ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of disability and mortality, with skull fractures being a frequent and serious consequence. Accurate and rapid diagnosis of these fractures is crucial, yet current manual methods via cranial CT scans are time-consuming and prone to error. METHODS: This review paper focuses on the evolution of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for detecting skull fractures in TBI patients. It critically assesses advancements from feature-based algorithms to modern machine learning and deep learning techniques. We examine current approaches to data acquisition, the use of public datasets, algorithmic strategies, and performance metrics RESULTS: The review highlights the potential of CAD systems to provide quick and reliable diagnostics, particularly outside regular clinical hours and in under-resourced settings. Our discussion encapsulates the challenges inherent in automated skull fracture assessment and suggests directions for future research to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient care. CONCLUSION: With CAD systems, we stand on the cusp of significantly improving TBI management, underscoring the need for continued innovation in this field.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Non-invasive, beat-to-beat variations in physiological indices provide an opportunity for more accessible assessment of autonomic dysfunction. The potential association between the changes in these parameters and arterial stiffness in hypertension remains poorly understood. This systematic review aims to investigate the association between non-invasive indicators of autonomic function based on beat-to-beat cardiovascular signals with arterial stiffness in individuals with hypertension. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2022. Studies that investigated non-invasive parameters of arterial stiffness and autonomic function using beat-to-beat cardiovascular signals over a period of > 5min were included. Study quality was assessed using the STROBE criteria. Two authors screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts independently. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. A comprehensive overview of experimental design for assessing autonomic function in terms of baroreflex sensitivity and beat-to-beat cardiovascular variabilities, as well as arterial stiffness, was presented. Alterations in non-invasive indicators of autonomic function, which included baroreflex sensitivity, beat-to-beat cardiovascular variabilities and hemodynamic changes in response to autonomic challenges, as well as arterial stiffness, were identified in individuals with hypertension. A mixed result was found in terms of the association between non-invasive quantitative autonomic indices and arterial stiffness in hypertensive individuals. Nine out of 12 studies which quantified baroreflex sensitivity revealed a significant association with arterial stiffness parameters. Three studies estimated beat-to-beat heart rate variability and only one study reported a significant relationship with arterial stiffness indices. Three out of five studies which studied beat-to-beat blood pressure variability showed a significant association with arterial structural changes. One study revealed that hemodynamic changes in response to autonomic challenges were significantly correlated with arterial stiffness parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The current review demonstrated alteration in autonomic function, which encompasses both the sympathetic and parasympathetic modulation of sinus node function and vasomotor tone (derived from beat-to-beat cardiovascular signals) in hypertension, and a significant association between some of these parameters with arterial stiffness. By employing non-invasive measurements to monitor changes in autonomic function and arterial remodeling in individuals with hypertension, we would be able to enhance our ability to identify individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Understanding the intricate relationships among these cardiovascular variability measures and arterial stiffness could contribute toward better individualized treatment for hypertension in the future. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD42022336703. Date of registration: 12/06/2022.
ABSTRACT
To date there have only been limited studies exploring abnormal hemodynamic responses to head-up tilt tests (HUTs) in elderly, treated patients with hypertension. Cardiovascular regulation in response to HUT as well as upright hemodynamics may be altered when older hypertensive patients with antihypertensive treatments are studied. Hypertensive patients with and without receiving antihypertensive medication and above the age of 45 were recruited in this study. This study compared the cardiovascular responses to HUT and at rest between healthy and hypertensives using non-invasive hemodynamic measurements. Parameters such as systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), stroke index (SI) and total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) were measured in 40 subjects (20 healthy and 20 hypertensives) for 10-min supine baseline, 10-min HUT at 70⦠and 6-min supine recovery. At rest and during HUT, SBP and TPRI were significantly higher in hypertensives together with a significantly smaller baseline SI. In response to HUT, both groups showed changes in hemodynamic parameters at differing degrees. During recovery, all parameters returned to the baseline range. Our findings indicated that hypertensive patients of older age being treated by antihypertensive drugs may have different cardiovascular changes in response to orthostatic stress.Clinical Relevance- This pilot study describes how cardiovascular regulation in response to postural change may behave differently in hypertensive elder patients taking antihypertensive drugs.
