Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Eval Program Plann ; 71: 36-45, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30107306

ABSTRACT

This research engaged consumers with severe and persistent mental illness receiving services in the public mental health sector in creating a comprehensive list of 110 needed community services and supports, then individually sorting and rating these items. Within the resulting concept map generated by Concept System software and as interpreted by the study participants, successfully living in the community is actualized when there is an outer layer of support regarding basic needs; financial means; individualized, comprehensive and available services; competent and caring staff; community education; legal rights enforcement; and social change directed at dismantling the discrimination and stigma associated with mental illness. Peer support and services is critical component, providing a transformational space from basic survival into recovery, supporting personal development and skills building and further social development. This study demonstrates that adult public mental health consumers actively receiving services can engage in collaborative research in meaningfully determining what their needs are, conceptualizing what the services should be and how developed, and articulating service prioritization.


Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research/organization & administration , Comprehensive Health Care/organization & administration , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Social Work, Psychiatric/organization & administration , Adult , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peer Group , Program Evaluation , Research Design , Severity of Illness Index , Social Support , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
2.
Psychiatr Rehabil J ; 31(4): 291-5, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18407877

ABSTRACT

This article summarizes the published results of the Employment Intervention Demonstration Program (EIDP), a federally-funded, multi-site study examining the effectiveness of supported employment programs for 1273 unemployed individuals with psychiatric disabilities in the U.S. Findings confirm the effectiveness of supported employment across different models, program locations, and participant populations. The study's results are discussed in the context of public policies designed to encourage return to work for those with a severe mental illness.


Subject(s)
Employment, Supported/statistics & numerical data , Employment/legislation & jurisprudence , Mental Disorders/rehabilitation , Mentally Ill Persons/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Policy , Employment, Supported/legislation & jurisprudence , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Male , Mentally Ill Persons/psychology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , United States
3.
J Rehabil Res Dev ; 44(6): 837-49, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18075941

ABSTRACT

Effects of co-occurring disorders on work outcomes were explored among individuals with severe mental illness who were participating in a multisite randomized study of supported employment. At seven sites, 1,273 people were randomly assigned to an experimental supported employment program or a control condition and followed for 2 years. Multivariate regression analysis examined work outcomes including earnings, hours worked, and competitive employment, as well as whether psychiatric disability was disclosed to coworkers and supervisors. Individuals with any comorbidity had lower earnings and were less likely to work competitively. Those with physical comorbidities had lower earnings, worked fewer hours, and were less likely to work competitively. Disclosure was more likely among those with both cognitive and physical comorbidities, as well as those with learning disabilities. Competitive employment was less likely among those with intellectual disability, visual impairment, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome. The experimental condition was positively related to all outcomes except disclosure. The results suggest that, with some exceptions, comorbidities affect employment outcomes, requiring tailored services and supports to promote vocational success.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Employment, Supported/methods , Mental Disorders/rehabilitation , Rehabilitation, Vocational/methods , Vocational Education/methods , Adult , Ambulatory Care , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/complications , Mental Disorders/psychology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Selection , United States
4.
Psychiatr Rehabil J ; 31(1): 9-22, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17694711

ABSTRACT

As mental health recovery gains traction, many people have put forward varying definitions. Few attempts have been made to create a dimensional analysis of the recovery literature that assesses the growing consensus about what recovery is or what its definition should entail. This paper incorporates an ecological framework to take the individual's life context into account while emphasizing both the reestablishment of one's mental health (i.e., first order change) and the mitigation of the oppressive nature of barriers imposed by the greater community (i.e., second order change) so that people may experience social integration and community inclusion.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Mental Disorders/rehabilitation , Social Support , Humans , Mental Disorders/psychology , Peer Group , Residence Characteristics , Social Behavior
5.
Psychiatr Serv ; 57(4): 465-71, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16603740

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 removes work disincentives and promotes access to vocational services for people with disabilities. This study calculated the amount of payments that would have been made to employment service providers if study participants had been enrolled in the Ticket program. METHODS: Data were from 450 Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries with psychiatric disabilities enrolled in a multisite study of supported employment. Earnings over two years were used to calculate provider payments under two reimbursement formulas used in the Ticket program. RESULTS: Only a quarter of service recipients (26 percent) reached earnings levels that would have triggered provider payments under the first reimbursement formula. Only 4 percent would have completed their trial work period and left the rolls, generating payments under the second formula. CONCLUSIONS: The current provider payment systems of the Ticket to Work program do not reflect the reality of rehabilitation for individuals with severe mental illness. Reforms should take into account outcomes of return-to-work services for this population.


Subject(s)
Employment/legislation & jurisprudence , Mental Disorders , Rehabilitation, Vocational/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Rehabilitation, Vocational/statistics & numerical data , Reimbursement Mechanisms , United States , United States Social Security Administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...