Pharmacokinetic interactions between ritonavir and quinine in healthy volunteers following concurrent administration.

AIMS: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions between ritonavir and quinine in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were each given 600-mg single oral doses of quinine alone, ritonavir alone (200 mg every 12 h for 9 days), and quinine in combination with ritonavir, in a three-period pharmacokinetic nonrandomized sequential design study. Quinine was co-administered with the 15th dose of ritonavir. Blood samples collected at predetermined time intervals were analysed for ritonavir, quinine and its major metabolite, 3-hydroxyquinine, using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. RESULTS: Concurrent ritonavir administration resulted in about fourfold increases in both the C(max) and AUC(T)[C(max) 2.79 +/- 0.22 vs. 10.72 +/- 0.32 mg l(-1), 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.81, 8.04; AUC 50.06 +/- 2.52 vs. 220.47 +/- 6.68 mg h(-1) l(-1), 95% CI 166.3, 175.3], a significant increase (P < 0.01) in the elimination half-life (11.15 +/- 0.80 vs. 13.37 +/- 0.33 h, 95% CI 1.64, 2.77) and about a 4.5-fold decrease in CL/F (12.01 +/- 0.61 vs. 2.71 +/- 0.09 l h(-1)) of quinine. Also, with ritonavir, there was a pronounced reduction of AUC(metabolite)/AUC(unchanged drug) ratio of quinine (1.35 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.02) along with a marked decrease in C(max) (1.80 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.96 +/- 0.09 mg l(-1)) and AUC(0-48h) (62.80 +/- 6.30 vs. 25.61 +/- 2.44 mg h(-1) l(-1)) of the metabolite. Similarly, quinine caused modest but significant increases (P < 0.01) in the C(max), AUC and elimination T((1/2)) of ritonavir. CONCLUSIONS: Downward dosage adjustment of quinine appears necessary when concurrently administered with ritonavir.

Effects of concurrent administration of nevirapine on the disposition of quinine in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Nevirapine and quinine are likely to be administered concurrently in the treatment of patients with HIV and malaria. Both drugs are metabolised to a significant extent by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and nevirapine is also an inducer of this enzyme. This study therefore evaluated the effect of nevirapine on the pharmacokinetics of quinine. METHODS: Quinine (600 mg single dose) was administered either alone or with the 17th dose of nevirapine (200 mg every 12 h for 12 days) to 14 healthy volunteers in a crossover fashion. Blood samples collected at predetermined time intervals were analysed for quinine and its major metabolite, 3-hydroxquinine, using a validated HPLC method. KEY FINDINGS: Administration of quinine plus nevirapine resulted in significant decreases (P < 0.01) in the total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(T)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and terminal elimination half-life (T((1/2)beta)) of quinine compared with values with quinine dosing alone (AUC: 53.29 +/- 4.01 vs 35.48 +/- 2.01 h mg/l; C(max): 2.83 +/- 0.16 vs 1.81 +/- 0.06 mg/l; T((1/2)beta): 11.35 +/- 0.72 vs 8.54 +/- 0.76 h), while the oral plasma clearance markedly increased (11.32 +/- 0.84 vs 16.97 +/- 0.98 l/h). In the presence of nevirapine there was a pronounced increase in the ratio of AUC(metabolite)/AUC (unchanged drug) and highly significant increases in C(max) and AUC of the metabolite (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Nevirapine significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of quinine. An increase in the dose of quinine may be necessary when the drug is co-administered with nevirapine.

Simultaneous liquid chromatographic analysis of ritonavir, quinine and 3-hydroxyquinine in human plasma.

In regions with high prevalence of HIV and malaria, co-infection of both diseases is common; hence, there is a high possibility of concurrent administration of antiretroviral and antimalarial drugs. This study describes a new ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for simultaneous determinations of ritonavir (RTV), quinine (QN), and its major metabolite, 3-hydroxyquinine (3-HQN), in human plasma. Following a simple extraction with diethyl-ether under alkaline conditions, chromatographic separation was achieved on a 5-mum particle size C-18 column (200 mm x 4.6mm I.D.) using a mobile phase consisting of methanol:acetonitrile:0.02 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate (15:10:75) containing 75 mmol/L perchloric acid (pH 2.8). Retention times for RTV, 3-HQN, QN and the internal standard were 2.8, 4.0, 7.0 and 12 min, respectively. The limits of detection and validated lower limits of quantitation were 10 and 12.5 ng/ml for RTV while the corresponding values were 5 and 70 ng/ml for both QN and 3-HQN, respectively. The new HPLC method is simple, rapid, selective, reproducible and cost-effective. As demonstrated in three volunteers, it will facilitate the conducting of simultaneous therapeutic monitoring of quinine and ritonavir in patients concurrently receiving both drugs.

Effects of prior administration of amodiaquine on the disposition of halofantrine in healthy volunteers.

The prevalence of multidrug-resistant malaria parasites brings about the switch from an antimalarial drug with poor therapeutic outcome to an effective alternative, resulting in overlap in the plasma drug levels. In this study, the influence of prior administration of amodiaquine on the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic effect of halofantrine (HF) was investigated in healthy volunteers. Ten healthy male subjects were each given single oral doses of 500 mg HF alone or with 600 mg of amodiaquine hydrochloride (AQ) administered 24 hours before the HF dose in a crossover fashion. Blood samples, collected at predetermined time intervals, were analyzed for HF and its major metabolite, desbutylhalofantrine (HFM) using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. Electrocardiogram for each volunteer was taken at predetermined time points. Results showed that prior administration of amodiaquine resulted in no significant changes (P > 0.05) in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters of HF. For example, the parameter values for HF alone and with AQ were: Cmax 144 +/- 53 versus 164 +/- 58 microg/L; T1/2beta 142 +/- 23 versus 139 +/- 28 hours; Cl/F 37.3 +/- 13.9 versus 32.3 +/- 11.4 L/h; and metabolic ratio 1.2 +/- 0.5 vs 1.1 +/- 0.6 Similarly, the disposition of HFM was not significantly altered (P > 0.05) after an earlier exposure to amodiaquine. In addition, the presence of AQ was linked with a further lengthening of the QT interval compared with the effect of HF alone. This study suggests that prior administration of AQ does not result in a significant alteration of the pharmacokinetics of HF but may be associated with an increased risk of QT prolongation. It may be necessary to exercise caution in the use of HF for malaria treatment in persons who have recently received AQ.