Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurosurg Sci ; 61(3): 263-270, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25854455

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized controlled study compared the changes in acid-base balance and serum electrolytes with the use of intravenous balanced and non-balanced crystalloid solutions intraoperatively during elective neurosurgery. METHODS: Thirty consented adult patients who underwent craniotomy were randomly allocated into two groups of 15 patients each. The non-balanced group received 0.9% normal saline while the balanced group received Sterofundin®ISO as the intraoperative fluid for maintenance. Biochemical indices for acid-base balance and serum electrolytes were analyzed periodically. RESULTS: In the non-balanced group, significant changes were noted in the pH, base excess and bicarbonate values over time compared to its respective baseline values (P<0.01). Four patients (27.7%) also developed a pH<7.35 and 5 patients (33.3%) developed marked acidosis with base excess <-4.0 at the end of surgery. Both mean sodium and chloride levels were also significantly higher compared to its baseline values respectively (142.6±2.4 versus 138±2.7 mmol/L, P<0.01 and 105.7±4.1 versus 113.2±3.0 mmol/L (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A balanced solution (Sterofundin®ISO) provided significantly better control over acid-base balance, sodium and chloride levels when used as intraoperative fluid maintenance and replacement during elective neurosurgery.


Subject(s)
Acid-Base Equilibrium/physiology , Craniotomy/methods , Electrolytes/blood , Fluid Therapy/methods , Intraoperative Care/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Sodium Chloride/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organic Chemicals/therapeutic use
2.
Middle East J Anaesthesiol ; 23(1): 43-50, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26121894

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Video-laryngoscopes have gained popularity in the recent years and have shown definite advantages over the conventional Macintosh direct laryngoscopes. However, there is still insufficient evidence comparing the C-MAC with the Macintosh for patients during manual inline stabilization (MILS). METHODS: This prospective, randomized, single blind study was carried out to compare tracheal intubation using the C-MAC video-laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients during MILS. Ninety consented patients, without features of difficult airway, who required general anesthesia and tracheal intubation were recruited. Intubation was performed with either the C-MAC video-laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope by one single investigator experienced with both devices. Various parameters which included Cormack and Lehane score, time to intubate, intubation attempts, optimization maneuvers, complications and hemodynamic changes were recorded over the initial period of 5 minutes. RESULTS: C-MAC video-laryngoscope performed significantly better with lower Cormack and Lehane grades, shorter time to intubate of 32.7 ± 6.8 vs. 38.8 ± 8.9 seconds (p = 0.001) and needed less optimization maneuvers. There were no significant differences seen in the intubation attempts, complications or hemodynamic status of the patients with either device. CONCLUSION: The C-MAC video-laryngoscope was superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope for patients requiring intubation when manual inline neck stabilization was applied.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Laryngoscopes , Restraint, Physical , Adult , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method
3.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann ; 16(6): 468-72, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18984756

ABSTRACT

A prospective study was carried out to compare the outcomes of patients with preexisting non-dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Elective off-pump coronary artery bypass was performed in 29 patients with renal dysfunction. Their results were compared with those of a similar group of 35 patients who underwent the conventional on-pump coronary artery grafting. There was a significant deterioration in creatinine clearance in the on-pump group on days 1, 2, and 4 after surgery, while creatinine clearance in the off-pump group remained close to the baseline level. Both groups had improved to the preoperative creatinine clearance values on follow-up at 4 weeks. It was concluded that off-pump surgery provided better renal protection than the conventional on-pump technique in patients with preexisting non-dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Kidney Diseases/complications , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Creatinine/blood , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Kidney Diseases/physiopathology , Kidney Diseases/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...