Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Bone Joint Surg Br ; 92(1): 51-5, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20044678

ABSTRACT

We prospectively randomised 78 patients into two groups, 'drains' or 'no drains' to assess the effectiveness of suction drains in reducing haematoma and effusion in the joint and its effect on wound healing after total knee replacement. Ultrasound was used to measure the formation of haematoma and effusion on the fourth post-operative day. This was a semi-quantitative assessment of volume estimation. There was no difference in the mean effusion between the groups (5.91 mm in the drain group versus 6.08 mm in the no-drain, p = 0.82). The mean amount of haematoma in the no-drain group was greater (11.07 mm versus 8.41 mm, p = 0.03). However, this was not clinically significant judged by the lack of difference in the mean reduction in the post-operative haemoglobin between the groups (drain group 3.4 g/dl; no-drain group 3.0 g/dl, p = 0.38). There were no cases of wound infection or problems with wound healing at six weeks in any patient. Our findings indicate that drains do not reduce joint effusion but do reduce haematoma formation. They have no effect on wound healing.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Drainage , Exudates and Transudates/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drainage/instrumentation , Female , Hematoma/therapy , Humans , Knee Joint/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Ultrasonography , Wound Healing/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...