Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 37(3): 289-98, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20436373

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study examines the adhesiveness of hydrocolloid wafers and its relationship to physical damage of the underlying skin. DESIGN: Observational study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: All subjects received ostomy care at the Tokyo Ostomy Center and outpatient departments of 4 hospitals in Tokyo, Japan. One hundred ninety-four of 917 patients receiving care over a 23-year span agreed to participate in the research. Subjects met 2 inclusion criteria: (1) ostomy management was performed using a combination of skin barriers and an adhesive ostomy pouch; and (2) the patient's medical file and color photographs were available, allowing analysis of the peristomal skin over time. INSTRUMENT: Photographs were taken with an Olympus (OM2) camera equipped with an Olympus macro lens and a ring flash. METHODS: We analyzed the impact of the adhesive force of various hydrocolloid wafers on the underlying skin. Photographs were digitized and systematically examined the peristomal skin exposed to regular use of skin barriers. The observation period varied among individual patients, ranging from 1 week to 30 years after surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of dermatologic changes (active, inactive, and area cutanea changes) was lower in patients who used skin barriers with adhesive force of not more than 2 Newtons(N) than among those using higher forces (>2 N). Specifically, there was a significant difference in change of the area cutanea. The incidence of papules and erosion was unrelated to the adhesive force of skin barriers. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the peristomal skin is irritated by repeated peeling, resulting in physical damage to the horny layer of the skin. The presence of papules and erosion was not associated with the adhesive force of skin barriers. This finding suggests that these changes are associated with an inflammatory process, possibly caused by chemical substances within the skin barrier.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/adverse effects , Bandages, Hydrocolloid/adverse effects , Ostomy/nursing , Skin Diseases/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colostomy/nursing , Female , Humans , Ileostomy/nursing , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Skin Diseases/pathology , Skin Diseases/prevention & control , Urinary Diversion/nursing
2.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 33(5): 510-6; discussion 516-7, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17133139

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a more effective method to evaluate the adhesive properties of skin barriers. DESIGN: The experimental design used was based on 3 principles: partial control, randomization, and repetition. Using these principles, the 180-degree peeling tests were conducted as specified in a standardized methodology (JIS Z0297) to the extent possible. However, the use of a stainless steel plate as a proxy for skin barrier application may result in the stretching and breaking of the skin barrier, making it impossible to obtain suitable measurements. INSTRUMENTS: Tests were conducted in constant temperature/ humidity chambers using a Tensilon Automatic Elongation Tester, where a sample was fixed on the side of a sample immobilization device, a sturdy metal (aluminum) box from which the air in the box was drawn off with a vacuum pump. METHODS: A fluorocarbon polymer film was applied to the adhesive surface of a sample skin barrier. The film was peeled off in the volte-face (180-degree) direction in order to measure adhesive strengths. RESULTS: The films exhibit such properties as (a) ease of removal from the adhesive surface, (b) no resistance to a 180-degree fold back due to the thinness and flexibility of the material, and (c) tolerance of elongation. The adhesive properties of skin barriers were measured by peeling the fluorocarbon polymers in a 180-degree direction. Twelve specimen skin barrier products were selected for measurement, providing results with satisfactory reproducibility. Results based on the conventional stainless steel plate-based testing method acted as a control. CONCLUSION: The newly developed testing method enables chronological measurement results for skin barriers applied to fluorocarbon polymer films after 24 hours, 48 hours, and longer period.


Subject(s)
Adhesives , Bandages , Fluorocarbon Polymers , Materials Testing/methods , Materials Testing/standards , Adhesiveness , Adhesives/standards , Elasticity , Fluorocarbon Polymers/standards , Humans , Humidity , Research Design , Temperature , Tensile Strength , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...