Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent ; 32(4): e135-41, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22577656

ABSTRACT

This report describes a duplication technique of free gingival form from a provisional restoration to a zirconia crown. Three die casts were manufactured from a silicone impression with an acrylic resin ring tray. The first die cast was for the zirconia framework, the second for the provisionalized transfer coping, and the third for relining the provisional restoration. A free gingival impression was taken using a provisionalized transfer coping, and a soft gingival cast was manufactured. The depth of free gingival transparency was measured using a zirconia shade plate. Then, the zirconia framework was customized to allow for subgingival porcelain space. This technique seems to contribute to the clinical-laboratory interface in computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture restorations.


Subject(s)
Crowns , Dental Impression Technique , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Prosthesis Design , Gingiva/anatomy & histology , Zirconium/chemistry , Computer-Aided Design , Cuspid , Dental Impression Materials/chemistry , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Temporary , Female , Gingival Retraction Techniques , Gingivitis/prevention & control , Humans , Incisor , Middle Aged , Models, Dental , Polyvinyls/chemistry , Prosthesis Coloring , Siloxanes/chemistry , Surface Properties
2.
Eur J Esthet Dent ; 6(1): 88-93, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21403929

ABSTRACT

This study examined the distances between the facial and palatal papillae (DFPP) in the maxillary anterior dentition. A total of 360 filled interdental papillae in 72 study models were examined (Group A: 36 young patients, Group B: 36 adult patients). The DFPP was measured directly on alginate impressions. In Group A, the average DFPP was 1.27 ± 0.6, 1.53 ± 0.42, and 1.83 ± 0.56 mm between the central incisors (CI-CI), central and lateral incisors (CI-LI), and lateral incisor and canine (LI-CA), respectively. In Group B, the respective average DFPPs were 1.3 ± 0.83, 1.38 ± 0.68, and 1.62 ± 0.58 mm. Within the limits of the present study, the average distances between the facial and palatal papillae seem to be useful for setting the proximal contact position.


Subject(s)
Cuspid/anatomy & histology , Gingiva/anatomy & histology , Incisor/anatomy & histology , Maxilla/anatomy & histology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Cephalometry , Epithelial Attachment/anatomy & histology , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Dental , Odontometry , Palate/anatomy & histology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...