Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Clin Biochem ; 42(10-11): 929-42, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19362543

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis is the most common cause of fragility fractures. Bone remodelling is essential for repairing damaged areas within bone to preserve bone strength and for assisting in mineral homeostases. In young adults, bone remodelling is usually balanced with approximately as much bone replaced as is removed during each remodelling cycle. However, when remodelling becomes accelerated in combination with an imbalance that favours bone resorption over formation, such as during menopause, precipitous losses in bone mass occur. Bone turnover markers (BTMs) measure the rate of bone remodelling allowing for a dynamic assessment of skeletal status and hold promise in identifying those at highest risk of rapid bone loss and subsequent fracture. Further, the use of BTMs to monitor individuals administered osteoporosis therapy is attractive as monitoring anti-fracture efficacy with bone mineral density has significant limitations. This review details remodelling biology, pre-analytical and analytical sources of variability for BTMs, describes the most commonly used resorption and formation markers, and offers some guidelines for their use and interpretation in the laboratory and the clinic.


Subject(s)
Bone Remodeling/physiology , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/metabolism , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/therapy , Biomarkers/metabolism , Bone Resorption/metabolism , Bone Resorption/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Osteogenesis/physiology , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology
2.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 88(6): 1528-34, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19064512

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many residents of the United States and Canada depend on dietary sources of vitamin D to help maintain vitamin D status. Because few natural food sources contain vitamin D, fortified foods may be required. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the effects of vitamin D-fortified foods on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations. DESIGN: We searched MEDLINE (1966 to June Week 3 2006), Embase, CINAHL, AMED, Biological Abstracts, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vitamin D-fortified foods with a control and reporting serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, assessed trial quality, and extracted relevant data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses of absolute mean change in 25(OH)D were conducted by using a random-effects model, with evaluation of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Nine RCTs (n = 889 subjects) were included, of which 8 consistently showed a significant beneficial effect of food fortification on 25(OH)D concentrations. Although 7 RCTs (n = 585 subjects) potentially were meta-analyzable, we were unable to combine the overall results because of significant heterogeneity. The individual treatment effects ranged from 14.5 (95% CIs: 10.6, 18.4) nmol/L to 34.5 (17.64, 51.36) nmol/L (3.4-25 microg vitamin D/d). Subgroup analyses showed a reduction in heterogeneity and significant treatment effect when 4 trials that used milk as the fortified food source were combined. CONCLUSION: Most trials were small in size and inadequately reported allocation concealment, but results showed that vitamin D-fortified foods improved vitamin D status in adults.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Food, Fortified , Milk/chemistry , Nutritional Status , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin D/blood , Young Adult
3.
Can J Cardiol ; 19(4): 383-6, 2003 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12704483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Troponin T (cTnT) and troponin I (cTnI) are present in the sera of some heart failure (HF) patients and have potential importance as prognostic markers. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the prognostic value of cTnT and cTnI in well-characterized HF patients and clarify their relationship to other clinical markers of HF severity. METHODS: cTnT and cTnI were measured in 78 HF patients (45 inpatients, 33 outpatients) who were followed up prospectively for 12 months. RESULTS: Plasma cTnT (> or =0.02 ng/mL) and cTnI (> or =0.3 ng/mL) were detected in 51% and 46% of patients, respectively. These patients were more likely to be inpatients (70% versus 45% for cTnT, 75% versus 43% for cTnI, P<0.05 for both), have a higher plasma creatinine (153 versus 119 micromol/L for cTnT; 157 versus 118 micromol/L for cTnI, P<0.05) and lower plasma sodium (134 versus 138 mmol/L for both, P<0.05). At 12 months, they were more likely to have died or undergone cardiac transplantation (41% versus 14%, P=0.01 for cTnT; 43% versus 15%, P=0.004 for cTnI). After adjustment for New York Heart Association class, plasma sodium and inpatient status, a significant association with events was still evident for both troponins. CONCLUSIONS: Both cTnT and cTnI are strongly associated with other clinical indicators of HF severity and remain independent predictors of prognosis after adjustment for these factors. These results indicate a potential role for cTnT and cTnI in the clinical management of HF patients.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/mortality , Troponin I/blood , Troponin T/blood , Aged , Biomarkers , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Heart Failure/blood , Heart Failure/pathology , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Patient Admission , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
5.
Patient Educ Couns ; 47(3): 245-55, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12088603

ABSTRACT

This study's aim was to develop and pilot test an evidence-based decision aid for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who are considering options to prevent fractures. The aid was based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, and integrated evidence from our Cochrane systematic reviews. Following development by a panel of experts in osteoporosis and decision making, a user review panel of practitioners and women who had already made their decision about osteoporosis therapy reviewed the decision aid for acceptability. Then the decision aid was pilot tested using a before-after design in women at the point of decision making. Compared to baseline, there were statistically significant improvements in knowledge, realistic expectations and decreased decisional conflict. Our decision aid shows promise in preparing women for counseling about osteoporosis therapies. Long-term adherence to chosen therapy and quality of life will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/psychology , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Participation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Decision Making , Female , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Health Promotion , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/therapy , Pilot Projects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...