Comparative in vivo efficacy of meropenem, imipenem, and cefepime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa expressing MexA-MexB-OprM efflux pumps.

To identify the optimal pharmacodynamic exposures of meropenem, imipenem, and cefepime, and the emergence of resistance in vivo for Pseudomonas aeruginosa overexpressing MexA-MexB-OprM efflux pumps, we used the murine thigh model. Mice were challenged with P. aeruginosa isolates: PAO1 (K767 wild type), K767+ (MexA-MexB-OprM efflux mutant), and DeltaK767 (knockout strain). Efficacy (Delta log colony-forming unit [CFU]) was determined at various exposures of %T > MIC at both standard (10(5) CFU/thigh) and high (10(7) CFU/thigh) inoculums. At 10(5) CFU/thigh, meropenem and imipenem produced a maximal activity against PAO1 (-2.82, -1.88) and K767+ (-2.24, -2.68) at 40%T > MIC; cefepime at 70%T > MIC produced a comparable kill (-2.74 and -2.19, respectively). Similar magnitudes of kill were observed at the 10(7) inocula. Except for DeltaK767 with cefepime, no development of resistance emerged at various %T > MIC. All agents exhibited reduced activity against DeltaK767. DeltaK767 cefepime-resistant strains were isolated up to 100%T > MIC. The overexpression of MexA-MexB-OprM efflux pumps did not result in the loss of efficacy of the antibiotics tested regardless of the amount of bacterial inocula; however, their presence also did not lead to increased selection for resistance. The effects of efflux mechanisms on beta-lactam agents in vivo warrant further research.

Penetration, efflux and intracellular activity of tigecycline in human polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the penetration, efflux and intracellular activity of tigecycline in human polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs). METHODS: PMNs were isolated from fresh whole blood and tested for viability and purity prior to use. Tigecycline drug uptake was evaluated by incubating 5 x 10(6) cells/mL at 37 degrees C up to 3 h at tigecycline concentrations of 1, 2, 5 and 10 mg/L. Drug efflux from PMNs was determined following a 2 h incubation with tigecycline at 10 mg/L. Its intracellular activity against Staphylococcus aureus was evaluated following tigecycline extracellular exposures of 1 mg/L. RESULTS: Tigecycline uptake was rapid and achieved high concentrations within PMNs with maximal penetration noted at 1 h of incubation. At 1 h, dose-dependent intracellular concentrations ranged from 15.83 +/- 11.09 mg/L to 264 +/- 54.60 mg/L at tigecycline 1 and 10 mg/L, respectively. At these exposures, intracellular drug concentrations were approximately 20 and 30 times higher at 1 h than extracellular concentrations. By 3 h, tigecycline displayed sustained high intracellular exposures. Tigecycline cell efflux followed first order kinetics with a half-life of 1.39 h. Tigecycline was bacteriostatic against intracellular S. aureus. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline rapidly achieved high intracellular concentrations in PMNs and exhibited static activity against S. aureus supporting its potential clinical utilization.

Pharmacokinetic profile of tigecycline in serum and skin blister fluid of healthy subjects after multiple intravenous administrations.

The pharmacokinetics of tigecycline, when given as a 100-mg loading dose followed by 50 mg every 12 h, were determined in serum and blister fluid. The peak tigecycline concentration and half-life in serum were greater than those in blister fluid. Tigecycline penetrates into blister fluid well, with a mean penetration rate of 74%.

Pharmacodynamic modeling of imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam for empiric therapy of skin and soft tissue infections: a report from the OPTAMA Program.

BACKGROUND: The bactericidal exposures necessary for positive clinical outcomes among skin and soft tissue infections are largely dependent on interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and pathogen drug susceptibility. By simulating the probability of achieving target bactericidal exposures, the pharmacodynamics of three beta-lactam agents were compared against a range of pathogens implicated commonly in complicated skin and soft tissue infections. METHODS: Using Monte Carlo simulation, pharmacodynamic target attainment expressed as the percentage of the time interval during which the antibiotic concentration exceeded the minimal inhibitory concentration (%T > MIC) in serum and blister fluid was calculated for 5,000 simulated patients receiving imipenem-cilastatin 0.5 g q8h, meropenem 0.5 g q8h, piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g q6h, and piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g q8h. The pharmacokinetics for each antibiotic were derived from previously published healthy volunteer studies. The MICs for Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter sp., Klebsiella sp., coagulase-negative staphylococci, Proteus sp., beta-hemolytic streptococci, and Serratia sp. were taken from the MYSTIC 2003 surveillance study and weighted by the prevalence of each pathogen among 1,404 isolates collected from skin and soft tissue infections during the 2000 SENTRY study. The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was added into the model at increasing resistance rates. RESULTS: Imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g q6h achieved greater than 90% likelihood of achieving bactericidal exposure in serum and blister fluid until the prevalence of MRSA increased beyond 10%. Piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g q8h achieved a lower probability of achieving bactericidal exposure than the other regimens (88.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When the incidence of MRSA is low, imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g q6h would be optimal choices for the empiric treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections among the regimens studied. When MRSA is suspected, a drug that retains activity against this pathogen should be considered.