Effect of manuka honey socket dressing on postoperative sequelae and complications following third molar extraction: A randomized controlled study.

To evaluate the effect of manuka honey on the healing of mandibular third molar extraction sockets. This was a prospective randomized study at a tertiary health institution in Lagos, Nigeria. All extractions were transalveolar, using the distobuccal bone guttering technique. Participants were randomized into two study groups. Group A underwent intrasocket application of manuka honey, after which sockets were completely closed using the mucosal flap, while participants in group B underwent mucosal flap closure of the socket without application of manuka honey. The primary outcome was healing of the extraction socket at 7 days postoperatively. The secondary outcomes measured were postoperative sequelae, namely pain, swelling, and trismus on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, and socket healing complications - specifically inflamed socket, infected socket, and alveolar osteitis. In total, 112 participants completed the study, with 56 participants per group. There were no significant differences in demographic variables between both groups. On the 7th day postoperatively, 26.8% of participants in group B had an unhealed extraction site, compared with 10.3% of participants in group A (p = 0.029). A significant difference was observed between pre- and postoperative pain scores in both study groups (p = 0.001). A comparison of postoperative mean facial swelling between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences on all the review days (p = 0.66). The difference in postoperative socket healing complication rate between both groups was statistically significant (χ2 = 4.747, p = 0.029). Within the limitations of the study it seems that the application of manuka honey appears to aid earlier healing of the third molar extraction socket, with a significantly lower frequency of complications. Therefore, the application of manuka honey is recommended whenever appropriate.

Wound Healing Following Palatoplasty Using Either Honey or Warm Saline Mouth Bath for Postoperative Wound Care: A Randomized-Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the effect of honey or saline mouth bath for wound care on the rate of re-epithelisation of the lateral palatal defects and occurrence of early postoperative complications following palatoplasty. METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective randomized study on participants with non-syndromic cleft palate conducted at a tertiary health institution in Lagos, Nigeria. The test group received oral honey drops for post-operative care for an initial period of two weeks post-surgery, while the control group had regular oral toileting using a warm saline solution. The primary outcome was epithelisation of lateral palatal defect at 2- and 4-weeks post repair. Descriptive and comparative statistics were computed, and the p-value was set at <0.05. RESULTS: Fifty participants were recruited into the study, 24 in the Test group and 26 in the Control group. The frequency of occurrence of oronasal fistula in the Test group was 4.0% while in the Control group was 10.0%, however, this was not statistically significant. Complete epithelisation of the lateral palatal defect was clinically observed in 66.7% of the participants in the Test group at 2 weeks post-operation, while only 38.5% of participants in the Control group had clinically observed complete epithelisation at the same time point (ß = 1.70, p = .035, 95% CI 1.122-26.533). At four weeks, all wounds had epithelised irrespective of the study group. CONCLUSION: The application of honey appears to aid earlier epithelization of palatal surgical wounds following cleft palate repair and reduced the incidence of palatal fistula.