Comparing two different orthogeriatric models of care for hip fracture patients: an observational prospective cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with hip fractures are almost always operated with quite extensive surgery and are often frail with a high risk of complications, increased dependency, and death. Orthogeriatric interdisciplinary care has shown better results compared with orthopaedic care alone. The best way of delivering orthogeriatric care, however, is still largely unknown. It is believed that a high degree of integration and shared care is better than on-demand consultative services. We aimed to evaluate two different orthogeriatric models for patients with hip fracture. METHODS: A prospective hip fracture quality database was used to evaluate two coexisting models of care from 2019 to 2021 in our hospital. An 'integrated care model' (ICM) was compared with a 'geriatric consult service' (GCS). RESULTS: 516 patients were available for analysis, 360 from ICM and 156 from GCS. Mean age was 84 years. There were 370 (72%) women. American Society of Anesthesiologists class and prefracture cognitive impairment was similar between the groups. There were more patients with femoral neck fractures in the ICM group, and more patients were living independently prefracture. A logistic regression adjusting for the variables above showed that more patients in the ICM group were given a nerve block preoperatively (OR 2.0 (95% CI 1.31 to 2.97); p<0.01), had their urinary catheter removed the first day after surgery (OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.89); p<0.01), were mobilised to standing or seated in a chair beside the bed the first day after surgery (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.30); p=0.033) and more ICM patients were considered for treatment against osteoporosis (OR 8.58 (95% CI 4.03 to 18.28); p<0.001). There were no significant differences in time to surgery, length of stay, discharge destination or mortality. CONCLUSION: The ICM group performed equally good or better on all quality indicators than the GCS.

Post-discharge complications in frail older patients after surgery for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of postoperative complications after colorectal cancer surgery varies between publications. Complications occurring after discharge from hospital are often not reported. The aims of this study were to investigate the proportion of frail older colorectal cancer patients who developed complications only after discharge, the severity of post-discharge complications, and the time point at which the most frequent complications occurred. METHODS: Patients were included if they were 65 years and older, screened positively for frailty and were scheduled for colorectal cancer surgery. Included patients were followed prospectively both in hospital and after discharge for 30 days after surgery, and complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: We included 114 patients. Median age was 79 years. Twenty-two patients (19%) were discharged without complications, but developed complications after discharge. These patients had shorter length of stay (6.5 versus 10 days), were more often discharged to their own home without assistance, and had higher 5-year survival (76% vs 54%) than patients who developed complications in hospital. Post-discharge complications were most frequently grade II. The most common types of complications that occurred late in the postoperative course were urinary tract infections and superficial surgical site infections. CONCLUSIONS: Complications after colorectal cancer surgery in frail older patients frequently arise after discharge from hospital. Doctors should be aware of this and inform their patients. This is increasingly important as length of stay after surgery decreases. When complications are used as a quality measure, it should be clear whether only in-hospital complications are registered.

Peri-Operative Management of Older Adults with Cancer-The Roles of the Surgeon and Geriatrician.

Optimal surgical management of older adults with cancer starts pre-operatively. The surgeon plays a key role in the appropriate selection of patients and procedures, optimisation of their functional status prior to surgery, and provision of more intensive care for those who are at high risk of post-operative complications. The literature, mainly based on retrospective, non-randomised studies, suggests that factors such as age, co-morbidities, pre-operative cognitive function and intensity of the surgical procedure all appear to contribute to the development of post-operative complications. Several studies have shown that a pre-operative geriatric assessment predicts post-operative mortality and morbidity as well as survival in older surgical cancer patients. Geriatricians are used to working in multidisciplinary teams that assess older patients and make individual treatment plans. However, the role of the geriatrician in the surgical oncology setting is not well established. A geriatrician could be a valuable contribution to the treatment team both in the pre-operative stage (patient assessment and pre-operative optimisation) and the post-operative stage (patient assessment and treatment of medical complications as well as discharge planning).

Frailty is an independent predictor of survival in older patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is prevalent in the older population. Geriatric assessment (GA) has previously been found to predict treatment tolerance and postoperative complications in older cancer patients. The aim of this study was to explore whether GA also predicts 1-year and 5-year survival after CRC surgery in older patients and to compare the predictive power of GA with that of established prognostic factors such as TNM classification of malignant tumors (TNM) stage and age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 178 CRC patients aged 70 and older were followed prospectively. All patients went through elective surgery, and GA was performed presurgery. The GA resulted in patients being divided into two groups: frail or nonfrail. All patients were followed for 5 years or until death. Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plots and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (43%) were frail, and one hundred and two (57%) were nonfrail. Twenty-three patients (13%) died during the first year after surgery. One-year survival was 80% in the frail group and 92% in the nonfrail group. Five-year survival was significantly lower in frail (24%) than nonfrail patients (66%), and this difference was apparent both within the stratums of TNM stages 0-II and TNM stage III. In multivariable analysis adjusting for TNM stage, age, and sex, frailty was an independent prognostic factor for survival. CONCLUSION: A GA-based frailty assessment predicts 1-year and 5-year survival in older patients after surgery for CRC. In localized and regional disease, the impact of frailty upon 5-year survival is comparable with that of TNM stage.

Validity of the quantitative EEG statistical pattern recognition method in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease.

AIMS: To evaluate the use of quantitative EEG (qEEG) statistical pattern recognition in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: qEEG was performed on 104 patients referred to a memory clinic. The qEEG results were compared to the clinical diagnosis made without access to the EEG results. RESULTS: Of 30 patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD, 22 were test positive. Of the 74 patients without AD, 34 were test negative. The qEEG result was found to correlate with atrophy of the medial temporal lobe demonstrated on cerebral MRI (p = 0.002) and with scores on neuropsychological tests. CONCLUSION: The qEEG was poor at diagnosing AD, as it produced many false-positive results.