Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a multicenter study on 81 cases.

BACKGROUND: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease characterized by a difficult diagnosis, different types of presentation, variable course and poor prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients with MPM observed in 14 Italian oncology institutions from 1982 to 2007 have been examined with the aim of delineating the history of MPM. RESULTS: Presentation symptoms were ascites, abdominal pain, asthenia, weight loss, anorexia, abdominal mass, fever, diarrhea and vomiting in various associations. Computed tomography scan and echotomography signs were ascites, abdominal mass and peritoneal thickening. Peritoneal fluid cytology (61 cases) was positive for mesothelioma in 31 and for malignancy, not mesothelioma, in 13. Laparoscopy was carried out in 40 cases and laparotomy in 36. Thrombocytosis was present in 59 cases. Associated tumors diagnosed during the lifetime were colorectal cancer in two cases and cheek carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, tongue carcinoma, bladder carcinoma and testicular seminoma. Thirty patients were treated with surgery and 45 with chemotherapy. The median survival time from diagnosis is 13 months. Ascites, fever and vomiting were significative variables at presentation; only vomiting holds significance in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: MPM is a disease with various types of presentation, frequently associated with thrombocytosis, sometimes with other tumors. Survival and diagnosis time can differ in various types of MPM. Prognosis is poor.

Cisplatin versus carboplatin in combination with mitomycin and vinblastine in advanced non small cell lung cancer. A multicenter, randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: In advanced not selected NSCLC chemotherapy achieved an advantage of approximately 1-2 months on median survival versus best supportive care. Chemotherapy seems to improve symptoms control, even if randomised studies with quality of life as first endpoint are lacking and often chemotherapy toxicity compromises the frail cost/benefit ratio. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the impact on QoL, substituting cisplatin, a pivot drug in NSCLC therapy, with carboplatin, an analogue with an improved toxicity profile. The combination of cisplatin with Mitomycin and Vinblastine was one of the most frequently used in the palliative setting at the time of design of our study. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive MVP regimen (Mitomycin-C 8 mg/m2 d1, Vinblastine 4 mg/m2 d 1-8, Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 d1) or MVC regimen (Mitomycin-C 8 mg/m2 d1, Vinblastine 4 mg/m2 d 1-8, Carboplatin 300 mg/m2 d1) every 3 weeks. The QoL was evaluated by the Spitzer QL-Index and by the EORTC QLQ-C30+LC 13 questionnaires before chemotherapy, after one cycle, after three cycles, and then every 6 weeks in the first 6 months and every 3 months thenafter. RESULTS: From September 1994 to July 1997, 153 consecutive patients were randomized to MVP (75 patients) or MVC arm (78 patients). Despite difficulties in carrying out and analysing QoL items in such patients, the global QoL evaluated by the Spitzer's questionnaire suggested an advantage for MVC regimen (P=0.05) and a significant difference was observed in global health subdomain (P=0.04). The disease-related symptoms improved with time, and the benefits lasted for the entire treatment period. When evaluated with the EORTC questionnaire there was significantly less nausea and vomiting (P=0.0001), appetite loss (P=0.01), insomnia (P=0.03), constipation (P=0.01) and peripheral neuropathy (P=0.01) in favour of MVC, and a trend for less hair loss (P=0.05). The advantage lasted for all the duration of chemotherapy. No differences were observed in global quality of life subdomain (P=0.40) between the two regimen. QoL was the first endpoint and the statistical power was inadequate to assess other parameters. However, we reported a response rate of 43.1 and 38.6%, respectively, in MVP and MVC arm (P=0.59) and a median survival of 10.2 and 7.2 months, respectively, for cisplatin and carboplatin arm (P=0.39). CONCLUSIONS: The carboplatin containing regimen (MVC) has a significant better toxicity profile than the cisplatin containing (MVP) regimen as proven both by the EORTC questionnaires and by the WHO toxicity data reported by physicians. No significant differences in terms of response rate, time to progression and overall survival were observed between the two regimen. The two chemotherapy regimen showed a similar effectiveness in symptom palliation when evaluated with C30 addendum of EORTC QOL questionnaire. With the Spitzer's questionnaires a trend towards an improved quality of life index was observed during treatment with the carboplatin combination in comparison to the cisplatin combination. This difference, however, was not observed when the global quality of life was evaluated with the EORTC patients compiled questionnaires. A carboplatin containing regimen with better toxicity profile and a similar potentiality for symptoms control offers an option in comparison to similar cisplatin containing combinations in the palliative treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine: a phase I-II trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Gruppo Studio Tumori Polmonari Veneto (GSTPV).

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) is an effective treatment for advanced NSCLC. Gemcitabine (G) is an active new drug. We planned a phase I study to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the PCG combination. A phase II study was subsequently conducted to evaluate the activity and toxicity of PCG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients entered the study. Twenty-eight had stage IIIA-B disease, 17 stage IV. In the phase I study, with a fixed dose of C at AUC = 6 on day 1, P was escalated using increments of 25 mg/m2 starting from 175 mg/m2 on day 1 and G with increments of 200 mg/m2 starting from 800 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8. RESULTS: Fourteen patients entered the phase I study. The MTD was reached at P 200 mg/m2, C AUC = 6 and G 1000 mg/m2. Neutropenic fever and grade 3 diarrhea were the dose limiting toxicities. Thirty-one patients were treated in the phase II study with P 175 mg/m2, C AUC = 6 and G 1000 mg/m2. Response rate was 57% (68% in stage III and 47% in stage IV). Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with grade 3-4 leukopenia occurring in 35% of cases. Grade 3 anemia was observed in 24% of cases and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 34% of patients. Non-hematological toxicity was mild. Median survival and one-year actuarial survival were 20.5 months and 74% for stage III and 11.5 months and 47% for stage IV. CONCLUSIONS: PCG is a promising regimen for treating advanced NSCLC. A phase III study comparing PCG to paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced NSCLC is ongoing. On the other hand, we are planning to introduce the PCG regimen in the treatment of stage II-III patients in the setting of a multimodality treatment.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin: a phase I study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

In the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has significant activity and carboplatin has single-agent activity comparable with that of cisplatin, with less pronounced nonhematologic toxicity. The optimal doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin in combination have not been determined. We designed a phase I study combining a fixed paclitaxel dose of 175 mg/m2, administered either by 3- or 1-hour infusion, with escalating doses of carboplatin given every 4 weeks. The starting carboplatin dose was 175 mg/m2, with planned dose increases in increments of 25 mg/m2. The primary study objective was to find the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. Secondary objectives were to determine the toxicity profile, response rate, and feasibility of a 1-hour paclitaxel infusion with steroid premedication delivered only 1 hour before the paclitaxel infusion. Eligibility criteria included age 18 to 75 years, no prior chemotherapy, stage IIIB to IV disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, no second tumors, measurable or evaluable disease, and informed consent. We achieved a carboplatin dose level of 300 mg/m2 without reaching the maximum tolerated dose. The dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia. However, only one patient had a neutrophil count less than 500/microL during the first cycle. Other toxicities during the first and remaining 73 delivered cycles were mild to moderate. Only one patient had treatment delayed, and no dose reductions were necessary. Of 22 patients entered, 19 were evaluable for response (two were not evaluable and one was too early to evaluate). Six partial responses (31%; 95% confidence interval, 13% to 57%), five (26%) stable diseases, and eight (42%) disease progressions were observed. No additional side effects were observed with the 1-hour paclitaxel infusion and single-dose steroid premedication 1 hour before chemotherapy. The study will continue until the paclitaxel/carboplatin maximum tolerated dose is reached.

Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer stage III patients. Feasibility, toxicity and long-term results of a phase II study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, the response rate and the effect on survival of full dose polychemotherapy delivered concurrently with bifractionated radiotherapy at a radical dose, in a subset of patients with marginally resectable or unresectable stage IIIA-B non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Treatment consisted of two courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 for 1 day plus etoposide 120 mg/m2 for 3 days delivered from day 1 to day 22, plus radiotherapy delivered in two cycles of 2560 cGy each from day 3 to day 12 and from day 24 to 33 (total dose 5120 cGy in 31 days). The daily dose was 320 cGy in two equal fractions. After surgery, three additional courses of cisplatin plus etoposide were planned. From February 1988 to June 1991, 39 patients with stage III NSCLC (19 were judged as having marginally resectable, 20 as having unresectable disease) were entered into the study. Out of 39 patients (22 squamous cell carcinoma, 17 adeno/large cell carcinoma), 24 had stage IIIa (62%) and 15 stage IIIb (38%). Median PS was 80 (70-90). A total of 78 (74 evaluable) concurrent cycles of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy were delivered. The prominent side-effect was leucopenia: leucopenia > or = grade 3 at nadir occurred in 20 cycles (27%), thrombocytopenia > or = grade 3 at nadir in seven cycles (9%), 19 patients (54%) had a treatment delay of 1 week between the two cycles. Other important toxicities were sepsis in 5 patients (13%), oesophagitis > grade 2 in 9 patients (23%) and pneumonitis in 5 patients (13%). The response rate was 67% (6 CR (complete response), 16%; 19 PR (partial response), 51%). A resection was subsequently performed in 20 (51%) patients: 14 out of 19 marginally resectable (74%) and 6 out 20 initially unresectable (30%) patients. One other patient had an exploratory thoracotomy. Surgical specimens were tumour-free in 3 patients (14%); in 8 patients (38%) only microscopic tumour was found, and in 10 (48%) macroscopic residual tumour was found. Out of 23 patients attaining a CR, 5 relapsed locally and 11 only distantly. At present, with a follow-up ranging from 64 to 90 months, 34 patients have died, 1 is alive with recurrent disease and 4 (17%) are alive without evidence of disease. Median survival was 16 months, with 18% 3-year survivors and 13% 5-year survivors. Resected patients had a median survival of 21 months, versus 10 months for unresected patients (P = 0.01). No significant difference was evident between stage IIIa and stage IIIb patients.

Mitomycin C, vinblastine, and carboplatin regimen in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. A phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The mitomycin C, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP) combination is one of the most frequently used in the palliative setting, but it produces considerable toxicity. Carboplatin and cisplatin have different patterns of toxicity. The goal of this study was to evaluate a combination similar to MVP, using carboplatin instead of cisplatin to render it more feasible in an outpatient setting. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for this study included: inoperable patients or patients relapsing after previous surgery, with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), a performance status (PS) > 50%, and no previous chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen included carboplatin, 300 mg/m2 on Day 1; mitomycin, 8 mg/m2 on Day 1; and vinblastine, 4 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 (on Day 15 vinblastine was delivered only in the first cycle) (MVC) every 3 weeks for at least 3 cycles. RESULTS: From August 1991 until August 1994, 70 patients entered the trial. All were evaluable for toxicity and response. The median age was 62 years (range, 40-73 years). The male/female ratio was 60:10 (86%:14%); the ratio of Stage III to Stage IV disease was 26:44 (37%:63%); and the ratio of PS > 70 to < or = 70 was 49:21. A total of 296 cycles (median, 4 [range, 1-6 cycles] per patient) were delivered, 280 of 296 (95%) in an outpatient setting with only 4 patients requiring hospitalization for treatment delivery. Overall response rate (RR) was 38.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27-51%) (1 complete response, 1.5%; 26 partial responses, 37.1%). Median duration of response was 9.8 months (range, 2-27 months). In Stage III patients the RR was 42% and in Stage IV patients it was 34%. Overall median survival was 9.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-15.3 months). Survival at 1 year was 39% (standard error [SE] 3.6%) and was 11% at 2 years (SE 3.6%). In Stage III patients median survival was 13 months and the 1-year survival rate was 54% (SE 10%); Stage IV patients had a median survival of 7.4 months and a 1-year survival rate of 28% (SE 7%). Delivered dose intensity was: carboplatin, 71%; vinblastine, 60%; and mitomycin C, 77% of the planned dose intensity. The back calculation of carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) with Calvert's formula and with the Cockcroft-Gault glomerular filtration rate estimation, showed a median AUC value of 4 (range, 2-8). Using the more precise Chatelut formula, AUC was again 4 (range, 2-7). Hematologic toxicity was the major side effect; Grades 3 and 4 leukopenia were observed in 34% and 6% of patients, respectively, and Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 25% and 4% of patients, respectively. Grade 2 infection occurred in 10% of patients, with only 1 case of sepsis; severe constipation and Grade 2 alopecia occurred in only 1 patient; and no case of higher than Grade 1 nephrotoxicity was observed. No pulmonary toxicity was observed. Compliance with treatment was good with only one patient refusal after the first cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy for advanced NSCLS is still controversial, because effectiveness in terms of RR and symptom control must be weighed against treatment toxicity and costs. From our study it appears that MVC is easy to deliver in an outpatient setting, and has good patient compliance, low toxicity profile, and promising RR and response duration. The substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin in regimens for advanced NSCLC should be considered.