Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Heliyon ; 7(2): e06188, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33659735

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown increased pain scores to painful stimulation after experimental sleep restriction, but reduced or unchanged magnitude of the event related potentials (ERPs) when averaged in the time-domain. However, some studies found increased response magnitude when averaging in the time-frequency domain. The aim of this study was to determine whether ERP-latency jitter may contribute to this discrepancy. METHODS: Ninety painful electrical stimuli were given to 21 volunteers after two nights of 50% sleep restriction and after two nights of habitual sleep. ERPs were analyzed in the time-domain (N2-and P2-peaks) and time-frequency domain (power spectral density). We quantified latency jitter by the mean consecutive difference (MCD) between single-trial peak latencies and by phase locking value (PLV) across trials. RESULTS: P2-MCD increased from 20.4 ± 2.1 ms after habitual sleep to 24.3 ± 2.2 ms after sleep restriction (19%, p = 0.038) and PLV decreased from 0.582 ± 0.015 after habitual sleep to 0.536 ± 0.015 after sleep restriction (7.9%, p = 0.009). We found no difference for N2-MCD. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that partial sleep restriction increase latency jitter in cortical responses to experimental pain. SIGNIFICANCE: Latency jitter may contribute to the discrepancies between ERP-responses in the time-frequency domain and time-domain. Latency jitter should be considered when ERPs are analyzed.

2.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 128(12): 2411-2418, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29096214

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate motor cortical excitability, inhibition, and facilitation with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in migraine in a blinded cross-sectional study. METHODS: Resting motor threshold (RMT), cortical silent period (CSP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were compared in 27 interictal migraineurs and 33 controls. 24 female interictal migraineurs and 27 female controls were compared in subgroup analyses. Seven preictal migraineurs were also compared to the interictal group in a hypothesis-generating analysis. Investigators were blinded for diagnosis during recording and analysis of data. RESULTS: SICI was decreased in interictal migraineurs when compared to healthy controls (p=0.013), CSP was shortened in female interictal migraineurs (p=0.041). ICF was decreased in preictal compared to interictal migraineurs (p=0.023). RMT and ICF were not different between interictal migraineurs and controls. CONCLUSION: Cortical inhibition was decreased in migraineurs between attacks, primarily in a female subgroup, indicating an importance of altered cortical inhibition in migraine. SIGNIFICANCE: Previous studies on motor cortical excitability in migraineurs have yielded varying results. This relatively large and blinded study provides support for altered cortical inhibition in migraine. Measuring intracortical facilitation in the period preceding migraine attacks may be of interest for future studies.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Random Allocation , Single-Blind Method
3.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 127(6): 2362-9, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27178854

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) is involved in the migraine pathogenesis, by exploring the effect of navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to S2 on thermal perception and pain. METHODS: In this blinded sham-controlled case-control study of 26 interictal migraineurs and 31 controls, we measured thermal detection and pain thresholds on the hand and forehead, and pain ratings to heat stimulation on the forearm and temple, after real and sham 10Hz rTMS. RESULTS: rTMS increased cold and heat pain thresholds in controls as compared to interictal migraineurs (p<0.026). rTMS decreased forehead and arm pain ratings (p<0.005) and increased hand cool detection thresholds (p<0.005) in both interictal migraineurs and controls. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of rTMS to S2 on thermal pain measures differed significantly between migraine and control subjects, although the effects were generally low in magnitude and not present in pain ratings. However, the lack of cold and heat pain threshold increase in migraineurs may reflect a hypofunction of inhibitory pain modulation mechanisms. SIGNIFICANCE: The expected rTMS-induced cold and heat hypoalgesia was not found among migraineurs, possibly a reflection of reduced intracortical inhibition.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/therapy , Pain Management , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Pain Perception , Somatosensory Cortex/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...