-guided focused ultra-sound, UAE remains a cost-effective option. These recommendations integrate both the short- and long-term decrements in quality of life associated with the specific treatment modalities.
Subject(s)
Leiomyoma/therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/economics , Ultrasonic Therapy/economics , Uterine Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Efficiency, Organizational , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/economics , Leiomyoma/economics , Models, Economic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Uterine Neoplasms/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer risk reduction has the potential to decrease the incidence of the disease, yet remains underused. We report on the development a web-based tool that provides automated risk assessment and personalized decision support designed for collaborative use between patients and clinicians. METHODS: Under Institutional Review Board approval, we evaluated the decision tool through a patient focus group, usability testing, and provider interviews (including breast specialists, primary care physicians, genetic counselors). This included demonstrations and data collection at two scientific conferences (2009 International Shared Decision Making Conference, 2009 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium). RESULTS: Overall, the evaluations were favorable. The patient focus group evaluations and usability testing (N = 34) provided qualitative feedback about format and design; 88% of these participants found the tool useful and 94% found it easy to use. 91% of the providers (N = 23) indicated that they would use the tool in their clinical setting. CONCLUSION: BreastHealthDecisions.org represents a new approach to breast cancer prevention care and a framework for high quality preventive healthcare. The ability to integrate risk assessment and decision support in real time will allow for informed, value-driven, and patient-centered breast cancer prevention decisions. The tool is being further evaluated in the clinical setting.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Decision Making , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/standards , Decision Support Techniques , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/instrumentation , Disease Management , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Internet/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Risk Assessment , Risk Reduction BehaviorABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Better criteria are needed to identify patients who should be screened for Barrett's esophagus (BE) to reduce overtesting and improve the cost effectiveness. There is evidence that chemopreventive agents such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, particularly aspirin, reduce the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), but little is known about their effects on BE. We analyzed characteristics of patients with BE for factors that might be used in screening and management. METHODS: In this case-controlled study, we identified 434 patients with BE diagnosed at the first endoscopy (incident cases) at a single institution (1997-2010). BE cases were matched with controls on the basis of indication for endoscopy, year of endoscopy, and endoscopist. Risk factors analyzed included age, sex, body mass index, medical and social history, and medications. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify clinical risk factors for BE. RESULTS: In a multivariate regression model, men had a greater risk for developing BE (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.4), whereas current aspirin users had a lower risk than nonusers (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.80). A subset analysis, limited to patients who had endoscopies for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, yielded similar findings. No interactions were found between aspirin use and smoking or use of acid-suppressive medications. CONCLUSIONS: In a case-controlled study of 434 patients with BE, current aspirin use appeared to reduce the risk of BE; previous studies associated aspirin use with a reduced risk of EAC. Although efforts were made to minimize biases in our analysis, the possibility of residual confounding remains.
Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Barrett Esophagus/prevention & control , Aged , Barrett Esophagus/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Chemoprevention/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , PrevalenceABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of incorporating radiation risk into microsimulation (first-order Monte Carlo) models for breast and lung cancer screening to illustrate effects of including radiation risk on patient outcome projections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All data used in this study were derived from publicly available or deidentified human subject data. Institutional review board approval was not required. The challenges of incorporating radiation risk into simulation models are illustrated with two cancer screening models (Breast Cancer Model and Lung Cancer Policy Model) adapted to include radiation exposure effects from mammography and chest computed tomography (CT), respectively. The primary outcome projected by the breast model was life expectancy (LE) for BRCA1 mutation carriers. Digital mammographic screening beginning at ages 25, 30, 35, and 40 years was evaluated in the context of screenings with false-positive results and radiation exposure effects. The primary outcome of the lung model was lung cancer-specific mortality reduction due to annual screening, comparing two diagnostic CT protocols for lung nodule evaluation. The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm was used to estimate the mean values of the results with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs). RESULTS: Without radiation exposure effects, the breast model indicated that annual digital mammography starting at age 25 years maximized LE (72.03 years; 95% UI: 72.01 years, 72.05 years) and had the highest number of screenings with false-positive results (2.0 per woman). When radiation effects were included, annual digital mammography beginning at age 30 years maximized LE (71.90 years; 95% UI: 71.87 years, 71.94 years) with a lower number of screenings with false-positive results (1.4 per woman). For annual chest CT screening of 50-year-old females with no follow-up for nodules smaller than 4 mm in diameter, the lung model predicted lung cancer-specific mortality reduction of 21.50% (95% UI: 20.90%, 22.10%) without radiation risk and 17.75% (95% UI: 16.97%, 18.41%) with radiation risk. CONCLUSION: Because including radiation exposure risk can influence long-term projections from simulation models, it is important to include these risks when conducting modeling-based assessments of diagnostic imaging.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Thoracic , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Algorithms , Early Detection of Cancer , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Monte Carlo Method , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The United States has experienced an alarming and unexplained increase in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) since the 1970s. A concurrent increase in obesity has led some to suggest a relationship between the two trends. We explore the extent of this relationship. METHODS: Using a previously validated disease simulation model of white males in the United States, we estimated EAC incidence 1973 to 2005 given constant obesity prevalence and low population progression rates consistent with the early 1970s. Introducing only the observed, rising obesity prevalence, we calculated the incremental incidence caused by obesity. We compared these with EAC incidence data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to determine obesity's contribution to the rise therein. Incidences were converted to absolute numbers of cases using U.S. population data. RESULTS: Using constant obesity prevalence, we projected a total of 30,555 EAC cases cumulatively over 1973 to 2005 and 1,151 in 2005 alone. Incorporating the observed obesity trend resulted in 35,767 cumulative EACs and 1,608 in 2005. Estimates derived from SEER data showed 111,223 cumulative and 7,173 cases in 2005. We conclude that the rise in obesity accounted for 6.5% of the increase in EAC cases that occurred from 1973 to 2005 and 7.6% in the year 2005. CONCLUSION: Using published OR for EAC among obese individuals, we found that only a small percentage of the rise in EAC incidence is attributable to secular trends in obesity. IMPACT: Other factors, alone and in combination, should be explored as causes of the EAC epidemic.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/ethnology , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Computer Simulation , Esophageal Neoplasms/ethnology , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Models, Statistical , Obesity/complications , Obesity/ethnology , Registries , Risk Factors , SEER Program , United States/epidemiology , White PeopleABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Growth hormone excess and growth hormone deficiency (GHD) are both associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity. A specific acromegaly-related cardiomyopathy has been described, characterized in part by increased left ventricular mass (LVM). Growth hormone deficiency is associated with reduced LVM. Following cure of acromegaly with surgery or radiation therapy, GHD may develop; however, its effects on cardiac morphology and function in this population are not established. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the development of GHD in patients with prior acromegaly would be associated with cardiac morphologic and functional changes that differ from those in patients who are GH sufficient following cure of acromegaly. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a Clinical Research Center. Study participants consisted of three groups of subjects (n=34): I. Cured acromegaly with GHD (n=15), II. Cured acromegaly with GH sufficiency (n=8), and III. Active acromegaly (n=11). Main outcome measures included cardiac morphology and function, using echocardiography parameters. RESULTS: Mean age and BMI, 44.6 ± 2.3 years (SEM) and 30.7 ± 1.3 kg/m², respectively, were not different among the three groups. Mean peak GH values were: I. 2.8 ± 0.4 ng/ml; II. 30.1 ± 9.1 ng/ml (p=0.0002.) In group I, left ventricular mass, indexed to body surface area (LVMi), was within the normal range in all patients; moreover, left ventricular (LV) geometry was normal. At least 50% of patients in groups II and III had elevated LVMi, and in 50% of patients, LV geometry was abnormal, indicating pathologic hypertrophy. Ejection fraction was similar between all three groups. There were no significant differences in diastolic function. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who develop GHD following cure of acromegaly do not demonstrate elevated LV mass, in contrast to patients with a history of acromegaly but normal GH levels or to patients with active acromegaly. This suggests that GH status after treatment of acromegaly correlates with LV mass, and that, in GH sufficient patients, reversal of remodeling may be slower than previously thought. These data suggest that it will be important to determine whether GH replacement alters left ventricular morphology over time.
Subject(s)
Acromegaly/pathology , Heart Ventricles/pathology , Human Growth Hormone/blood , Human Growth Hormone/deficiency , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/pathology , Acromegaly/blood , Acromegaly/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Echocardiography , Female , Human Growth Hormone/metabolism , Humans , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/blood , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/therapy , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Size , Stroke Volume/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Both GH deficiency (GHD) and GH excess are associated with a decreased quality of life. However, it is unknown whether patients with GHD after treatment for acromegaly have a poorer quality of life than those with normal GH levels after cure of acromegaly. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether patients with GHD and prior acromegaly have a poorer quality of life than those with GH sufficiency after cure of acromegaly. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a General Clinical Research Center. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five patients with prior acromegaly participated: 26 with GHD and 19 with GH sufficiency. INTERVENTION: There were no interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated quality of life, as measured by 1) the Quality of Life Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency Assessment (QoL-AGHDA); 2) the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36); and 3) the Symptom Questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean scores on all subscales of all questionnaires, except for the anger/hostility and anxiety subscales of the Symptom Questionnaire, showed significantly impaired quality of life in the GH-deficient group compared with the GH-sufficient group. Peak GH levels after GHRH-arginine stimulation levels were inversely associated with QoL-AGHDA scale scores (R = -0.53; P = 0.0005) and the Symptom Questionnaire Depression subscale scores (R = -0.35; P = 0.031) and positively associated with most SF-36 subscale scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our data are the first to demonstrate a reduced quality of life in patients who develop GHD after cure of acromegaly compared to those who are GH sufficient. Further studies are warranted to determine whether GH replacement would improve quality of life for patients with GHD after cure from acromegaly.