Effects of pitavastatin on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in hyperlipidemic patients.

The effects of statins on two platelet activation markers, plasiminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 and adiponectin, were investigated in 68 patients with hyperlipidemia. The patients were treated with pitavastatin with a dosage of 2 mg daily. The plasma levels of platelet-derived microparticles (PDMP), soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L), sP-selectin, PAI-1, and adiponectin were measured at baseline and after 6 months of treatment in both groups. In hyperlipidemic patients, the plasma levels were higher in PDMP, sCD40L, sP-selectin, and PAI-1, and lower in adiponectin, compared to the normolipidemic controls. Plasma PDMP and sCD40L were positively correlated, while plasma adiponectin was negatively correlated with the plasma levels of PAI-1. No significant differences were observed in the plasma levels of PDMP, sCD40L, sP-selectin, and PAI-1 before and after treatment. A significant increase in plasma adiponectin levels was observed after 6 months of treatment with pitavastatin. When the patients treated with pitavastatin were divided into two groups according to the adiponectin response to pitavastatin treatment, significant decreases in plasma PAI-1, PDMP, and sCD40L levels were observed after pitavastatin treatment in the responder group. These findings suggest that PDMP, sCD40L, and PAI-1 may participate in the development of atherothrombosis in patients with hyperlipidemia, and that pitavastatin may exert an adiponectin-dependent anti-atherothrombotic effect in hyperlipidemic patients.

Effects of pitavastatin on monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in hyperlipidemic patients.

The effects of statins on platelet activation markers, chemokines and adiponectin, were investigated in 135 patients with hyperlipidemia. Of the 135 hyperlipidemic patients, 63 were allocated to the simvastatin group, treated with simvastatin at the dose of 10 mg daily, and the remaining 72 were allocated to the pitavastatin group, treated with pitavastatin at the dose of 2 mg daily. Plasma levels of platelet-derived microparticles (PDMP), cell adhesion molecules (sCD40L and sP-selectin), chemokines [monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted] and adiponectin were measured at the baseline and after 6 months of treatment in both the groups. In addition, we carried out a basic study to investigate the MCP-1-dependent induction of tissue factor expression on a histiocytic cell line (U937 cells). The plasma levels of PDMP, sCD40L, sP-selectin, regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted and MCP-1 were higher, whereas those of adiponectin were lower, in the hyperlipidemic patients than in the normolipidemic controls. Plasma PDMP and sCD40L were positively correlated, whereas plasma adiponectin was negatively correlated, with the plasma levels of MCP-1. No significant differences in the plasma levels of PDMP, sCD40L, sP-selectin, regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted and MCP-1 measured before and after treatment were observed in either the simvastatin or pitavastatin group. A significant increase of the plasma adiponectin levels was observed after 6 months of treatment with pitavastatin but not after an equal duration of treatment with simvastatin. When pitavastatin-treated patients were divided into two groups according to the adiponectin response to pitavastatin treatment, significant decreases of the plasma MCP-1, PDMP and sCD40L levels were observed after pitavastatin treatment in the responder group. In the aforementioned basic study, MCP-1 by itself did not induce the expression of tissue factor on the U937 cells. However, the recombinant sCD40L-induced expression of tissue factor on U937 was enhanced by the addition of MCP-1. These findings suggest that PDMP, sCD40L and MCP-1 may participate in the development of atherothrombosis in patients with hyperlipidemia and that pitavastatin may exert an adiponectin-dependent antiatherothrombotic effect in hyperlipidemic patients.

Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on endothelial cell-derived microparticles, angiopoietins and adiponectin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of endothelial cell-derived microparticles (EDMP), angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and adiponectin in hyperlipidemic patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to compare the two for the effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) on these markers. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six hyperlipidemic patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus received EPA 1,800 mg daily, and 50 of the patients were non-diabetic. RESULTS: EDMP and Ang-2 levels prior to treatment were higher in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic patients, whereas adiponectin levels were lower in diabetics. When diabetic patients were classified into two groups on the basis of Ang-2 levels, the levels of all markers remained unchanged in those without a high Ang-2 level after EPA treatment. In contrast, all markers except for adiponectin were decreased significantly in diabetic patients with high Ang-2 levels after 6 months of EPA treatment. These diabetic patients with high Ang-2 levels displayed a more significant increase in adiponectin levels after EPA treatment than those who did not. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that EPA possesses an adiponectin-dependent anti-atherosclerotic effect and may be beneficial for the prevention of vascular complications in diabetic patients with high Ang-2 levels.

The effects of pitavastatin, eicosapentaenoic acid and combined therapy on platelet-derived microparticles and adiponectin in hyperlipidemic, diabetic patients.

Platelet-derived microparticles (PDMP) play an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic vasculopathy, and statins or eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) have been shown to have a beneficial effect on atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic patients. However, the influence of EPA and statins on PDMP and adiponectin in atherosclerosis is poorly understood. We investigated the effect of pitavastatin and EPA on circulating levels of PDMP and adiponectin in hyperlipidemic patients with type II diabetes. A total of 191 hyperlipidemic patients with type II diabetes were divided into three groups: group A received pitavastatin 2 mg once daily (n = 64), group B received EPA 1800 mg daily (n = 55) and group C received both drugs (n = 72). PDMP and adiponectin were measured by ELISA at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of drug treatment. Thirty normolipidemic patients were recruited as healthy controls. PDMP levels prior to treatment in hyperlipidemic patients with diabetes were higher than levels in healthy controls (10.4 +/- 1.9 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.4 U/ml, p < 0.0001), and adiponectin levels were lower than controls (3.20 +/- 0.49 vs. 5.98 +/- 0.42 microg/ml, p < 0.0001). PDMP decreased significantly in group B (before vs. 6M, 10.6 +/- 2.0 vs. 8.0 +/- 1.7 U/ml, p < 0.01), but not in group A (before vs. 6M, 9.4 +/- 1.9 vs. 9.6 +/- 1.7 U/ml, not significant). In contrast, group A exhibited a significant increase in adiponectin levels after treatment (before vs. 6M, 3.29 +/- 0.51 vs. 4.16 +/- 0.60 microg/ml, p < 0.001). Furthermore, group C exhibited significant improvement in both PDMP and adiponectin levels after treatment (PDMP, before vs. 6M, 11.2 +/- 2.0 vs. 4.5 +/- 2.7 U/ml, p < 0.001; adiponectin, before vs. 6M, 3.24 +/- 0.41 vs. 4.02 +/- 0.70 microg/ml, p < 0.001). Reductions of PDMP in combined therapy were significantly greater than those observed with EPA alone (p < 0.05 by ANOVA). In addition, soluble CD40 ligand exhibited almost the same change as PDMP in all therapy groups. These results suggest that pitavastatin possesses an adiponectin-dependent antiatherosclerotic effect, and this drug is able to enhance the anti-platelet effect of EPA. The combination therapy of pitavastatin and EPA may be beneficial for the prevention of vascular complication in hyperlipidemic patients with type II diabetes.

Correlation between adiponectin and reduction of cell adhesion molecules after pitavastatin treatment in hyperlipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The aim of this study was to determine whether pitavastatin may prevent the progression of atherosclerotic changes in hyperlipidemic patients. Seventy-five hyperlipidemic patients with and without type 2 diabetes were enrolled to receive pitavastatin 2 mg daily. Cell adhesion molecules (sCD40L, sP-selectin, sE-selectin, and sL-selectin), chemokines (MCP-1 and RANTES) and adiponectin were measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of pitavastatin treatment. Adiponectin levels prior to pitavastatin treatment in hyperlipidemic patients with and without diabetes were lower than levels in normolipidemic controls. Both total cholesterol and the LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased significantly after pitavastatin administration. Additionally, hyperlipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes exhibited a significant increase in adiponectin levels after pitavastatin treatment (before vs. 3 months, 6 months, 2.81+/-0.95 vs. 3.84+/-0.84 microg/ml (p<0.01), 4.61+/-1.15 mug/ml (p<0.001)). Furthermore, hyperlipidemic diabetics exhibited significant decreases in sE-selectin and sL-selectin levels after 6 months of pitavastatin treatment (sE-selectin, before vs. 6 months, 74+/-21 vs. 51+/-10 ng/ml, p<0.05; sL-selectin, before vs. 6 months, 896+/-141 vs. 814+/-129 ng/ml, p<0.05). In addition, adiponectin showed significant correlation with sE-selectin and sL-selectin in diabetic hyperlipidemia. However, MCP-1, RANTES and sCD40L did not exhibit any differences before or after pitavastatin administration. These results suggest that pitavastatin possesses an adiponectin-dependent anti-atherosclerotic effect in hyperlipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes in addition to its lowering effects on total cholesterol and LDL-C.

Effect of valsartan on monocyte/endothelial cell activation markers and adiponectin in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Angiotensin II receptor blockade has been shown to have a beneficial effect on the angiopathies of hypertension and hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade on monocyte and endothelial cell adhesion markers in type 2 diabetes is poorly understood. We investigated the effects of valsartan on these markers in 53 hypertensive patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Levels of monocyte activation markers (soluble CD14: 2.1+/-0.9 vs. 3.3+/-1.4 microg/ml, p<0.01; monocyte chemotactic peptide: 392+/-94 vs. 489+/-114 pg/ml, p<0.05; and monocyte-derived microparticles: 264+/-98 vs. 511+/-128/microL, p<0.01) and endothelial cell activation markers (soluble E-selectin: 41+/-11 vs. 61+/-20 ng/ml, p<0.001; and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1: 478+/-82 vs. 584+/-101 ng/ml, p<0.01) were significantly increased in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes compared to normotensive controls. In addition, the concentrations of adiponectin were significantly decreased in patients with type 2 diabetes (8.1+/-3.1 vs. 5.2+/-2.5 microg/ml, p<0.01). Regardless of the presence of diabetic complications, both systolic and diastolic blood pressures significantly decreased after valsartan administration (valsartan 80 mg/day for 8 weeks). Monocyte and endothelial cell activation markers were decreased significantly in patients with type 2 diabetes after valsartan treatment, but not in non-type 2 diabetic patients. In addition, valsartan alleviated hypoadiponectinemia in hypertensive patients with diabetes (before vs. after: 5.2+/-2.5 vs. 7.6+/-2.7 microg/ml, p<0.001) but did not increase adiponectin levels in the non-diabetic hypertensive group, for which the average adiponectin level was normal prior to treatment. These results suggest angiotensin II receptor blockade (valsartan) may be beneficial as an anti-atherosclerotic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes in addition to its anti-hypertensive action.

5-HT2A receptor antagonist increases circulating adiponectin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

We compared the levels of plasma adiponectin, platelet activation markers (P-selectin, CD63, PAC-1, annexin V, and platelet-derived microparticles), and endothelial injury markers (soluble E-selectin and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1) in 53 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to investigate potential contributions to diabetic vascular complications. In addition, we administered serotonin antagonist (sarpogrelate hydrochloride) to type 2 diabetes patients who had increased soluble E-selectin levels. The concentrations of platelet activation markers and endothelial injury markers in diabetic patients were significantly higher than those in normal subjects. However, levels of adiponectin were lower in type 2 diabetes patients than in control subjects. A total of 32 patients had high-soluble E-selectin levels (soluble E-selectin >or= 62 ng/ml); a subset of patients that also had significant elevation of platelet activation and endothelial injury markers compared with patients without high soluble E-selectin. In addition, both platelet-P-selectin and platelet-derived microparticle levels negatively correlated with the adiponectin level. Patients with high soluble E-selectin exhibited significant improvement of all markers after sarpogrelate hydrochloride treatment. These findings suggest that there is a link between vascular change in type 2 diabetes and activated platelets, endothelial dysfunction, and an adiponectin abnormality.

Long-term treatment with nifedipine modulates procoagulant marker and C-C chemokine in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

In type 2 diabetes mellitus, there is increased risk of nephropathy and cardiovascular complications and the incidence of renal failure increases in advanced stages of the disease. Nifedipine, a dihydropyridine-type calcium antagonist, improves endothelial function in hypercholesterolemia by enhancing nitric oxide function, and increases endothelial nitric oxide bioavailability by antioxidative mechanisms. We administered nifedipine, 50 mg/day, to the hypertensive patients for 12 months. There were no other changes in any of the patient's pharmacologic regimen during nifedipine treatment. Clinical and biochemical data obtained before and after nifedipine administration were compared. All markers were measured by ELISA. The levels of platelet activation markers (CD62P, CD63, PAC-1, and Annexin V), microparticles (PDMP and MDMP), RANTES and soluble adhesion markers (sP-selectin and sVCAM-1) differed in the control group and the hypertension group. The levels of these markers were also different in hypertensive patients with and without type 2 diabetes but were unchanged in patients without diabetes in comparison to the control group. However, the concentrations of MDMPs, chemokines, and soluble adhesion markers in hypertensive patients without type 2 diabetes decreased significantly following nifedipine treatment, although the level of RANTES was unchanged. Systolic blood pressure correlated with CD62P, CD63, annexin V, and RANTES levels, and diastolic blood pressure with CD62P and annexin V levels. The effect of nifedipine on platelet activation markers and C-C chemokines in the present study indicates potential effectiveness of calcium antagonist therapy for hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.

Losartan and simvastatin inhibit platelet activation in hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients also show hypercoagulability and platelet hyperaggregability, with increased levels of platelet activation-markers such as P-selectin (CD62P) and platelet-derived microparticles. We investigated the effects of losartan and simvastatin on circulating levels of platelet activation markers, microparticles, soluble selectins, and soluble cell adhesion molecules in hypertensive and hyperlipidemic patients with or without Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The subjects included 25 normotensive healthy controls and 41 hypertensive patients. The 41 hypertensive patients were divided into three groups: group A had hypertension and hyperlipidemia (n = 11), group B had hypertension and Type 2 diabetes (n = 14), and group C had hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes (n = 16). Losartan was administered to all of the patients at a dose of 50 mg/day for 24 weeks. In addition, simvastatin was administered to the hyperlipidemic patients at a dose of 10 mg/day for 24 weeks. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the levels of CD62P, CD63, PAC-1, platelet microparticles, endothelial microparticles, sE-selectin, and sVCAM-1 between the hypertensive patients and healthy controls. These markers were all significantly increased in hypertensive and hyperlipidemic patients with Type 2 diabetes. In hypertensive patients with diabetes, CD62P, CD63, PAC-1, platelet and endothelial microparticles, and soluble adhesion markers were all decreased by losartan monotherapy. The decrease of each marker in hypertensive and hyperlipidemic patients given combined therapy with losartan plus simvastatin was greater among those with than without Type 2 diabetes. Low-density lipoprotein was decreased significantly by simvastatin and was correlated with CD62P or platelet microparticles in all of the patients. CONCLUSION: Administration of losartan plus simvastatin to hypertensive and hyperlipidemic patients with Type 2 diabetes may prevent the development of cardiovascular complications caused by activated platelets and microparticles via another mechanism in addition to reduction of the blood pressure or lipid levels.