Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 872335, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35677430

ABSTRACT

Excitatory amino acid transporters (EAAT/SLC1) mediate Na+-dependent uptake of extracellular glutamate and are potential drug targets for neurological disorders. Conventional methods to assess glutamate transport in vitro are based on radiolabels, fluorescent dyes or electrophysiology, which potentially compromise the cell's physiology and are generally less suited for primary drug screens. Here, we describe a novel label-free method to assess human EAAT function in living cells, i.e., without the use of chemical modifications to the substrate or cellular environment. In adherent HEK293 cells overexpressing EAAT1, stimulation with glutamate or aspartate induced cell spreading, which was detected in real-time using an impedance-based biosensor. This change in cell morphology was prevented in the presence of the Na+/K+-ATPase inhibitor ouabain and EAAT inhibitors, which suggests the substrate-induced response was ion-dependent and transporter-specific. A mechanistic explanation for the phenotypic response was substantiated by actin cytoskeleton remodeling and changes in the intracellular levels of the osmolyte taurine, which suggests that the response involves cell swelling. In addition, substrate-induced cellular responses were observed for cells expressing other EAAT subtypes, as well as in a breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-468) with endogenous EAAT1 expression. These findings allowed the development of a label-free high-throughput screening assay, which could be beneficial in early drug discovery for EAATs and holds potential for the study of other transport proteins that modulate cell shape.

3.
SLAS Discov ; 27(2): 140-147, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093290

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, whole transcriptome profiling, also known as RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), has quickly gained traction as a reliable method for unbiased assessment of gene expression. Integration of RNA-seq expression data into other omics datasets (e.g., proteomics, metabolomics, or epigenetics) solidifies our understanding of cell-specific regulatory patterns, yielding pathways to investigate the key rules of gene regulation. A limitation to efficient, at-scale utilization of RNA-seq is the time-demanding library preparation workflows, which is a 2-day or longer endeavor per cohort/sample size. To tackle this bottleneck, we designed an automated workflow that increases throughput capacity, while minimizing human error to enhance reproducibility. To this end, we converted the manual protocol of the NEBNext Directional Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina on the Beckman Coulter liquid handler, Biomek i7 Hybrid workstation. A total of 84 RNA samples were isolated from two human cell lines and subjected to comparative manual and automated library preparation methods. Qualitative and quantitative results indicated a high degree of similarity between libraries generated manually or through automation. Yet, there was a significant reduction in both hands-on and assay time from a 2-day manual to a 9-hour automated workflow. Using linear regression analysis, we found the Pearson correlation coefficient between libraries generated manually or by automation to be almost identical to a sample being sequenced twice (R²= 0.985 vs 0.983). This demonstrates that high-throughput automated workflows can be of great benefit to genomic laboratories by enhancing efficiency of library preparation, reducing hands-on time and increasing throughput potential.


Subject(s)
RNA , Automation , Gene Library , Humans , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...