Schlafen 11 further sensitizes BRCA-deficient cells to PARP inhibitors through single-strand DNA gap accumulation behind replication forks.

The preferential response to PARP inhibitors (PARPis) in BRCA-deficient and Schlafen 11 (SLFN11)-expressing ovarian cancers has been documented, yet the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. As the accumulation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA) gaps behind replication forks is key for the lethality effect of PARPis, we investigated the combined effects of SLFN11 expression and BRCA deficiency on PARPi sensitivity and ssDNA gap formation in human cancer cells. PARPis increased chromatin-bound RPA2 and ssDNA gaps in SLFN11-expressing cells and even more in cells with BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficiency. SLFN11 was co-localized with chromatin-bound RPA2 under PARPis treatment, with enhanced recruitment in BRCA2-deficient cells. Notably, the chromatin-bound SLFN11 under PARPis did not block replication, contrary to its function under replication stress. SLFN11 recruitment was attenuated by the inactivation of MRE11. Hence, under PARPi treatment, MRE11 expression and BRCA deficiency lead to ssDNA gaps behind replication forks, where SLFN11 binds and increases their accumulation. As ovarian cancer patients who responded (progression-free survival >2 years) to olaparib maintenance therapy had a significantly higher SLFN11-positivity than short-responders (<6 months), our findings provide a mechanistic understanding of the favorable responses to PARPis in SLFN11-expressing and BRCA-deficient tumors. It highlight the clinical implications of SLFN11.

LIM1 contributes to the malignant potential of endometrial cancer.

Introduction: The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) has been increasing worldwide. However, because there are limited chemotherapeutic options for the treatment of EC, the prognosis of advanced-stage EC is poor. Methods: Gene expression profile datasets for EC cases registered in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was reanalyzed. Highly expressed genes in advanced-stage EC (110 cases) compared with early-stage EC (255 cases) were extracted and Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed. Among the enriched genes, Kaplan-Meier (KM) plotter analysis was performed. Candidate genes expression was analyzed in HEC50B cells and Ishikawa cells by RT-qPCR. In HEC50B cells, LIM homeobox1 (LIM1) was knocked down (KD) and cell proliferation, migration, and invasion ability of the cells were evaluated. Xenografts were generated using LIM1-KD cells and tumor growth was evaluated. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of RNA-seq data using LIM-KD cells was performed. Expression of phospho-CREB and CREB-related proteins were evaluated in LIM1-KD cells by western blotting and in xenograft tissue by immunofluorescent staining. Two different CREB inhibitors were treated in HEC50B and cell proliferation was evaluated by MTT assay. Results: Reanalysis of TCGA followed by GO enrichment analysis revealed that homeobox genes were highly expressed in advanced-stage EC. Among the identified genes, KM plotter analysis showed that high LIM1 expression was associated with a significantly poorer prognosis in EC. Additionally, LIM1 expression was significantly higher in high-grade EC cell lines, HEC50B cells than Ishikawa cells. Knockdown of LIM1 showed reduced cell proliferation, migration and invasion in HEC50B cells. Xenograft experiments revealed that tumor growth was significantly suppressed in LIM1-KD cells. IPA of RNA-seq data using LIM-KD cells predicted that the mRNA expression of CREB signaling-related genes was suppressed. Indeed, phosphorylation of CREB was decreased in LIM1-KD cells and LIM1-KD cells derived tumors. HEC50B cells treated by CREB inhibitors showed suppression of cell proliferation. Conclusion and discussion: Collectively, these results suggested that high LIM1 expression contributed to tumor growth via CREB signaling in EC. Inhibition of LIM1 or its downstream molecules would be new therapeutic strategies for EC.

Reconsidering the mechanisms of action of PARP inhibitors based on clinical outcomes.

PARP inhibitors (PARPis) were initially developed as DNA repair inhibitors that inhibit the catalytic activity of PARP1 and PARP2 and are expected to induce synthetic lethality in BRCA- or homologous recombination (HR)-deficient tumors. However, the clinical indications for PARPis are not necessarily limited to BRCA mutations or HR deficiency; BRCA wild-type and HR-proficient cancers can also derive some benefit from PARPis. These facts are interpretable by an additional primary antitumor mechanism of PARPis named PARP trapping, resulting from the stabilization of PARP-DNA complexes. Favorable response to platinum derivatives (cisplatin and carboplatin) in preceding treatment is used as a clinical biomarker for some PARPis, implying that sensitivity factors for platinum derivatives and PARPis are mainly common. Such common sensitivity factors include not only HR defects (HRD) but also additional factors. One of them is Schlafen 11 (SLFN11), a putative DNA/RNA helicase, that sensitizes cancer cells to a broad type of DNA-damaging agents, including platinum and topoisomerase inhibitors. Mechanistically, SLFN11 induces a lethal replication block in response to replication stress (ie, DNA damage). As SLFN11 acts upon replication stress, trapping PARPis can activate SLFN11. Preclinical models show the importance of SLFN11 in PARPi sensitivity. However, the relevance of SLFN11 in PARPi response is less evident in clinical data compared with the significance of SLFN11 for platinum sensitivity. In this review, we consider the reasons for variable indications of PARPis resulting from clinical outcomes and review the mechanisms of action for PARPis as anticancer agents.